@article{VoelzkeStutzigThorhaueretal.2012,
  author    = {Voelzke, Mathias and Stutzig, Norman and Thorhauer, Hans-Alexander and Granacher, Urs},
  title     = {Promoting lower extremity strength in elite volleyball players: Effects of two combined training methods},
  series = {JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {ELSEVIER SCI LTD},
  address   = {OXFORD},
  issn      = {1440-2440},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.004},
  pages     = {457 -- 462},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Objectives: To compare the impact of short term training with resistance plus plyometric training (RT+P) or electromyostimulation plus plyometric training (EMS+P) on explosive force production in elite volleyball players. Design: Sixteen elite volleyball players of the first German division participated in a training study. Methods: The participants were randomly assigned to either the RT+P training group (n = 8) or the EMS+P training group (n= 8). Both groups participated in a 5-week lower extremity exercise program. Pre and post tests included squat jumps (Si), countermovement jumps (CMJ), and drop jumps (DJ) on a force plate. The three-step reach height (RH) was assessed using a custom-made vertec apparatus. Fifteen m straight and lateral sprint (S15s and S15l) were assessed using photoelectric cells with interims at 5 m and 10 m. Results: RT+P training resulted in significant improvements in Si (+2.3\%) and RH (+0.4\%) performance. The EMS+P training group showed significant increases in performance of CMJ (+3.8\%), DJ (+6.4\%), RH (+1.6\%), S15l (-3.8\%) and after 5 m and 10 m of the S15s (-2.6\%; -0.5\%). The comparison of training-induced changes between the two intervention groups revealed significant differences for the Si (p = 0.023) in favor of RT+P and for the S15s after 5 m (p = 0.006) in favor of EMS+P. Conclusions: The results indicate that RT+P training is effective in promoting jump performances and EMS+P training increases jump, speed and agility performances of elite volleyball players. (c) 2012 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KoenigBlockBeckeretal.2018,
  author    = {K{\"o}nig, Johanna and Block, Andrea and Becker, Mathias and Fenske, Kristin and Hertel, Johannes and Van der Auwera, Sandra and Zymara, Kathleen and Voelzke, Henry and Freyberger, Harald J{\"u}rgen and Grabe, Hans Joergen},
  title     = {Assessment of subjective emotional valence and long-lasting impact of life events},
  series = {BMC Psychiatry},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {BMC Psychiatry},
  publisher = {BioMed Central},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1471-244X},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12888-018-1649-3},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Life events (LEs) are associated with future physical and mental health. They are crucial for understanding the pathways to mental disorders as well as the interactions with biological parameters. However, deeper insight is needed into the complex interplay between the type of LE, its subjective evaluation and accompanying factors such as social support. The "Stralsund Life Event List" (SEL) was developed to facilitate this research. Methods: The SEL is a standardized interview that assesses the time of occurrence and frequency of 81 LEs, their subjective emotional valence, the perceived social support during the LE experience and the impact of past LEs on present life. Data from 2265 subjects from the general population-based cohort study "Study of Health in Pomerania" (SHIP) were analysed. Based on the mean emotional valence ratings of the whole sample, LEs were categorized as "positive" or "negative". For verification, the SEL was related to lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD; Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview), childhood trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), resilience (Resilience Scale) and subjective health (SF-12 Health Survey). Conclusions: The SEL is a valid instrument that enables the analysis of the number and frequency of LEs, their emotional valence, perceived social support and current impact on life on a global score and on an individual item level. Thus, we can recommend its use in research settings that require the assessment and analysis of the relationship between the occurrence and subjective evaluation of LEs as well as the complex balance between distressing and stabilizing life experiences.},
  language  = {en}
}