@article{WeidlichZiekowGaletal.2014,
  author    = {Weidlich, Matthias and Ziekow, Holger and Gal, Avigdor and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias},
  title     = {Optimizing event pattern matching using business process models},
  series = {IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers},
  address   = {Los Alamitos},
  issn      = {1041-4347},
  doi       = {10.1109/TKDE.2014.2302306},
  pages     = {2759 -- 2773},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {A growing number of enterprises use complex event processing for monitoring and controlling their operations, while business process models are used to document working procedures. In this work, we propose a comprehensive method for complex event processing optimization using business process models. Our proposed method is based on the extraction of behaviorial constraints that are used, in turn, to rewrite patterns for event detection, and select and transform execution plans. We offer a set of rewriting rules that is shown to be complete with respect to the all, seq, and any patterns. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated in an experimental evaluation with a large number of processes from an insurance company. We illustrate that the proposed optimization leads to significant savings in query processing. By integrating the optimization in state-of-the-art systems for event pattern matching, we demonstrate that these savings materialize in different technical infrastructures and can be combined with existing optimization techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MendlingWebervanderAalstetal.2018,
  author    = {Mendling, Jan and Weber, Ingo and van der Aalst, Wil and Brocke, Jan Vom and Cabanillas, Cristina and Daniel, Florian and Debois, Soren and Di Ciccio, Claudio and Dumas, Marlon and Dustdar, Schahram and Gal, Avigdor and Garcia-Banuelos, Luciano and Governatori, Guido and Hull, Richard and La Rosa, Marcello and Leopold, Henrik and Leymann, Frank and Recker, Jan and Reichert, Manfred and Reijers, Hajo A. and Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie and Solti, Andreas and Rosemann, Michael and Schulte, Stefan and Singh, Munindar P. and Slaats, Tijs and Staples, Mark and Weber, Barbara and Weidlich, Matthias and Weske, Mathias and Xu, Xiwei and Zhu, Liming},
  title     = {Blockchains for Business Process Management},
  series = {ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {2158-656X},
  doi       = {10.1145/3183367},
  pages     = {1 -- 16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Blockchain technology offers a sizable promise to rethink the way interorganizational business processes are managed because of its potential to realize execution without a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). To stimulate research on this promise and the limits thereof, in this article, we outline the challenges and opportunities of blockchain for business process management (BPM). We first reflect how blockchains could be used in the context of the established BPM lifecycle and second how they might become relevant beyond. We conclude our discourse with a summary of seven research directions for investigating the application of blockchain technology in the context of BPM.},
  language  = {en}
}