@article{PokornyKrmicekSudo2017,
  author    = {Pokorny, Richard and Krmicek, Lukas and Sudo, Masafumi},
  title     = {An endemic ichnoassemblage from a late Miocene paleolake in SE Iceland},
  series = {Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology : an international journal for the geo-sciences},
  volume    = {485},
  journal   = {Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology : an international journal for the geo-sciences},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0031-0182},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.07.033},
  pages     = {761 -- 773},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In Porisdalur valley, a small relict of a sedimentary body was identified in southeastern Iceland. It probably represents a remnant of the deep, tectonically arranged paleolake (Late Miocene, 8-9 Ma), and filled by volcaniclastic material from nearby, active volcanic centers. In the profile of tuffitic sandstone, siltstone and claystone, the ripple-bedding layers, molds and flute casts indicate periodic mass flow episodes. In the sedimentary profile, the characteristic arrangement of sediments is evident, showing features of the Bouma sequences. In the claystone layers, deposited during episodes of lowest kinetic energy, a specific ichnoassemblage was found, represented by Thorichnus ramosus igen. et isp. nov., T. corniculatus igen. et isp. nov., Mammillichnis jakubi isp. nov., Helminthoidichnites multilaqueatus comb. nov., Vamaspor jachymi igen. et isp. nov. and five preliminarily identified trace fossils. The assemblage belongs to Mermia ichnofacies, the nonmarine representative of an ichnofacies, developed in a turbiditic environment; most of identified trace fossils are so far endemic. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrmičekTimmermanZiemannetal.2020,
  author    = {Krm{\´i}ček, Luk{\´a}š and Timmerman, Martin Jan and Ziemann, Martin Andreas and Sudo, Masafumi and Ulrych, Jaromir},
  title     = {40Ar/39Ar step-heating dating of phlogopite and kaersutite megacrysts from the Železn{\´a} hůrka (Eisenb{\"u}hl) Pleistocene scoria cone, Czech Republic},
  series = {Geologica Carpathica},
  volume    = {71},
  journal   = {Geologica Carpathica},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Veda},
  address   = {Bratislava},
  issn      = {1335-0552},
  doi       = {10.31577/GeolCarp.71.4.6},
  pages     = {382 -- 387},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {(40)A/Ar-39 step-heating of mica and amphibole megacrysts from hauyne-bearing olivine melilitite scoria/tephra from the Zelezna hurka yielded a 435 +/- 108 ka isotope correlation age for phlogopite and a more imprecise 1.55 Ma total gas age of the kaersutite megacryst. The amphibole megacrysts may constitute the first, and the younger phlogopite megacrysts the later phase of mafic, hydrous melilitic magma crystallization. It cannot be ruled out that the amphibole megacrysts are petrogenetically unrelated to tephra and phlogopite megacrysts and were derived from mantle xenoliths or disaggregated older, deep crustal pegmatites. This is in line both with the rarity of amphibole at Zelezna hurka and with the observed signs of magmatic resorption at the edges of amphibole crystals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TimmermanKrmicekKrmičkovaetal.2023,
  author    = {Timmerman, Martin Jan and Krmicek, Lukas and Krm{\´i}čkov{\´a}, Simona and Slama, Jiri and Sudo, Masafumi and Sobel, Edward},
  title     = {Tonian-Ediacaran evolution of the Brunovistulian microcontinent (Czech Republic) deciphered from LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon and 40Ar/39Ar muscovite ages},
  series = {Precambrian research},
  volume    = {387},
  journal   = {Precambrian research},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0301-9268},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.precamres.2023.106981},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Granitoids of the Slavkov Domain of the Brunovistulian microcontinent (BVM) in the Czech Republic have Ediacaran U-Pb zircon crystallization ages with the dominant magmatic activity occurring between ca. 597 and 595 Ma. The ages overlap published ages for the adjacent Thaya Domain, showing that both domains formed coevally in the same subduction setting. The data support published models in which the Slavkov Domain formed as arc crust. The main stage of magmatism stopped after ca. 595-590 Ma and was quickly followed by cooling accompanied by intrusion of small volumes of rhyolite dykes at ca. 594 Ma. Slavkov Domain metasedimentary rocks are dominated by Cryogenian-Ediacaran detrital zircon populations and their protoliths were locally derived erosional products of Cryogenian to Ediacaran arc rocks of the Thaya and Slavkov domains. Metasedi-mentary rocks from the NE part of the BVM contain younger, ca. 550 Ma zircons indicating that the BVM grew northeastward by accretion of progressively younger material derived from magmatic rocks with latest Ediacaran crystallization ages. In contrast to the Thaya and Slavkov domains, the Metavolcanic Zone that lies between them formed between ca. 740 and 725 Ma in the late Tonian to early Cryogenian. It predates the main stage magmatic activity in the BVM by 135 to 150 Ma and is probably a relic of older crust that formed during rifting of the Rodinia supercontinent. At ca. 552-551 Ma in the latest Ediacaran, parts of the BVM were exposed at the surface, during which time red, terrestrial siliciclastic sediments (Basal Clastics) were deposited. These largely had (very) proximal sources such as the main stage granitoids of the Thaya and Slavkov domains. Clasts of (meta)sandstones contain much older zircon populations and provide evidence that Neoarchaean and Palaeo-, meso- and early Neoproterozoic crustal rocks were exposed in erosional position nearby.},
  language  = {en}
}