@article{ScholkmannSiemonBoometal.2017,
  author    = {Scholkmann, Antonia and Siemon, Jens and Boom, Kay-Dennis and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Lernzeitnutzung im Planspielunterricht},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-017-0736-4},
  pages     = {651 -- 669},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The effective use of learning time is considered one of the most important predictors of successful and good teaching. In the present study we investigated how cognitive skills and goal orientation influenced the effective use of learning time during the open phases of game-based learning We used a newly developed method for video- and audio analysis (German: MuVA), which allowed for reliable documentation of students' interactions during those phases. The two-step multiple regression model demonstrated that both the learner's and the learning partner's goal orientation explain significant parts of the variance: A high performance goal orientation impairs a student's effective use of learning time, while a high performance avoidance orientation has a positive impact on his or her effective use of learning time. Working with a partner who has a high learning goal orientation or a high work avoidance orientation increases a student's effective use of his or her learning time, while a high work avoidance orientation on the partner's side has the opposite effect. Cognitive skills did not influence the effective use of learning time.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{KniggeKrauskopfWagner2019,
  author    = {Knigge, Michel and Krauskopf, Karsten and Wagner, Simon},
  title     = {Improving Socio-Emotional Competencies Using a Staged Video-Based Learning Program?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {593},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44286},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-442868},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Relationship quality between teachers and their students is a critical aspect for well-being and effective learning in school. Accordingly, teacher training should promote competencies for creating and maintaining positive relationships in the classroom. The Helga Breuninger Foundation developed a video-based online training (Intus³) that intends to focus on student teachers' interpersonal competencies by reflecting on staged videos. Although this training is well-designed, there is only little empirical evidence in general and so far no experimental research investigating the effects of Intus³. Accordingly, we investigated whether this program is able to improve the capacities of student teachers' interpersonal competencies, affective well-being, and affective attitudes toward challenging students. We conducted two randomized experimental studies (n1 = 132, n2 = 242) within lectures in teacher education at the University of Potsdam, introducing the basics of inclusive education in two consecutive semesters. We compared groups first working with Intus³ to waiting control groups that wrote an expository text based on empirical research discussing the relevance of teacher-student relationships with a longitudinal design with four measurement points. Latent change models showed that prior work with Intus³ showed few effects but complex effects in comparison to the prior text work groups. In the larger and extended study 2, an increase of empathic concern was significant after the prior work with Intus³. The results will be discussed with the perspective of the potential of further development of online training courses for affective learning for teachers and teacher students.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KobsEhlertLenkeitetal.2022,
  author    = {Kobs, Scarlett and Ehlert, Antje and Lenkeit, Jenny and Hartmann, Anne Therese and Sporer, Nadine and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {The influence of individual and situational factors on teachers' justice ratings of classroom interactions},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.789110},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Teachers, as role models, are crucial in promoting inclusion in society through their actions. Being perceived as fair by their students is linked to students' feelings of belonging in school. In addition, their decisions of resource allocations also affect students' academic success. Both aspects underpin the importance of teachers' views on justice. This article aims to investigate what teachers consider to be just and how teacher characteristics and situational factors affect justice ratings of hypothetical student-teacher-interactions. In an experimental design, we randomly varied the description of the interacting student in text vignettes regarding his/her special educational need (SEN) (situational factor). We also collected data on teachers' attitudes toward inclusion and experiences with persons with disabilities (individual factors). A sample of in-service teachers in Germany (N = 2,254) rated randomized versions of two text vignettes. To also consider the effect of professional status, a sample of pre-service teachers (N = 275) did the same. Linear mixed effect models point to a negative effect of the SEN on justice ratings, meaning situations in which the interacting student is described with a SEN were rated less just compared to the control condition. As the interacting student in the situations was treated worse than the rest, this was indicative for the application of the need principle. Teachers with more positive attitudes toward inclusion rated the vignettes as significantly less just. Professional status also had a negative effect on justice ratings, with in-service teachers rating the interactions significantly lower than the pre-service teachers. Our results suggest that the teachers applied the principle of need in their ratings. Implications for inclusive teaching practices and future research are discussed further.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DonatKniggeDalbert2017,
  author    = {Donat, Matthias and Knigge, Michel and Dalbert, Claudia},
  title     = {Being a good or a just teacher},
  series = {Aggressive behavior : a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Aggressive behavior : a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0096-140X},
  doi       = {10.1002/ab.21721},
  pages     = {29 -- 39},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In two cross-sectional questionnaire studies with N = 2,931 German students, aged between 12 and 17 years (M = 14.1, SD = 0.5), we investigated the relation between students' bullying behavior and their personal belief in a just world (BJW). We considered students' personal experience of teacher justice as a possible mediator in this relation and investigated whether the students' experiences of their teachers' classroom management explained bullying behavior in addition to personal BJW and teacher justice, while statistically controlling for sex and school type. In both studies, multilevel modeling results showed that the more students endorsed personal BJW and the more they evaluated their teachers' behavior toward them personally as being just, the less likely they were to report that they bullied others. The students' personal experience of teacher justice mediated the association of personal BJW with bullying. Furthermore, the students' personal experience of classroom management significantly predicted bullying in addition to personal BJW and teacher justice. The observed relations were mainly significant at the individual level. The pattern of results persisted when we controlled for school type and when we considered student sex as a moderator. We discussed the adaptive functions of BJW and implications for future school research and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LenkeitSchwippertKnigge2018,
  author    = {Lenkeit, Jenny and Schwippert, Knut and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Configurations of multiple disparities in reading performance},
  series = {Assessment in education : principles, policy \& practice},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Assessment in education : principles, policy \& practice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0969-594X},
  doi       = {10.1080/0969594X.2017.1309352},
  pages     = {52 -- 86},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Research provides evidence that gender, immigrant background and socio-economic characteristics present multiple disadvantaging characteristics that change their relative importance and configurations over time. When evaluating inequalities researchers tend to focus on one particular aspect and often use composite measures when evaluating socio-economic characteristics. Neither can fully represent the complexity of students' various disadvantaging characteristics, which have autonomous associations with attainment and with each other. This paper investigates how the relative importance and configurations of different disadvantaging factors have changed over time to form educational inequalities and how these changes differ across countries. Data from five PISA cycles (2000-2012) for France, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom are used and configurations of gender, immigration background, parents' occupational and educational levels, and the number of books at home evaluated. Results enable us to relate changes (or lack thereof) in configurations of disadvantaging factors to recent reforms targeted at reducing educational inequality after the first PISA results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SpoererLenkeitBosseetal.2020,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Students' perspective on inclusion},
  series = {International journal of educational research},
  volume    = {103},
  journal   = {International journal of educational research},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0883-0355},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101641},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The goal of the present study was to analyze how students' attitudes towards inclusive education develop over the course of a school year and how these attitudes relate to students' peer relations. Sixth- and seventh-graders of 44 inclusive classes filled out a questionnaire at two measurement points within one school year to assess attitudes towards inclusive education and peer relations. Applying multilevel regression analyses it turned out that changes in peer relations over time were positively predicted by students' attitudes towards instructional adaptations for students with behaviour difficulties. Further, students with self-perceived behavior difficulties reported lower scores for peer relations compared to students without self-perceived difficulties. Results are discussed with respect to structural factors and individual characteristics affecting inclusive education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DuenkelKniggeWilbert2020,
  author    = {D{\"u}nkel, Nora and Knigge, Michel and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Determinanten und Akkuratheit von Sch{\"u}lerurteilen {\"u}ber sprachliche F{\"a}higkeiten von Mitsch{\"u}ler(inne)n im Deutschen und den Herkunftssprachen T{\"u}rkisch und Russisch},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-020-00972-8},
  pages     = {1019 -- 1052},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Models of language acquisition suggest that the development of language abilities is influenced by the language skills of relevant interaction partners (e.g. peers). Because objective measures of interaction partners' language skills are rarely available, third party ratings may be an alternative measure. Therefore, the present study investigates students' ratings of their fellow students' language skills as indicators of actual language performance in German and the heritage languages Turkish and Russian. Multilevel models were applied to address the following questions: Which factors influence students' ratings of peers' language skills? How accurate are these ratings and what influences the accuracy of ratings? In all languages, students' ratings were moderately related to peers' test performance and the accuracy of ratings was positively moderated if the students had class together, shared the same language background and with increasing relationship quality. The ratings for German language abilities further revealed negative performance related stereotypes towards peers with Turkish and Russian language backgrounds. The results are discussed with respect to possibilities and boundaries of assessing peers' language skills through student ratings and implications of negative performance related stereotypes.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KuninaHabenichtHautzKniggeetal.2015,
  author    = {Kunina-Habenicht, Olga and Hautz, Wolf E. and Knigge, Michel and Spies, Claudia and Ahlers, Olaf},
  title     = {Assessing clinical reasoning (ASCLIRE): Instrument development and validation},
  series = {Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1382-4996},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10459-015-9596-y},
  pages     = {1205 -- 1224},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Clinical reasoning is an essential competency in medical education. This study aimed at developing and validating a test to assess diagnostic accuracy, collected information, and diagnostic decision time in clinical reasoning. A norm-referenced computer-based test for the assessment of clinical reasoning (ASCLIRE) was developed, integrating the entire clinical decision process. In a cross-sectional study participants were asked to choose as many diagnostic measures as they deemed necessary to diagnose the underlying disease of six different cases with acute or sub-acute dyspnea and provide a diagnosis. 283 students and 20 content experts participated. In addition to diagnostic accuracy, respective decision time and number of used relevant diagnostic measures were documented as distinct performance indicators. The empirical structure of the test was investigated using a structural equation modeling approach. Experts showed higher accuracy rates and lower decision times than students. In a cross-sectional comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of students improved with the year of study. Wrong diagnoses provided by our sample were comparable to wrong diagnoses in practice. We found an excellent fit for a model with three latent factors-diagnostic accuracy, decision time, and choice of relevant diagnostic information-with diagnostic accuracy showing no significant correlation with decision time. ASCLIRE considers decision time as an important performance indicator beneath diagnostic accuracy and provides evidence that clinical reasoning is a complex ability comprising diagnostic accuracy, decision time, and choice of relevant diagnostic information as three partly correlated but still distinct aspects.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KniggeKrauskopfWagner2019,
  author    = {Knigge, Michel and Krauskopf, Karsten and Wagner, Simon},
  title     = {Improving Socio-Emotional Competencies Using a Staged Video-Based Learning Program?},
  series = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Education},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2019.00142},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Relationship quality between teachers and their students is a critical aspect for well-being and effective learning in school. Accordingly, teacher training should promote competencies for creating and maintaining positive relationships in the classroom. The Helga Breuninger Foundation developed a video-based online training (Intus³) that intends to focus on student teachers' interpersonal competencies by reflecting on staged videos. Although this training is well-designed, there is only little empirical evidence in general and so far no experimental research investigating the effects of Intus³. Accordingly, we investigated whether this program is able to improve the capacities of student teachers' interpersonal competencies, affective well-being, and affective attitudes toward challenging students. We conducted two randomized experimental studies (n1 = 132, n2 = 242) within lectures in teacher education at the University of Potsdam, introducing the basics of inclusive education in two consecutive semesters. We compared groups first working with Intus³ to waiting control groups that wrote an expository text based on empirical research discussing the relevance of teacher-student relationships with a longitudinal design with four measurement points. Latent change models showed that prior work with Intus³ showed few effects but complex effects in comparison to the prior text work groups. In the larger and extended study 2, an increase of empathic concern was significant after the prior work with Intus³. The results will be discussed with the perspective of the potential of further development of online training courses for affective learning for teachers and teacher students.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{KrauskopfRoggeSalzbergLudwigetal.2019,
  author    = {Krauskopf, Karsten and Rogge, Franziska and Salzberg-Ludwig, Karin and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {F{\"o}rderplanung im Team f{\"u}r die Sekundarstufe (FiT-S)},
  publisher = {Reinhardt},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-497-02889-4},
  pages     = {124},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LenkeitHartmannEhlertetal.2022,
  author    = {Lenkeit, Jenny and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on academic achievement},
  series = {International Journal of Educational Research},
  volume    = {113},
  journal   = {International Journal of Educational Research},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0883-0355},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101957},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Germany is continuously expanding its inclusive education system. Research provides evidence that students with special educational needs (SEN) in inclusive school settings show lower academic achievement and come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds than their peers without SEN. Identifying to what extent the disadvantages originating from both characteristics are confounded in predicting academic achievement, has been neglected in the German educational context. Using data of 1711 primary and secondary school students from a longitudinal study in the state of Brandenburg, this study evaluates to what degree SEN (in the areas of learning and emotional-social difficulties) and socioeconomic background (SES) are confounded in predicting academic initial achievement in reading and mathematics as well as their development over time. Using multilevel modelling techniques that nest three measurement points into students and students into classes, results identify SES and SEN as relevant predictors of achievement status and growth in both subjects. Only few and small mediation effects of SES were found, indicating that both SES and SEN remain independent risk factors for achievement. Understanding the origins of student disadvantage can help teachers to make better informed choices for designing support measures and aid policymakers' reasoning for resource allocations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrauskopfKitschkeMaaretal.2022,
  author    = {Krauskopf, Karsten and Kitschke, Dorothea and Maar, Verena and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Inklusion in außerunterrichtlichen Kontexten erfahren und reflektieren},
  series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)},
  journal   = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-508-8},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57073},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570736},
  pages     = {67 -- 89},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Im Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung stellt das Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern (PppH) die zweite der f{\"u}nf vorgesehenen Praxisphasen dar. Die Ziele des PppH sind (1) Sensibilisierung f{\"u}r Heterogenit{\"a}t und Inklusion, (2) Unterst{\"u}tzung bei der Entwicklung einer forschenden Haltung und (3) F{\"o}rderung von (Selbst-)Reflexion. Konkret wird das außerunterrichtliche Praktikum durch w{\"o}chentliche Seminarsitzungen vor- und anschließende Blockveranstaltung nachbereitet. Alle PppH-Veranstaltungen wurden vom WS 15/16 bis WS 17/18 in einer Begleitforschung mit jeweils mehreren Messzeitpunkten eingerahmt. F{\"u}r die vorliegende Arbeit wurden zwei kontinuierlich korrespondierenden Messzeitpunkte ausgew{\"a}hlt und {\"u}ber vier Semesterkohorten aggregiert. In einem quasi-experimentellen Pr{\"a}-Post-Design zeigen die empirischen Ergebnisse insgesamt positive Einstellungen und relative hohe Selbstwirksamkeit sowie einige positive Pr{\"a}-Post-Entwicklungen von kleiner Effektst{\"a}rke.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HermannsBoehmeMeyeringetal.2023,
  author    = {Hermanns, Jolanda and B{\"o}hme, Katrin and Meyering, Meike and Fuchs, Isabelle and Wagner, Simon and Krauskopf, Karsten and Knigge, Michel and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Wulff, Peter and Mientus, Lukas and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas and Baer, Ella and Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Br{\"a}sel, Tim and Fenn, Monika and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Kuzle, Ana and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Burg, Paula and Lampart, Fabian and Leubner, Martin and Freitag-Hild, Britta and Bitmann, Anna and Reinhardt, Susanne and Roos, Jana and Hußner, Isabell and B{\"o}rner, Dustin and Lazarides, Rebecca and Glowinski, Ingrid and Autenrieth, Marijke and Radke, Thea and Ehlert, Antje and Menke, Anne and Haupenthal, Anna and Schramm, Satyam Antonio and Kruse, Julia and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Fischer, Jakob Thomas and Kayser, Daniela Niesta},
  title     = {PSI-Potsdam},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {3},
  editor    = {Hermanns, Jolanda},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60187},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601875},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {393},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wird seit 2015 im Rahmen der „Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" das Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) durchgef{\"u}hrt und am Zentrum f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) koordiniert. Zur ersten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2015-2018) erschien der Band „PSI-Potsdam - Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2015-2018)" zum Auftakt der Reihe „Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung". Der vorliegende Band aus der gleichen Reihe gibt in den Kapiteln „Erhebungen", „Lehrkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber alle Teilprojekte der zweiten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2019-2023). Wissenschaftler:innen aus verschiedenen Fachdidaktiken, Fachwissenschaften sowie aus den Bildungswissenschaften und der Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik haben im Rahmen des Projektes kooperiert. Sowohl praxisnahe Forschung als auch die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte sowie Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung stehen im Fokus dieses Bandes. Die Praxisphasen, die im Rahmen des „Potsdamer Modells der Lehrerbildung" eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wurden in einer großen Studie {\"u}ber alle Praxisphasen untersucht. Der Band gibt interessante Einblicke in die Ergebnisse der Teilprojekte und Anregungen sowohl f{\"u}r die eigene Forschung als auch f{\"u}r Entwicklungsarbeit wie zum Beispiel die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte. Herausgegeben wird dieser Band von PD Dr. Jolanda Hermanns (Gesamtkoordinatorin PSI-Potsdam und Chemiedidaktikerin).},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{JennekRotherToschetal.2022,
  author    = {Jennek, Julia and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Kludt, Steffen and Krauskopf, Karsten and Kitschke, Dorothea and Maar, Verena and Knigge, Michel and Gn{\"a}dig, Susanne and Seidel, Astrid and Siehr, Karl-Heinz and Wienecke, Maik and G{\"u}nther, Claudia-Susanne and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Klöpping, Peter M. and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Lazarides, Rebecca and Westphal, Andrea and Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Gronostaj, Anna and Vock, Miriam and Zaruba, Nicole and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Link, J{\"o}rg-Werner and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Barseghyan, Anahit and Glowinski, Ingrid},
  title     = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {2},
  editor    = {Jennek, Julia},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-508-8},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-50096},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-500964},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {321},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Schulpraktika bilden die zentrale Grundlage der Lehrerbildung in Potsdam. Bereits im Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung (1993) sind sie festgehalten, seit der Integration des Schulpraktikums (Praxissemesters) 2008 absolvieren alle Potsdamer Lehramtsstudierenden f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika. W{\"a}hrend die Ziele der Praktika klar beschrieben sind, sind die tats{\"a}chlichen Lernerfolge nicht immer klar - ebenso wenig, wie die Begleitung der Praktika aussehen muss, um die Studierenden bestm{\"o}glich zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Auch die Integration in weitere Lehrveranstaltungen des Studiums ist ein noch offenes Feld, das weiterer Betrachtung verdient. Die unterschiedliche Ausrichtung der Potsdamer Praktika, Perspektivwechsel im Orientierungs-/Integriertem Eingangspraktikum, Selbstreflektion im Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern, Unterricht als Profession in den Fachdidaktischen Tagespraktika, Anwendung von Diagnostik im psychodiagnostischen Praktikum und die Synthese all dessen im Schulpraktikum, bieten daf{\"u}r zahlreiche Ansatzpunkte. Schulpraktika sind nicht nur ein zentraler und von Studierenden hoch gesch{\"a}tzter Bestandteil des Studiums, sondern werden auch zunehmend f{\"u}r die Bildungsforschung interessant. Fragen nach der Kompetenzentwicklung, Selbsteinsch{\"a}tzungen und der Entwicklung der Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit von Studierenden stehen dabei ebenso im Fokus wie die Einsch{\"a}tzung der universit{\"a}ren Begleitung und der Einbindung ins weitere Studium. Der vorliegende Band versammelt Studien von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, die die f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika im Lehramtsstudium unter unterschiedlichen Blickwinkel beforschen. Besonders hervorzuheben ist, dass die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen stammen und somit die Praktika mit verschiedenen Instrumenten und aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln betrachten. Die pr{\"a}sentierten Ergebnisse bilden eine gute Grundlage, um die Praktika in Potsdam und an anderen Standorten weiterzuentwickeln.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WagnerKrauskopfKnigge2023,
  author    = {Wagner, Simon and Krauskopf, Karsten and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Kollegiale Fallbesprechung anhand erfahrungsbasierter Textvignetten p{\"a}dagogischer Situationen in der (inklusionsorientierten) Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung},
  series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  journal   = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-61619},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-616194},
  pages     = {37 -- 52},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Lehramtsstudierende {\"a}ußern vielfach den Wunsch nach umfangreichen praktischen Lerngelegenheiten. Insbesondere fallbasierte Lehr-Lern-Konzepte scheinen diesen Anspr{\"u}chen gerecht zu werden. Dieser Beitrag stellt ein an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam entwickeltes Seminarkonzept vor, welches diesen Transfer zu f{\"o}rdern versucht. Die Basis des Konzepts bildet der Einsatz erfahrungsbasiert entwickelter Textvignetten p{\"a}dagogischer Situationen. Im Rahmen der Begleitseminare zum Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern (PppH) wurde die kollegiale Fallbesprechung als eine Form zur angestrebten Transferf{\"o}rderung in dieses Seminarkonzept integriert. Dieser Beitrag skizziert zun{\"a}chst die erfahrungsbasierte Entwicklung der Vignetten sowie die theoretischen Grundlagen des Seminarkonzepts. Im Anschluss werden die praktische Implementation und erfahrungsbasierte konzeptionelle {\"A}nderung (design-based-research) in der Lehre beschrieben sowie erste Ergebnisse der systematischen empirischen Erprobung im Rahmen des PppH vorgestellt. Abschließend diskutieren die Autoren die Herausforderungen der praktischen Umsetzung auch mit Blick auf das Verstetigungsvorhaben.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Knigge2020,
  author    = {Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Use of evidence to promote inclusive education development commentary on Mel Ainscow. Promoting inclusion and equity in education},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51914},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-519142},
  pages     = {6},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In his essay, Mel Ainscow looks at inclusion and equity from an international perspective and makes suggestions on how to develop inclusive education in a 'whole-system approach'. After discussing different conceptions of inclusion and equity, he describes international policies which address them. From this international macro-level, Ainscow zooms in to the meso-level of the school and its immediate environment, defining dimensions to be considered for an inclusive school development. One of these dimensions is the 'use of evidence'. In my comment, I want to focus on this dimension and discuss its scope and the potential to apply it in inclusive education development. As a first and important precondition, Ainscow explains that different circumstances lead to different linguistic uses of the term 'inclusive education'. Thus, the term 'inclusive education' does not refer to an identical set of objectives across countries, and neither does the term 'equity'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Knigge2020,
  author    = {Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Use of evidence to promote inclusive education development commentary on Mel Ainscow. Promoting inclusion and equity in education},
  series = {Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2002-0317},
  doi       = {10.1080/20020317.2020.1730093},
  pages     = {21 -- 24},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In his essay, Mel Ainscow looks at inclusion and equity from an international perspective and makes suggestions on how to develop inclusive education in a 'whole-system approach'. After discussing different conceptions of inclusion and equity, he describes international policies which address them. From this international macro-level, Ainscow zooms in to the meso-level of the school and its immediate environment, defining dimensions to be considered for an inclusive school development. One of these dimensions is the 'use of evidence'. In my comment, I want to focus on this dimension and discuss its scope and the potential to apply it in inclusive education development. As a first and important precondition, Ainscow explains that different circumstances lead to different linguistic uses of the term 'inclusive education'. Thus, the term 'inclusive education' does not refer to an identical set of objectives across countries, and neither does the term 'equity'.},
  language  = {en}
}