@article{SprengerRudackSchudomaetal.2015,
  author    = {Sprenger, Heike and Rudack, Katharina and Schudoma, Christian and Neumann, Arne and Seddig, Sylvia and Peters, Rolf and Zuther, Ellen and Kopka, Joachim and Hincha, Dirk K. and Walther, Dirk and Koehl, Karin},
  title     = {Assessment of drought tolerance and its potential yield penalty in potato},
  series = {Functional plant biology : an international journal of plant function},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Functional plant biology : an international journal of plant function},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {CSIRO},
  address   = {Clayton},
  issn      = {1445-4408},
  doi       = {10.1071/FP15013},
  pages     = {655 -- 667},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Climate models predict an increased likelihood of seasonal droughts for many areas of the world. Breeding for drought tolerance could be accelerated by marker-assisted selection. As a basis for marker identification, we studied the genetic variance, predictability of field performance and potential costs of tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato produces high calories per unit of water invested, but is drought-sensitive. In 14 independent pot or field trials, 34 potato cultivars were grown under optimal and reduced water supply to determine starch yield. In an artificial dataset, we tested several stress indices for their power to distinguish tolerant and sensitive genotypes independent of their yield potential. We identified the deviation of relative starch yield from the experimental median (DRYM) as the most efficient index. DRYM corresponded qualitatively to the partial least square model-based metric of drought stress tolerance in a stress effect model. The DRYM identified significant tolerance variation in the European potato cultivar population to allow tolerance breeding and marker identification. Tolerance results from pot trials correlated with those from field trials but predicted field performance worse than field growth parameters. Drought tolerance correlated negatively with yield under optimal conditions in the field. The distribution of yield data versus DRYM indicated that tolerance can be combined with average yield potentials, thus circumventing potential yield penalties in tolerance breeding.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RennerNeumannBurkartetal.2012,
  author    = {Renner, Swen C. and Neumann, Dirk and Burkart, Michael and Feit, Ute and Giere, Peter and Groeger, Andreas and Paulsch, Axel and Paulsch, Cornelia and Sterz, Mario and Vohland, Katrin},
  title     = {Import and export of biological samples from tropical countries-considerations and guidelines for research teams},
  series = {Organisms, diversity \& evolution : official journal of the Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Biologische Systematik},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Organisms, diversity \& evolution : official journal of the Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Biologische Systematik},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1439-6092},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13127-012-0076-4},
  pages     = {81 -- 98},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {'Biodiversity' is increasingly perceived as an important resource for research and conservation, but also for economy. Conservation, access and sustainable use of biodiversity (genetic resources, species, samples) are negotiated on different political levels, resulting in an internationally binding legal framework. Resulting legislation is binding for all parties involved in biological sampling, i.e. researches and (and in italics) countries, and especially applies for tissue or DNA samples and dervied products thereof. Understanding and awareness of export and import permits for biological samples is increasingly important for biologists to perform research projects legally and timely. Nevertheless, some biologists are still exporting and importing biological samples ignoring or noncompliant with national and international legislation, conventions, and regulations. Resulting difficulties may not only cause serious problems during field work, but may also delay the export, import or exchange of samples. Comprehensive a priori information regarding legal requirements helps to avoid or at least diminish potential problems. We identified four major factors facilitating export/import permits: (1) good personal (mutually trusted) contacts in the country of origin, (2) understanding and compliance with all relevant laws and regulations; (3) access to information regarding knowledge on permits, regulations and laws including their circulation within the researcher communities; and (4) access to consistent and up to date regulations},
  language  = {en}
}