@misc{BoschWilbert2020,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Contrast and Assimilation Effects on Self-Evaluation of Performance and Task Interest in a Sample of Elementary School Children},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {600},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44481},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-444819},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social comparison processes and the social position within a school class already play a major role in performance evaluation as early as in elementary school. The influence of contrast and assimilation effects on self-evaluation of performance as well as task interest has been widely researched in observational studies under the labels big-fish-little-pond and basking-in-reflected-glory effect. This study examined the influence of similar contrast and assimilation effects in an experimental paradigm. Fifth and sixth grade students (n = 230) completed a computer-based learning task during which they received social comparative feedback based on 2 × 2 experimentally manipulated feedback conditions: social position (high vs. low) and peer performance (high vs. low). Results show a more positive development of task interest and self-evaluation of performance in both the high social position and the high peer performance condition. When applied to the school setting, results of this study suggest that students who already perform well in comparison to their peer group are also the ones who profit most from social comparative feedback, given that they are the ones who usually receive the corresponding positive performance feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RomingerFinkWeissetal.2017,
  author    = {Rominger, Christian and Fink, Andreas and Weiss, Elisabeth M. and Bosch, Jannis and Papousek, Ilona},
  title     = {Allusive thinking (remote associations) and auditory top-down inhibition skills differentially predict creativity and positive schizotypy},
  series = {Cognitive neuropsychiatry},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Cognitive neuropsychiatry},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1354-6805},
  doi       = {10.1080/13546805.2016.1278361},
  pages     = {108 -- 121},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Positive schizotypy and creativity seem to be linked. However, the question still remains why they are related, and what may make the difference? As creative ideation is hypothesised as a dual process (association and inhibition), the propensity for remote associations might be a shared mechanism. However, positive schizotypy and creative thinking might be differentially linked to inhibition. Therefore, this study investigated a potentially overlapping feature of positive schizotypy and creativity (remote associations) as well as a potential dissociative factor (auditory inhibition). Methods: From a large screening sample, 46 participants covering a broad range of positive schizotypy were selected. Association proneness was assessed via two association tasks, auditory inhibition skill with the forced-left condition of the Dichotic Listening Test, and creative thinking by means of two creative ideation tests. Results: Positive schizotypy and creative thinking were positively associated. Both traits were linked to lower rates of common associations. However, creative thinking was associated with higher and positive schizotypy with lower inhibitory control in the auditory domain. Conclusions: While creativity and positive schizotypy shared some variance (related to remote associations), profound inhibition skills may be vital for creative performance and may coincide with lower levels of positive schizotypy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SotardiBoschBrogt2020,
  author    = {Sotardi, Valerie A. and Bosch, Jannis and Brogt, Erik},
  title     = {Multidimensional influences of anxiety and assessment type on task performance},
  series = {Social psychology of education : an international journal},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Social psychology of education : an international journal},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1381-2890},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11218-019-09508-3},
  pages     = {499 -- 522},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {We examined state evaluation anxiety, trait evaluation anxiety, and neuroticism in relation to New Zealand first-year university students' (n = 234) task performance on either a test or essay assessment. For both assessment types, the underlying components of state evaluation anxiety (cognitive worry, emotionality, and distraction) reflect linear-as opposed to nonlinear-associations with task performance. Results of several regression models show differential effects of both state evaluation anxiety and neuroticism on task performance depending on the assessment type. The multi-dimensionality of anxiety and its relative contribution on task performance across authentic types of assessment are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BoschWilbert2023,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {The impact of social comparison processes on self-evaluation of performance, self-concept, and task interest},
  number    = {836},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58875},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-588751},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Development of self-concept and task interest has been shown to be affected by social comparison processes in a variety of cross-sectional studies. A potential explanation for these effects is an effect of social comparative performance feedback on an individual's self-evaluation of performance, which in turn influences development of self-concept and task interest. There are, however, only few studies addressing this topic with experimental designs. This study was aimed at closing this research gap by experimentally manipulating social comparative performance. Feedback given was based on 2 × 2 experimental conditions: social position (high vs. low) and average performance of the reference group (high vs. low). Results show a strong effect of social position on self-evaluation of performance and smaller effects on self-concept and task interest.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoschWilbert2023,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {The impact of social comparison processes on self-evaluation of performance, self-concept, and task interest},
  series = {Frontiers in education},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in education},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2023.1033488},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Development of self-concept and task interest has been shown to be affected by social comparison processes in a variety of cross-sectional studies. A potential explanation for these effects is an effect of social comparative performance feedback on an individual's self-evaluation of performance, which in turn influences development of self-concept and task interest. There are, however, only few studies addressing this topic with experimental designs. This study was aimed at closing this research gap by experimentally manipulating social comparative performance. Feedback given was based on 2 × 2 experimental conditions: social position (high vs. low) and average performance of the reference group (high vs. low). Results show a strong effect of social position on self-evaluation of performance and smaller effects on self-concept and task interest.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoschWilbert2020,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Contrast and Assimilation Effects on Self-Evaluation of Performance and Task Interest in a Sample of Elementary School Children},
  series = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Education},
  number    = {165},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2019.00165},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social comparison processes and the social position within a school class already play a major role in performance evaluation as early as in elementary school. The influence of contrast and assimilation effects on self-evaluation of performance as well as task interest has been widely researched in observational studies under the labels big-fish-little-pond and basking-in-reflected-glory effect. This study examined the influence of similar contrast and assimilation effects in an experimental paradigm. Fifth and sixth grade students (n = 230) completed a computer-based learning task during which they received social comparative feedback based on 2 × 2 experimentally manipulated feedback conditions: social position (high vs. low) and peer performance (high vs. low). Results show a more positive development of task interest and self-evaluation of performance in both the high social position and the high peer performance condition. When applied to the school setting, results of this study suggest that students who already perform well in comparison to their peer group are also the ones who profit most from social comparative feedback, given that they are the ones who usually receive the corresponding positive performance feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Bosch2020,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis},
  title     = {Differential consequences of social comparison processes for high and low achieving students},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {136},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BaerBoschWilbert2023,
  author    = {Baer, Ella and Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Diagnostik internalisierender Probleme im Schulkontext - das Erleben von Kindern in emotional herausfordernden Schulsituationen},
  series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  journal   = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-61668},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-616688},
  pages     = {131 -- 141},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Kinder mit internalisierenden Problemen erleben t{\"a}glich herausfordernde akademische sowie soziale Situationen im Schulkontext. Dabei ist entscheidend, dass Lehrkr{\"a}fte in der Lage sind diese Kinder zu identifizieren, um p{\"a}dagogisch ad{\"a}quat handeln zu k{\"o}nnen. Aufgrund der nach innen gerichteten Symptome stellt das Erkennen internalisierender Probleme eine große Herausforderung dar. Zur Diagnostik werden vorwiegend standardisierte Frageb{\"o}gen eingesetzt, welche den Schulkontext sowie spezifische Altersgruppen und die damit einhergehende Ver{\"a}nderlichkeit von Emotionswahrnehmungen der betroffenen Kinder nur unzureichend ber{\"u}cksichtigen. Dieser Beitrag pr{\"a}sentiert die Ergebnisse einer Interviewstudie und diskutiert den Einsatz von Interviews als Methode zur Identifikation emotional relevanter Situationen aus der Perspektive von Kindern. Die Ergebnisse sollen der Ableitung alters- und kontextspezifischer Items dienen, um die Diagnostik internalisierender Schwierigkeiten weiterzuentwickeln.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HermannsBoehmeMeyeringetal.2023,
  author    = {Hermanns, Jolanda and B{\"o}hme, Katrin and Meyering, Meike and Fuchs, Isabelle and Wagner, Simon and Krauskopf, Karsten and Knigge, Michel and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Wulff, Peter and Mientus, Lukas and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas and Baer, Ella and Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Br{\"a}sel, Tim and Fenn, Monika and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Kuzle, Ana and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Burg, Paula and Lampart, Fabian and Leubner, Martin and Freitag-Hild, Britta and Bitmann, Anna and Reinhardt, Susanne and Roos, Jana and Hußner, Isabell and B{\"o}rner, Dustin and Lazarides, Rebecca and Glowinski, Ingrid and Autenrieth, Marijke and Radke, Thea and Ehlert, Antje and Menke, Anne and Haupenthal, Anna and Schramm, Satyam Antonio and Kruse, Julia and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Fischer, Jakob Thomas and Kayser, Daniela Niesta},
  title     = {PSI-Potsdam},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {3},
  editor    = {Hermanns, Jolanda},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60187},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601875},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {393},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wird seit 2015 im Rahmen der „Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" das Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) durchgef{\"u}hrt und am Zentrum f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) koordiniert. Zur ersten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2015-2018) erschien der Band „PSI-Potsdam - Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2015-2018)" zum Auftakt der Reihe „Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung". Der vorliegende Band aus der gleichen Reihe gibt in den Kapiteln „Erhebungen", „Lehrkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber alle Teilprojekte der zweiten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2019-2023). Wissenschaftler:innen aus verschiedenen Fachdidaktiken, Fachwissenschaften sowie aus den Bildungswissenschaften und der Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik haben im Rahmen des Projektes kooperiert. Sowohl praxisnahe Forschung als auch die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte sowie Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung stehen im Fokus dieses Bandes. Die Praxisphasen, die im Rahmen des „Potsdamer Modells der Lehrerbildung" eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wurden in einer großen Studie {\"u}ber alle Praxisphasen untersucht. Der Band gibt interessante Einblicke in die Ergebnisse der Teilprojekte und Anregungen sowohl f{\"u}r die eigene Forschung als auch f{\"u}r Entwicklungsarbeit wie zum Beispiel die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte. Herausgegeben wird dieser Band von PD Dr. Jolanda Hermanns (Gesamtkoordinatorin PSI-Potsdam und Chemiedidaktikerin).},
  language  = {de}
}