@article{Liese2013,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {The power of human rights decade after: from euphoria to contestation?},
  isbn      = {978-1-10-760936-5},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLiese2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {Summing up : key findings and avenues for future research},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LieseReiners2019,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit and Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {The Eye of the Beholder?},
  series = {The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline?},
  journal   = {The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline?},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  isbn      = {0191879398},
  doi       = {10.1093/oso/9780198843603.003.0021},
  pages     = {335 -- 343},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuschFeilHeinzeletal.2021,
  author    = {Busch, Per-Olof and Feil, Hauke and Heinzel, Mirko Noa and Herold, Jana and Kempken, Mathies and Liese, Andrea},
  title     = {Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {87},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Los Angeles, Calif.},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/00208523211013385},
  pages     = {775 -- 793},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Many international bureaucracies give policy advice to national administrative units. Why is the advice given by some international bureaucracies more influential than the recommendations of others? We argue that targeting advice to member states through national embeddedness and country-tailored research increases the influence of policy advice. Subsequently, we test how these characteristics shape the relative influence of 15 international bureaucracies' advice in four financial policy areas through a global survey of national administrations from more than 80 countries. Our findings support arguments that global blueprints need to be adapted and translated to become meaningful for country-level work. <br /> Points for practitioners <br /> National administrations are advised by an increasing number of international bureaucracies, and they cannot listen to all of this advice. Whereas some international bureaucracies give 'one-size-fits-all' recommendations to rather diverse countries, others cater their recommendations to the national audience. Investigating financial policy recommendations, we find that national embeddedness and country-tailored advice render international bureaucracies more influential.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Liese2022,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea},
  title     = {Rezension zu: The power of global performance indicators / Hrsg.: Judith G. Kelley ; Beth A. Simmons. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. - 450 p.},
  series = {Perspectives on politics / American Political Science Association},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Perspectives on politics / American Political Science Association},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  isbn      = {978-1-108-48720-7},
  issn      = {1537-5927},
  doi       = {10.1017/S1537592721003716},
  pages     = {380 -- 382},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuschLiese2016,
  author    = {Busch, Per-Olof and Liese, Andrea},
  title     = {The authority of international public administrations},
  series = {International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research},
  journal   = {International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research},
  publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan, London},
  address   = {Basingstoke},
  isbn      = {978-1-349-94977-9},
  doi       = {10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5},
  pages     = {97 -- 122},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This chapter takes stock with the research on the authority of international organizations (IOs) and international public administrations (IPAs) in the fields of International Relations (IR) and Public Administration (PA). It combines arguments from conceptual and theoretical debates with empirical findings to explore under which conditions IPAs are likely to enjoy authority. Based on a review of the literature and on conceptual clarifications, we define authority as a social relationship between holders and granters of authority. We distinguish two types of authority, namely, political and expert authority, and two forms of recognition, namely, in practice (de facto) and by formal delegation (de jure). Given that the de facto expert authority of IPAs has received least attention in the literature, while the PA literature reminds us that knowledge lies at the heart of bureaucratic power, we develop propositions on how de facto expert authority could be measured and how the anticipated variation of expert authority among IPAs could be explained. We illustrate our argument with reference to empirical findings in the IR and PA literature. We conclude by highlighting the implications of our discussion for future research on the authority of national and IPAs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{KriegerLiese2019,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Krieger, Heike and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {A Metamorphosis of International Law?},
  series = {KFG Working Paper Series},
  journal   = {KFG Working Paper Series},
  number    = {27},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42608},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426088},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The paper aims to lay out a framework for evaluating value shifts in the international legal order for the purposes of a forthcoming book. In view of current contestations it asks whether we are observing yet another period of norm change (Wandel) or even a more fundamental transformation of international law - a metamorphosis (Verwandlung). For this purpose it suggests to look into the mechanisms of how norms change from the perspective of legal and political science and also to approximate a reference point where change turns into metamorphosis. It submits that such a point may be reached where specific legally protected values are indeed changing (change of legal values) or where the very idea of protecting certain values through law is renounced (delegalizing of values). The paper discusses the benefits of such an interdisciplinary exchange and tries to identify differences and commonalities among both disciplinary perspectives.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LieseHeroldFeiletal.2021,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea and Herold, Jana and Feil, Hauke and Busch, Per-Olof},
  title     = {The heart of bureaucratic power},
  series = {Review of international studies : RIS},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Review of international studies : RIS},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0260-2105},
  doi       = {10.1017/S026021052100005X},
  pages     = {353 -- 376},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Expert authority is regarded as the heart of international bureaucracies' power. To measure whether international bureaucracies' expert authority is indeed recognised and deferred to, we draw on novel data from a survey of a key audience: officials in the policy units of national ministries in 121 countries. Respondents were asked to what extent they recognised the expert authority of nine international bureaucracies in various thematic areas of agricultural and financial policy. The results show wide variance. To explain this variation, we test well-established assumptions on the sources of de facto expert authority. Specifically, we look at ministry officials' perceptions of these sources and, thus, focus on a less-studied aspect of the authority relationship. We examine the role of international bureaucracies' perceived impartiality, objectivity, global impact, and the role of knowledge asymmetries. Contrary to common assumptions, we find that de facto expert authority does not rest on impartiality perceptions, and that perceived objectivity plays the smallest role of all factors considered. We find some indications that knowledge asymmetries are associated with more expert authority. Still, and robust to various alternative specifications, the perception that international bureaucracies are effectively addressing global challenges is the most important factor.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Liese2015,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {Transnationale Akteure/Nichtregierungsorganisationen},
  series = {Handw{\"o}rterbuch Internationale Politik},
  journal   = {Handw{\"o}rterbuch Internationale Politik},
  editor    = {Woyke, Wichard and Varwick, Johannes},
  edition   = {13. vollst. {\"u}berarb. u. aktual. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Budrich},
  address   = {Opladen},
  isbn      = {978-3-8252-4518-4},
  doi       = {10.36198/9783838545189},
  pages     = {480 -- 489},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HeinzelLiese2021,
  author    = {Heinzel, Mirko Noa and Liese, Andrea},
  title     = {Expert authority and support for COVID-19 measures in Germany and the UK},
  series = {West European politics},
  journal   = {West European politics},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0140-2382},
  doi       = {10.1080/01402382.2021.1873630},
  pages     = {1258 -- 1282},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {During COVID-19, various public institutions tried to shape citizens' behaviour to slow the spread of the pandemic. How did their authority affect citizens' support of public measures taken to combat the spread of COVID-19? The article makes two contributions. First, it presents a novel conceptualisation of authority as a source heuristic. Second, it analyses the authority of four types of public institutions (health ministries, universities, public health agencies, the WHO) in two countries (Germany and the UK), drawing on novel data from a survey experiment conducted in May 2020. On average, institutional endorsements seem to have mattered little. However, there is an observable polarisation effect where citizens who ascribe much expertise to public institutions support COVID-19 measures more than the control group. Furthermore, those who ascribe little expertise support them less than the control group. Finally, neither perception of biases nor exposure to institutions in public debates seems consistently to affect their authority.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BuehrerFastenrathHaussigetal.2011,
  author    = {B{\"u}hrer, Torben and Fastenrath, Ulrich and Haußig, Hans-Michael and Hoffmann, Jan Martin and Kashgar, Maral and Ladwig, Bernd and Liese, Andrea Margit and L{\"o}hr, Tillmann and Sch{\"a}fer, Bernhard and Scharlau, Maria and Teichmann, Michael},
  title     = {MenschenRechtsMagazin : Informationen | Meinungen | Analysen},
  volume    = {16},
  number    = {2},
  editor    = {Gunnarsson, Logi and Klein, Eckart and Zimmermann, Andreas},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1434-2820},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-55522},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Aus dem Inhalt: - Neue Entwicklungen im regionalen Menschenrechtsschutz: eine politikwissenschaftliche Betrachtung des institutionellen Designs und der Dynamik des derzeitigen menschenrechtlichen Regionalismus - Das menschenrechtliche Diskriminierungsverbot und seine Grenzen - Die Individualbeschwerde zur Kinderrechtskonvention - BVerfG: Fraport - Urteil vom 22. Februar 2011},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HeroldLieseBuschetal.2021,
  author    = {Herold, Jana and Liese, Andrea and Busch, Per-Olof and Feil, Hauke},
  title     = {Why national ministries consider the policy advice of international bureaucracies},
  series = {International studies quarterly : the journal of the International Studies Association},
  volume    = {65},
  journal   = {International studies quarterly : the journal of the International Studies Association},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0020-8833},
  doi       = {10.1093/isq/sqab044},
  pages     = {669 -- 682},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Scholars of international relations and public administration widely assume that international bureaucracies, in their role as policy advisors, directly influence countries' domestic policies. Yet, this is not true across the board. Why do some countries closely consider the advice of international bureaucracies while others do not? This article argues that international bureaucracies' standing as sources of expertise is crucial. We tested this argument using data from a unique survey that measured prevalent practices of advice utilization in thematically specialized policy units of national ministries in a representative sample of more than a hundred countries. Our findings show that ministries' perceptions of international bureaucracies' expertise, that is, specialized and reliable knowledge, are the key factor. International bureaucracies influence national ministries directly and without the support of other actors that may also have an interest in the international bureaucracies' policy advice. Our analysis also demonstrates that the effects of alternative means of influence, such as third-party pressure and coercion, are themselves partly dependent on international bureaucracies' reputation as experts. The findings presented in this article reinforce the emphasis on expertise as a source of international bureaucracies' influence, and provide a crucial test of its importance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseLorch2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Lorch, Jasmin},
  title     = {Introduction : transnationale partnerships for sustainable development},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LieseBeisheim2014,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit and Beisheim, Marianne},
  title     = {Research design : measuring and explaning the effectiveness of PPPs},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseVosseler2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Vosseler, Christian},
  title     = {Who governs partnershis? on the role board, donors, partners and other stakeholders},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LieseJeanetschekSarre2014,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit and Jeanetschek, Hannah and Sarre, Johanna},
  title     = {Can PPPs make it anywhere? how limited statehood and other area factors influence PPP effectiveness},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseJanetscheketal.2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Janetschek, Hannah and Sarre, Johanna},
  title     = {Transnational partnerships: conditions for successful service provision in areas of limited statehood},
  series = {Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0952-1895},
  doi       = {10.1111/gove.12070},
  pages     = {655 -- 673},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{daConceicaoHeldtKochLiese2014,
  author    = {da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia and Koch, Martin and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {International organizations autonomy, politicization, interorganizational relations and change foreword},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Hannover},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  pages     = {3 -- 3},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@unpublished{daConceicaoHeldtKochLiese2014,
  author    = {da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia and Koch, Martin and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {International organisations as research subject. Or: "About Blind and the Shape of the Elephant"},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Hannover},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  pages     = {4 -- 27},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{daConceicaoHeldtKochLiese2014,
  author    = {da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia and Koch, Martin and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {International organizations in a complex world- borders and Aadded value of a pluralistic research},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Hannover},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  pages     = {478 -- 493},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}