@article{ReibisSchlittGlatzetal.2016,
  author    = {Reibis, Rona Katharina and Schlitt, A. and Glatz, J. and Langheim, E. H. and Guha, M. and Halle, M. and Boscheri, A. and Hegeler-Molkewehrum, C. and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Rehabilitation in Heart Failure},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0042-103302},
  pages     = {115 -- 129},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Kernaussagen: - Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz (HF-rEF, HF-pEF oder in Kombination) stellen einen relevanten Anteil von Patienten in kardiologischen Rehabilitationseinrichtungen dar. Sie erfordern aufgrund der eingeschr{\"a}nkten Ventrikelfunktion, der Arrhythmieneigung sowie den h{\"a}ufig implantierten elektrischen Aggregaten ein multimodales Therapiekonzept. - Neben der leitlinienorientierten Pharmakotherapie nehmen die individualisierte Trainingstherapie und die psychosoziale Betreuung tragende Funktionen in der Rehabilitation herzinsuffizienter Patienten ein. - Die berufliche Wiedereingliederung wird durch die h{\"a}modynamische Stabilit{\"a}t, die kognitiven Leistungen, die Arbeitsplatzanforderungen und Arbeitsplatzsicherheit insbesondere bei ICD/CRT-Tr{\"a}gern determiniert. - Die Fahreignung wird {\"u}berwiegend in Einzelfallentscheidungen bestimmt und richtet sich u. a. nach der linksventrikul{\"a}ren Pumpleistung und dem arrhythmiefreien Intervall.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MeyerPtacnikHillebrandetal.2017,
  author    = {Meyer, Sebastian Tobias and Ptacnik, Robert and Hillebrand, Helmut and Bessler, Holger and Buchmann, Nina and Ebeling, Anne and Eisenhauer, Nico and Engels, Christof and Fischer, Markus and Halle, Stefan and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Oelmann, Yvonne and Roscher, Christiane and Rottstock, Tanja and Scherber, Christoph and Scheu, Stefan and Schmid, Bernhard and Schulze, Ernst-Detlef and Temperton, Vicky M. and Tscharntke, Teja and Voigt, Winfried and Weigelt, Alexandra and Wilcke, Wolfgang and Weisser, Wolfgang W.},
  title     = {Biodiversity-multifunctionality relationships depend on identity and number of measured functions},
  series = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2397-334X},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41559-017-0391-4},
  pages     = {44 -- 49},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Biodiversity ensures ecosystem functioning and provisioning of ecosystem services, but it remains unclear how biodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality relationships depend on the identity and number of functions considered. Here, we demonstrate that ecosystem multifunctionality, based on 82 indicator variables of ecosystem functions in a grassland biodiversity experiment, increases strongly with increasing biodiversity. Analysing subsets of functions showed that the effects of biodiversity on multifunctionality were stronger when more functions were included and that the strength of the biodiversity effects depended on the identity of the functions included. Limits to multifunctionality arose from negative correlations among functions and functions that were not correlated with biodiversity. Our findings underline that the management of ecosystems for the protection of biodiversity cannot be replaced by managing for particular ecosystem functions or services and emphasize the need for specific management to protect biodiversity. More plant species from the experimental pool of 60 species contributed to functioning when more functions were considered. An individual contribution to multifunctionality could be demonstrated for only a fraction of the species.},
  language  = {en}
}