@misc{Hoch2002,
  author    = {Hoch, Martin},
  title     = {Die R{\"u}ckkehr des Mittelalters in der Sicherheitspolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9854},
  year      = {2002},
  abstract  = {"Small wars" will play an increasing role in the conflict scenarios of the 21st century, at the expense of inter-state wars. One of the key features of future war is the difficult differentiation between civilian and military targets, between combatants and noncombatants. It is argued that the parallel (and competing) structures of both states and non-state actors using force openly and equally will be a permanent feature of international security policy in the 21st century. This development is tantamount to the dissolution of the monopoly on the legitimate use of force by the states. The state-centered system of international relations has been a distinctive hallmark of the modern period. It is bound to give way, however, to the parallel and competing structures of state actors and non-state actors which was a central attribute of the Middle Ages. Jahresabo: 40,00 € (erm{\"a}ßigt: 25,00 €)},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EbersHochRosenkranzetal.2021,
  author    = {Ebers, Martin and Hoch, Veronica R. S. and Rosenkranz, Frank and Ruschemeier, Hannah and Steinr{\"o}tter, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Der Entwurf f{\"u}r eine EU-KI-Verordnung: richtige Richtung mit Optimierungsbedarf},
  series = {Recht Digital},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {Recht Digital},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {2702-2404},
  pages     = {528 -- 537},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Am 21.4.2021 legte die Europ{\"a}ische Kommission (KOM) ihren lang erwarteten Vorschlag f{\"u}r eine Verordnung zur Regulierung von K{\"u}nstlicher Intelligenz (KI) vor. Der Beitrag arbeitet neuralgische Aspekte des Entwurfstextes aus der Sicht von RAILS e. V. heraus.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EbersHochRosenkranzetal.2021,
  author    = {Ebers, Martin and Hoch, Veronica R. S. and Rosenkranz, Frank and Ruschemeier, Hannah and Steinr{\"o}tter, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {The European Commission's proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act},
  series = {J : multidisciplinary scientific journal},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {J : multidisciplinary scientific journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2571-8800},
  doi       = {10.3390/j4040043},
  pages     = {589 -- 603},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {On 21 April 2021, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a Regulation "laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence", the so-called "Artificial Intelligence Act" (AIA). This article takes a critical look at the proposed regulation. After an introduction (1), the paper analyzes the unclear preemptive effect of the AIA and EU competences (2), the scope of application (3), the prohibited uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI) (4), the provisions on high-risk AI systems (5), the obligations of providers and users (6), the requirements for AI systems with limited risks (7), the enforcement system (8), the relationship of the AIA with the existing legal framework (9), and the regulatory gaps (10). The last section draws some final conclusions (11).},
  language  = {en}
}