@misc{ManzoniCapekPoradaetal.2018, author = {Manzoni, Stefano and Capek, Petr and Porada, Philipp and Thurner, Martin and Winterdahl, Mattias and Beer, Christian and Bruchert, Volker and Frouz, Jan and Herrmann, Anke M. and Lindahl, Bjorn D. and Lyon, Steve W. and Šantrůčkov{\´a}, Hana and Vico, Giulia and Way, Danielle}, title = {Reviews and syntheses}, series = {Biogeosciences}, volume = {15}, journal = {Biogeosciences}, number = {19}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1726-4170}, doi = {10.5194/bg-15-5929-2018}, pages = {5929 -- 5949}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The cycling of carbon (C) between the Earth surface and the atmosphere is controlled by biological and abiotic processes that regulate C storage in biogeochemical compartments and release to the atmosphere. This partitioning is quantified using various forms of C-use efficiency (CUE) - the ratio of C remaining in a system to C entering that system. Biological CUE is the fraction of C taken up allocated to biosynthesis. In soils and sediments, C storage depends also on abiotic processes, so the term C-storage efficiency (CSE) can be used. Here we first review and reconcile CUE and CSE definitions proposed for autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms and communities, food webs, whole ecosystems and watersheds, and soils and sediments using a common mathematical framework. Second, we identify general CUE patterns; for example, the actual CUE increases with improving growth conditions, and apparent CUE decreases with increasing turnover. We then synthesize > 5000CUE estimates showing that CUE decreases with increasing biological and ecological organization - from uni-cellular to multicellular organisms and from individuals to ecosystems. We conclude that CUE is an emergent property of coupled biological-abiotic systems, and it should be regarded as a flexible and scale-dependent index of the capacity of a given system to effectively retain C.}, language = {en} } @misc{ManzoniČapekPoradaetal.2018, author = {Manzoni, Stefano and Čapek, Petr and Porada, Philipp and Thurner, Martin and Winterdahl, Mattias and Beer, Christian and Br{\"u}chert, Volker and Frouz, Jan and Herrmann, Anke M. and Lindahl, Bj{\"o}rn D. and Lyon, Steve W. and Šantrůčkov{\´a}, Hana and Vico, Giulia and Way, Danielle}, title = {Reviews and syntheses}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1134}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44638}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-446386}, pages = {23}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The cycling of carbon (C) between the Earth surface and the atmosphere is controlled by biological and abiotic processes that regulate C storage in biogeochemical compartments and release to the atmosphere. This partitioning is quantified using various forms of C-use efficiency (CUE) - the ratio of C remaining in a system to C entering that system. Biological CUE is the fraction of C taken up allocated to biosynthesis. In soils and sediments, C storage depends also on abiotic processes, so the term C-storage efficiency (CSE) can be used. Here we first review and reconcile CUE and CSE definitions proposed for autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms and communities, food webs, whole ecosystems and watersheds, and soils and sediments using a common mathematical framework. Second, we identify general CUE patterns; for example, the actual CUE increases with improving growth conditions, and apparent CUE decreases with increasing turnover. We then synthesize > 5000CUE estimates showing that CUE decreases with increasing biological and ecological organization - from uni-cellular to multicellular organisms and from individuals to ecosystems. We conclude that CUE is an emergent property of coupled biological-abiotic systems, and it should be regarded as a flexible and scale-dependent index of the capacity of a given system to effectively retain C.}, language = {en} } @article{TangMcGinnisFrindteetal.2014, author = {Tang, Kam W. and McGinnis, Daniel F. and Frindte, Katharina and Bruchert, Volker and Grossart, Hans-Peter}, title = {Paradox reconsidered: Methane oversaturation in well-oxygenated lake waters}, series = {Limnology and oceanography}, volume = {59}, journal = {Limnology and oceanography}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Waco}, issn = {0024-3590}, doi = {10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0275}, pages = {275 -- 284}, year = {2014}, abstract = {The widely reported paradox of methane oversaturation in oxygenated water challenges the prevailing paradigm that microbial methanogenesis only occurs under anoxic conditions. Using a combination of field sampling, incubation experiments, and modeling, we show that the recurring mid-water methane peak in Lake Stechlin, northeast Germany, was not dependent on methane input from the littoral zone or bottom sediment or on the presence of known micro-anoxic zones. The methane peak repeatedly overlapped with oxygen oversaturation in the seasonal thermocline. Incubation experiments and isotope analysis indicated active methane production, which was likely linked to photosynthesis and/or nitrogen fixation within the oxygenated water, whereas lessening of methane oxidation by light allowed accumulation of methane in the oxygen-rich upper layer. Estimated methane efflux from the surface water was up to 5 mmol m(-2) d(-1). Mid-water methane oversaturation was also observed in nine other lakes that collectively showed a strongly negative gradient of methane concentration within 0-20\% dissolved oxygen (DO) in the bottom water, and a positive gradient within >= 20\% DO in the upper water column. Further investigation into the responsible organisms and biochemical pathways will help improve our understanding of the global methane cycle.}, language = {en} }