@article{NdahSchulerDiehletal.2018,
  author    = {Ndah, Hycenth Tim and Schuler, Johannes and Diehl, Katharina and Bateki, Christian and Sieber, Stefan and Knierim, Andrea},
  title     = {From dogmatic views on conservation agriculture adoption in Zambia towards adapting to context},
  series = {International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1473-5903},
  doi       = {10.1080/14735903.2018.1447227},
  pages     = {228 -- 242},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Conservation Agriculture (CA) has been widely promoted in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as a sustainable agricultural practice, yet with debatable success. Most authors assume successful adoption, only if all three principles of CA are implemented: (1) minimum or zero tillage, (2) maintenance of a permanent soil cover, and (3) integration of crop rotations. Based on this strict definition, adoption has declined or remained stagnant. Presently, not much attention has been given to context-suited adaptation possibilities, and partial adoption has not been recognized as an entry point to full adoption. Furthermore, isolated success cases have not been analysed sufficiently. By applying the QAToCA approach based on focus group discussions complemented by semi-structured qualitative expert and farmer interviews, we assessed the reasons behind positive CA adaptation and adoption trends in Zambia. Main reasons behind Zambia's emerging success are (1) a positive institutional influence, (2) a systematic approach towards CA promotion - encouraging a stepwise adaptation and adoption, and (3) mobilization of strong marketing dynamics around CA. These findings could help to eventually adjust or redesign CA promotion activities. We argue for a careful shift from the 'dogmatic view' on adoption of CA as a packaged technology, towards adapting its principles to the small-scale farming context of SSA.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KoenigUthesSchuleretal.2013,
  author    = {K{\"o}nig, Hannes Jochen and Uthes, Sandra and Schuler, Johannes and Zhen, Lin and Purushothaman, Seema and Suarma, Utia and Sghaier, Mongi and Makokha, Stella and Helming, Katharina and Sieber, Stefan and Chen, Le and Brouwer, Floor and Morris, Jake and Wiggering, Hubert},
  title     = {Regional impact assessment of land use scenarios in developing countries using the FoPIA approach - findings from five case studies},
  series = {Journal of environmental management},
  volume    = {127},
  journal   = {Journal of environmental management},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0301-4797},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.021},
  pages     = {S56 -- S64},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The impact of land use changes on sustainable development is of increasing interest in many regions of the world. This study aimed to test the transferability of the Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA), which was originally developed in the European context, to developing countries, in which lack of data often prevents the use of data-driven impact assessment methods. The core aspect of FoPIA is the stakeholder-based assessment of alternative land use scenarios. Scenario impacts on regional sustainability are assessed by using a set of nine regional land use functions (LUFs), which equally cover the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The cases analysed in this study include (1) the alternative spatial planning policies around the Merapi volcano and surrounding areas of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia; (2) the large-scale afforestation of agricultural areas to reduce soil erosion in Guyuan, China; (3) the expansion of soil and water conservation measures in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia; (4) the agricultural intensification and the potential for organic agriculture in Bijapur, India; and (5) the land degradation and land conflicts resulting from land division and privatisation in Narok, Kenya. All five regions are characterised by population growth, partially combined with considerable economic development, environmental degradation problems and social conflicts. Implications of the regional scenario impacts as well as methodological aspects are discussed. Overall, FoPIA proved to be a useful tool for diagnosing regional human-environment interactions and for supporting the communication and social learning process among different stakeholder groups.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{GorskiJungLietal.2020,
  author    = {Gorski, Mathias and Jung, Bettina and Li, Yong and Matias-Garcia, Pamela R. and Wuttke, Matthias and Coassin, Stefan and Thio, Chris H. L. and Kleber, Marcus E. and Winkler, Thomas W. and Wanner, Veronika and Chai, Jin-Fang and Chu, Audrey Y. and Cocca, Massimiliano and Feitosa, Mary F. and Ghasemi, Sahar and Hoppmann, Anselm and Horn, Katrin and Li, Man and Nutile, Teresa and Scholz, Markus and Sieber, Karsten B. and Teumer, Alexander and Tin, Adrienne and Wang, Judy and Tayo, Bamidele O. and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S. and Almgren, Peter and Bakker, Stephan J. L. and Banas, Bernhard and Bansal, Nisha and Biggs, Mary L. and Boerwinkle, Eric and B{\"o}ttinger, Erwin and Brenner, Hermann and Carroll, Robert J. and Chalmers, John and Chee, Miao-Li and Chee, Miao-Ling and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Coresh, Josef and de Borst, Martin H. and Degenhardt, Frauke and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Endlich, Karlhans and Franke, Andre and Freitag-Wolf, Sandra and Gampawar, Piyush and Gansevoort, Ron T. and Ghanbari, Mohsen and Gieger, Christian and Hamet, Pavel and Ho, Kevin and Hofer, Edith and Holleczek, Bernd and Foo, Valencia Hui Xian and Hutri-Kahonen, Nina and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Ikram, M. Arfan and Josyula, Navya Shilpa and Kahonen, Mika and Khor, Chiea-Chuen and Koenig, Wolfgang and Kramer, Holly and Kraemer, Bernhard K. and Kuehnel, Brigitte and Lange, Leslie A. and Lehtimaki, Terho and Lieb, Wolfgang and Loos, Ruth J. F. and Lukas, Mary Ann and Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka and Meisinger, Christa and Meitinger, Thomas and Melander, Olle and Milaneschi, Yuri and Mishra, Pashupati P. and Mononen, Nina and Mychaleckyj, Josyf C. and Nadkarni, Girish N. and Nauck, Matthias and Nikus, Kjell and Ning, Boting and Nolte, Ilja M. and O'Donoghue, Michelle L. and Orho-Melander, Marju and Pendergrass, Sarah A. and Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. and Preuss, Michael H. and Psaty, Bruce M. and Raffield, Laura M. and Raitakari, Olli T. and Rettig, Rainer and Rheinberger, Myriam and Rice, Kenneth M. and Rosenkranz, Alexander R. and Rossing, Peter and Rotter, Jerome and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold and Schoettker, Ben and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Sedaghat, Sanaz and Shaffer, Christian M. and Strauch, Konstantin and Szymczak, Silke and Taylor, Kent D. and Tremblay, Johanne and Chaker, Layal and van der Harst, Pim and van der Most, Peter J. and Verweij, Niek and Voelker, Uwe and Waldenberger, Melanie and Wallentin, Lars and Waterworth, Dawn M. and White, Harvey D. and Wilson, James G. and Wong, Tien-Yin and Woodward, Mark and Yang, Qiong and Yasuda, Masayuki and Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M. and Zhang, Yan and Snieder, Harold and Wanner, Christoph and Boger, Carsten A. and Kottgen, Anna and Kronenberg, Florian and Pattaro, Cristian and Heid, Iris M.},
  title     = {Meta-analysis uncovers genome-wide significant variants for rapid kidney function decline},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t},
  number    = {19},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56537},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-565379},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Rapid decline of glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine (eGFRcrea) is associated with severe clinical endpoints. In contrast to cross-sectionally assessed eGFRcrea, the genetic basis for rapid eGFRcrea decline is largely unknown. To help define this, we meta-analyzed 42 genome-wide association studies from the Chronic Kidney Diseases Genetics Consortium and United Kingdom Biobank to identify genetic loci for rapid eGFRcrea decline. Two definitions of eGFRcrea decline were used: 3 mL/min/1.73m(2)/year or more ("Rapid3"; encompassing 34,874 cases, 107,090 controls) and eGFRcrea decline 25\% or more and eGFRcrea under 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up among those with eGFRcrea 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) or more at baseline ("CKDi25"; encompassing 19,901 cases, 175,244 controls). Seven independent variants were identified across six loci for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25: consisting of five variants at four loci with genome-wide significance (near UMOD-PDILT (2), PRKAG2, WDR72, OR2S2) and two variants among 265 known eGFRcrea variants (near GATM, LARP4B). All these loci were novel for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25 and our bioinformatic follow-up prioritized variants and genes underneath these loci. The OR2S2 locus is novel for any eGFRcrea trait including interesting candidates. For the five genome-wide significant lead variants, we found supporting effects for annual change in blood urea nitrogen or cystatin-based eGFR, but not for GATM or (LARP4B). Individuals at high compared to those at low genetic risk (8-14 vs. 0-5 adverse alleles) had a 1.20-fold increased risk of acute kidney injury (95\% confidence interval 1.08-1.33). Thus, our identified loci for rapid kidney function decline may help prioritize therapeutic targets and identify mechanisms and individuals at risk for sustained deterioration of kidney function.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GorskiJungLietal.2020,
  author    = {Gorski, Mathias and Jung, Bettina and Li, Yong and Matias-Garcia, Pamela R. and Wuttke, Matthias and Coassin, Stefan and Thio, Chris H. L. and Kleber, Marcus E. and Winkler, Thomas W. and Wanner, Veronika and Chai, Jin-Fang and Chu, Audrey Y. and Cocca, Massimiliano and Feitosa, Mary F. and Ghasemi, Sahar and Hoppmann, Anselm and Horn, Katrin and Li, Man and Nutile, Teresa and Scholz, Markus and Sieber, Karsten B. and Teumer, Alexander and Tin, Adrienne and Wang, Judy and Tayo, Bamidele O. and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S. and Almgren, Peter and Bakker, Stephan J. L. and Banas, Bernhard and Bansal, Nisha and Biggs, Mary L. and Boerwinkle, Eric and B{\"o}ttinger, Erwin and Brenner, Hermann and Carroll, Robert J. and Chalmers, John and Chee, Miao-Li and Chee, Miao-Ling and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Coresh, Josef and de Borst, Martin H. and Degenhardt, Frauke and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Endlich, Karlhans and Franke, Andre and Freitag-Wolf, Sandra and Gampawar, Piyush and Gansevoort, Ron T. and Ghanbari, Mohsen and Gieger, Christian and Hamet, Pavel and Ho, Kevin and Hofer, Edith and Holleczek, Bernd and Foo, Valencia Hui Xian and Hutri-Kahonen, Nina and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Ikram, M. Arfan and Josyula, Navya Shilpa and Kahonen, Mika and Khor, Chiea-Chuen and Koenig, Wolfgang and Kramer, Holly and Kraemer, Bernhard K. and Kuehnel, Brigitte and Lange, Leslie A. and Lehtimaki, Terho and Lieb, Wolfgang and Loos, Ruth J. F. and Lukas, Mary Ann and Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka and Meisinger, Christa and Meitinger, Thomas and Melander, Olle and Milaneschi, Yuri and Mishra, Pashupati P. and Mononen, Nina and Mychaleckyj, Josyf C. and Nadkarni, Girish N. and Nauck, Matthias and Nikus, Kjell and Ning, Boting and Nolte, Ilja M. and O'Donoghue, Michelle L. and Orho-Melander, Marju and Pendergrass, Sarah A. and Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. and Preuss, Michael H. and Psaty, Bruce M. and Raffield, Laura M. and Raitakari, Olli T. and Rettig, Rainer and Rheinberger, Myriam and Rice, Kenneth M. and Rosenkranz, Alexander R. and Rossing, Peter and Rotter, Jerome and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold and Schoettker, Ben and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Sedaghat, Sanaz and Shaffer, Christian M. and Strauch, Konstantin and Szymczak, Silke and Taylor, Kent D. and Tremblay, Johanne and Chaker, Layal and van der Harst, Pim and van der Most, Peter J. and Verweij, Niek and Voelker, Uwe and Waldenberger, Melanie and Wallentin, Lars and Waterworth, Dawn M. and White, Harvey D. and Wilson, James G. and Wong, Tien-Yin and Woodward, Mark and Yang, Qiong and Yasuda, Masayuki and Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M. and Zhang, Yan and Snieder, Harold and Wanner, Christoph and Boger, Carsten A. and Kottgen, Anna and Kronenberg, Florian and Pattaro, Cristian and Heid, Iris M.},
  title     = {Meta-analysis uncovers genome-wide significant variants for rapid kidney function decline},
  series = {Kidney international : official journal of the International Society of Nephrology},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Kidney international : official journal of the International Society of Nephrology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  organization    = {Lifelines Cohort Study<br /> Regeneron Genetics Ctr},
  issn      = {0085-2538},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.kint.2020.09.030},
  pages     = {926 -- 939},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Rapid decline of glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine (eGFRcrea) is associated with severe clinical endpoints. In contrast to cross-sectionally assessed eGFRcrea, the genetic basis for rapid eGFRcrea decline is largely unknown. To help define this, we meta-analyzed 42 genome-wide association studies from the Chronic Kidney Diseases Genetics Consortium and United Kingdom Biobank to identify genetic loci for rapid eGFRcrea decline. Two definitions of eGFRcrea decline were used: 3 mL/min/1.73m(2)/year or more ("Rapid3"; encompassing 34,874 cases, 107,090 controls) and eGFRcrea decline 25\% or more and eGFRcrea under 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up among those with eGFRcrea 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) or more at baseline ("CKDi25"; encompassing 19,901 cases, 175,244 controls). Seven independent variants were identified across six loci for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25: consisting of five variants at four loci with genome-wide significance (near UMOD-PDILT (2), PRKAG2, WDR72, OR2S2) and two variants among 265 known eGFRcrea variants (near GATM, LARP4B). All these loci were novel for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25 and our bioinformatic follow-up prioritized variants and genes underneath these loci. The OR2S2 locus is novel for any eGFRcrea trait including interesting candidates. For the five genome-wide significant lead variants, we found supporting effects for annual change in blood urea nitrogen or cystatin-based eGFR, but not for GATM or (LARP4B). Individuals at high compared to those at low genetic risk (8-14 vs. 0-5 adverse alleles) had a 1.20-fold increased risk of acute kidney injury (95\% confidence interval 1.08-1.33). Thus, our identified loci for rapid kidney function decline may help prioritize therapeutic targets and identify mechanisms and individuals at risk for sustained deterioration of kidney function.},
  language  = {en}
}