@misc{KuehlingvanKempenGebhardtetal.2010, author = {K{\"u}hling, Matthias and van Kempen, Britta and Gebhardt, Thomas and Hustedt, Thurid and Ruberg, Bj{\"o}rn and Schenke, Ulrike and Peter, Andreas and G{\"o}rlich, Petra and Horn-Conrad, Antje and Reinhardt, Ragna and Walch, Claudia}, title = {Portal = Was macht das Schaf an der Uni? Lange Nacht der Wissenschaften}, number = {02/2010}, organization = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Referat f{\"u}r Presse- und {\"O}ffentlichkeitsarbeit}, issn = {1618-6893}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44020}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-440209}, pages = {43}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Aus dem Inhalt: - Was macht das Schaf an der Uni? Lange Nacht der Wissenschaften 2010! - Frauen am Dirigentenpult - Diplomaten auf Probe}, language = {de} } @article{NeyerFelberGebhardt2012, author = {Neyer, Franz J. and Felber, Juliane and Gebhardt, Claudia}, title = {Development and validation of a brief measure of technology commitment}, series = {Diagnostica}, volume = {58}, journal = {Diagnostica}, number = {2}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {0012-1924}, doi = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000067}, pages = {87 -- 99}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The authors propose a model of technology commitment that describes individual differences in the willingness of technology use in terms of three facets: technology acceptance, technology competence, technology control. It is assumed that technology commitment predicts adaptive technology use especially in old age. Data from three studies (N = 825 participants) support the conceptual distinction of the constructs and confirm the psychometric properties of the newly constructed scale. Construct validity was established via correlations with theoretically related constructs (technology use, personality, successful aging, health) as well as concurrently vis-a-vis other measures of technology acceptance.}, language = {de} }