@article{NivenAbelSchlegeletal.2019, author = {Niven, Robert K. and Abel, Markus and Schlegel, Michael and Waldrip, Steven H.}, title = {Maximum Entropy Analysis of Flow Networks: Theoretical Foundation and Applications}, series = {Entropy}, volume = {21}, journal = {Entropy}, number = {8}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {1099-4300}, doi = {10.3390/e21080776}, pages = {776}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The concept of a "flow network"-a set of nodes and links which carries one or more flows-unites many different disciplines, including pipe flow, fluid flow, electrical, chemical reaction, ecological, epidemiological, neurological, communications, transportation, financial, economic and human social networks. This Feature Paper presents a generalized maximum entropy framework to infer the state of a flow network, including its flow rates and other properties, in probabilistic form. In this method, the network uncertainty is represented by a joint probability function over its unknowns, subject to all that is known. This gives a relative entropy function which is maximized, subject to the constraints, to determine the most probable or most representative state of the network. The constraints can include "observable" constraints on various parameters, "physical" constraints such as conservation laws and frictional properties, and "graphical" constraints arising from uncertainty in the network structure itself. Since the method is probabilistic, it enables the prediction of network properties when there is insufficient information to obtain a deterministic solution. The derived framework can incorporate nonlinear constraints or nonlinear interdependencies between variables, at the cost of requiring numerical solution. The theoretical foundations of the method are first presented, followed by its application to a variety of flow networks.}, language = {en} } @misc{WaldripNivenAbeletal.2017, author = {Waldrip, Steven H. and Niven, Robert K. and Abel, Markus and Schlegel, Michael}, title = {Consistent maximum entropy representations of pipe flow networks}, series = {AIP conference proceedings}, volume = {1853}, journal = {AIP conference proceedings}, number = {1}, publisher = {American Institute of Physics}, address = {Melville}, isbn = {978-0-7354-1527-0}, issn = {0094-243X}, doi = {10.1063/1.4985365}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The maximum entropy method is used to predict flows on water distribution networks. This analysis extends the water distribution network formulation of Waldrip et al. (2016) Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE), by the use of a continuous relative entropy defined on a reduced parameter set. This reduction in the parameters that the entropy is defined over ensures consistency between different representations of the same network. The performance of the proposed reduced parameter method is demonstrated with a one-loop network case study.}, language = {en} } @misc{WaldripNivenAbeletal.2017, author = {Waldrip, Steven H. and Niven, Robert K. and Abel, Markus and Schlegel, Michael}, title = {Maximum entropy analysis of transport networks}, series = {AIP conference proceedings}, volume = {1853}, journal = {AIP conference proceedings}, number = {1}, publisher = {American Institute of Physics}, address = {Melville}, isbn = {978-0-7354-1527-0}, issn = {0094-243X}, doi = {10.1063/1.4985364}, pages = {8}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The maximum entropy method is used to derive an alternative gravity model for a transport network. The proposed method builds on previous methods which assign the discrete value of a maximum entropy distribution to equal the traffic flow rate. The proposed method however, uses a distribution to represent each flow rate. The proposed method is shown to be able to handle uncertainty in a more elegant way and give similar results to traditional methods. It is able to incorporate more of the observed data through the entropy function, prior distribution and integration limits potentially allowing better inferences to be made.}, language = {en} } @article{WaldripNivenAbeletal.2017, author = {Waldrip, S. H. and Niven, Robert K. and Abel, Markus and Schlegel, M.}, title = {Reduced-Parameter Method for Maximum Entropy Analysis of Hydraulic Pipe Flow Networks}, series = {Journal of hydraulic engineering}, volume = {144}, journal = {Journal of hydraulic engineering}, number = {2}, publisher = {American Society of Civil Engineers}, address = {Reston}, issn = {0733-9429}, doi = {10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001379}, pages = {10}, year = {2017}, abstract = {A maximum entropy (MaxEnt) method is developed to predict flow rates or pressure gradients in hydraulic pipe networks without sufficient information to give a closed-form (deterministic) solution. This methodology substantially extends existing deterministic flow network analysis methods. It builds on the MaxEnt framework previously developed by the authors. This study uses a continuous relative entropy defined on a reduced parameter set, here based on the external flow rates. This formulation ensures consistency between different representations of the same network. The relative entropy is maximized subject to observable constraints on the mean values of a subset of flow rates or potential differences, the frictional properties of each pipe, and physical constraints arising from Kirchhoff's first and second laws. The new method is demonstrated by application to a simple one-loop network and a 1,123-node, 1,140-pipe water distribution network in the suburb of Torrens, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.}, language = {en} } @article{MeisterLiperovskySchlegeletal.1995, author = {Meister, Claudia-Veronika and Liperovsky, Viktor A. and Schlegel, K. and Haldoupis, Ch.}, title = {Currents and turbulence in and near mid-latitude sporadic e-layers caused by strong acoustic impulses}, series = {Preprint NLD}, volume = {11}, journal = {Preprint NLD}, publisher = {Univ.}, address = {Potsdam}, pages = {15 S.}, year = {1995}, language = {en} } @article{LiperovskyMeisterHaldoupisetal.1994, author = {Liperovsky, Viktor A. and Meister, Claudia-Veronika and Haldoupis, Ch. and Schlegel, K.}, title = {Electrical currents and Farley-Buneman turbulence in mid-latitude sporadic E-layers}, year = {1994}, language = {en} } @article{WaldripNivenAbeletal.2016, author = {Waldrip, S. H. and Niven, R. K. and Abel, Markus and Schlegel, M.}, title = {Maximum Entropy Analysis of Hydraulic Pipe Flow Networks}, series = {Journal of hydraulic engineering}, volume = {142}, journal = {Journal of hydraulic engineering}, publisher = {American Society of Civil Engineers}, address = {Reston}, issn = {0733-9429}, doi = {10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001126}, pages = {332 -- 347}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{SeroussiNowickiPayneetal.2020, author = {Seroussi, Helene and Nowicki, Sophie and Payne, Antony J. and Goelzer, Heiko and Lipscomb, William H. and Abe-Ouchi, Ayako and Agosta, Cecile and Albrecht, Torsten and Asay-Davis, Xylar and Barthel, Alice and Calov, Reinhard and Cullather, Richard and Dumas, Christophe and Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K. and Gladstone, Rupert and Golledge, Nicholas R. and Gregory, Jonathan M. and Greve, Ralf and Hattermann, Tore and Hoffman, Matthew J. and Humbert, Angelika and Huybrechts, Philippe and Jourdain, Nicolas C. and Kleiner, Thomas and Larour, Eric and Leguy, Gunter R. and Lowry, Daniel P. and Little, Chistopher M. and Morlighem, Mathieu and Pattyn, Frank and Pelle, Tyler and Price, Stephen F. and Quiquet, Aurelien and Reese, Ronja and Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne and Shepherd, Andrew and Simon, Erika and Smith, Robin S. and Straneo, Fiammetta and Sun, Sainan and Trusel, Luke D. and Van Breedam, Jonas and van de Wal, Roderik S. W. and Winkelmann, Ricarda and Zhao, Chen and Zhang, Tong and Zwinger, Thomas}, title = {ISMIP6 Antarctica}, series = {The Cryosphere : TC ; an interactive open access journal of the European Geosciences Union}, volume = {14}, journal = {The Cryosphere : TC ; an interactive open access journal of the European Geosciences Union}, number = {9}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1994-0416}, doi = {10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020}, pages = {3033 -- 3070}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Ice flow models of the Antarctic ice sheet are commonly used to simulate its future evolution in response to different climate scenarios and assess the mass loss that would contribute to future sea level rise. However, there is currently no consensus on estimates of the future mass balance of the ice sheet, primarily because of differences in the representation of physical processes, forcings employed and initial states of ice sheet models. This study presents results from ice flow model simulations from 13 international groups focusing on the evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet during the period 2015-2100 as part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). They are forced with outputs from a subset of models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), representative of the spread in climate model results. Simulations of the Antarctic ice sheet contribution to sea level rise in response to increased warming during this period varies between 7:8 and 30.0 cm of sea level equivalent (SLE) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario forcing. These numbers are relative to a control experiment with constant climate conditions and should therefore be added to the mass loss contribution under climate conditions similar to present-day conditions over the same period. The simulated evolution of the West Antarctic ice sheet varies widely among models, with an overall mass loss, up to 18.0 cm SLE, in response to changes in oceanic conditions. East Antarctica mass change varies between 6 :1 and 8.3 cm SLE in the simulations, with a significant increase in surface mass balance outweighing the increased ice discharge under most RCP 8.5 scenario forcings. The inclusion of ice shelf collapse, here assumed to be caused by large amounts of liquid water ponding at the surface of ice shelves, yields an additional simulated mass loss of 28mm compared to simulations without ice shelf collapse. The largest sources of uncertainty come from the climate forcing, the ocean-induced melt rates, the calibration of these melt rates based on oceanic conditions taken outside of ice shelf cavities and the ice sheet dynamic response to these oceanic changes. Results under RCP 2.6 scenario based on two CMIP5 climate models show an additional mass loss of 0 and 3 cm of SLE on average compared to simulations done under present-day conditions for the two CMIP5 forcings used and display limited mass gain in East Antarctica.}, language = {en} }