@article{SchroeterRitterHolschneideretal.2016,
  author    = {Schroeter, M-A and Ritter, M. and Holschneider, Matthias and Sturm, H.},
  title     = {Enhanced DySEM imaging of cantilever motion using artificial structures patterned by focused ion beam techniques},
  series = {Journal of micromechanics and microengineering},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Journal of micromechanics and microengineering},
  publisher = {IOP Publ. Ltd.},
  address   = {Bristol},
  issn      = {0960-1317},
  doi       = {10.1088/0960-1317/26/3/035010},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {We use a dynamic scanning electron microscope (DySEM) to map the spatial distribution of the vibration of a cantilever beam. The DySEM measurements are based on variations of the local secondary electron signal within the imaging electron beam diameter during an oscillation period of the cantilever. For this reason, the surface of a cantilever without topography or material variation does not allow any conclusions about the spatial distribution of vibration due to a lack of dynamic contrast. In order to overcome this limitation, artificial structures were added at defined positions on the cantilever surface using focused ion beam lithography patterning. The DySEM signal of such high-contrast structures is strongly improved, hence information about the surface vibration becomes accessible. Simulations of images of the vibrating cantilever have also been performed. The results of the simulation are in good agreement with the experimental images.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchroeterStumpfLoosetal.2017,
  author    = {Schroeter, Matthias and Stumpf, Klara H. and Loos, Jacqueline and van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E. and Boehnke-Henrichs, Anne and Abson, David J.},
  title     = {Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability},
  series = {Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2212-0416},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.019},
  pages     = {35 -- 43},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Ecosystem services and sustainability have become prominent concepts in international policy and research agendas. However, a common conceptual ground between these concepts is currently underdeveloped. In particular, a vision is missing on how to align ecosystem services with overarching sustainability goals. Originally, the ecosystem service concept focused on sustaining human well-being through biodiversity conservation. Nevertheless, studies within the field also consider appropriation beyond carrying capacities, and natural resource management that involves environmentally damaging inputs as ecosystem service provision. This brings the ecosystem service concept into conflict with the core goal of sustainability, i.e. achieving justice within ecological limits over the long term. Here, we link the ecosystem service concept to sustainability outcomes operationalized in terms of justice. Our framing positions sustainability as an overarching goal which can be achieved through seven key strategies: equitable (1) intergenerational and (2) intragenerational distribution, (3) interspecies distribution, (4) fair procedures, recognition and participation, (5) sufficiency, (6) efficiency, and (7) persistence. Applying these strategies has the potential to re-focus the ecosystem service concept towards the normative goal of sustainability. We identify research needs for each strategy and further discuss questions regarding operationalization of the strategies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}