@article{TiberiusWeylandMahto2023,
  author    = {Tiberius, Victor and Weyland, Michael and Mahto, Raj V.},
  title     = {Best of entrepreneurship education?},
  series = {The international journal of management education},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {The international journal of management education},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1472-8117},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100753},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Entrepreneurship education has gained widespread attention in both education practice and research over the past three decades. However, whereas research has a strong focus on its effects and many normative concepts exist, little is known about how entrepreneurship is actually taught. To address this research gap, we conduct a curriculum analysis of the 50 best programs in entrepreneurship, according to the 2018 Financial Times ranking "Top MBAs for Entrepreneurship 2018". In particular, we examine their objectives, learning contents and teaching as well as assessment methods as four major dimensions of a graduate entrepreneurship curriculum. The results show that the programs are primarily business and management programs, with a comparatively small share of entrepreneurship itself. Entrepreneurship-specific goals are entrepreneurial attitudes and competences, such as entrepreneurial leadership, entrepreneurial mindset, entrepreneurial skills, opportunity creation, opportunity identification, and transforming uncertainty into opportunity. The learning contents also focus on business, management, and law, whereas the contents relating to entrepreneurship include entrepreneurial failure, entrepreneurial management, entrepreneurial thinking, and entrepreneurship in general. Teaching methods are mainly the ones usually found in higher education, with business plans and prototyping as additional entrepreneurial ones. Assessment methods do not differ from those in business and management education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{WulffTiberiusMahto2023,
  author    = {Wulff, Markus and Tiberius, Victor and Mahto, Raj V.},
  title     = {Mapping the intellectual structure of family firm research and proposing a research agenda},
  series = {Research handbook on entrepreneurship and innovation in family firms},
  booktitle = {Research handbook on entrepreneurship and innovation in family firms},
  editor    = {Kraus, Sascha and Clauß, Thomas and Kallmuenzer, Andreas},
  publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
  address   = {Cheltenham},
  isbn      = {978-1-80088-923-1},
  doi       = {10.4337/9781800889248.00007},
  pages     = {14 -- 37},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In this chapter, we conduct bibliometric performance analyses and a co-citation analysis on all articles relating to family firms indexed in Scopus and Web of Science and all articles published in the Family Business Review, Journal of Family Business Management, and the Journal of Family Business Strategy. Based on the literature sample of 4,056 articles published between 1960 and 2020 by 3,600 authors in 783 journals and their 175,163 references, we identify the most productive and most cited journals, the most cited authors, and the 25 most cited articles. Our science mapping reveals the agency theory, definitions, entrepreneurship, internationalization, ownership, resources, socioemotional wealth, and succession as the predominant research themes in family firm research. Whereas entrepreneurship explicitly appears in one of the clusters, innovation does not yet. Based on our findings, we propose a research framework and point to several research gaps to be addressed by future research.},
  language  = {en}
}