@misc{WestendorfBaeErlenkamperetal.2010,
  author    = {Westendorf, Christian and Bae, Albert J. and Erlenkamper, Christoph and Galland, Edouard and Franck, Carl and Bodenschatz, Eberhard and Beta, Carsten},
  title     = {Live cell flattening},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {835},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42831},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-428311},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Eukaryotic cell flattening is valuable for improving microscopic observations, ranging from bright field (BF) to total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Fundamental processes, such as mitosis and in vivo actin polymerization, have been investigated using these techniques. Here, we review the well known agar overlayer protocol and the oil overlay method. In addition, we present more elaborate microfluidics-based techniques that provide us with a greater level of control. We demonstrate these techniques on the social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each method.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MiegelGraeffSelleetal.2016,
  author    = {Miegel, Konrad and Graeff, Thomas and Selle, Benny and Salzmann, Thomas and Franck, Christian and Bronstert, Axel},
  title     = {Investigation of a renatured fen on the Baltic Sea coast of Mecklenburg - Part I: System description and basic hydrological characterisation},
  series = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  volume    = {60},
  journal   = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  publisher = {Bundesanst. f{\~A}¼r Gew{\~A}\isserkunde},
  address   = {Koblenz},
  issn      = {1439-1783},
  doi       = {10.5675/HyWa_2016.4_1},
  pages     = {242 -- 258},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MiegelGraeffFrancketal.2017,
  author    = {Miegel, Konrad and Gr{\"a}ff, Thomas and Franck, Christian and Salzmann, Thomas and Bronstert, Axel and Walther, Marc and Oswald, Sascha},
  title     = {Auswirkungen des Sturmhochwassers der Ostsee am 4./5. Januar 2017 auf das renaturierte Nieder- moor „H{\"u}telmoor und Heiligensee" an der deut- schen Ostseek{\"u}ste},
  series = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Bundesanst. f{\"u}r Gew{\"a}sserkunde},
  address   = {Koblenz},
  issn      = {1439-1783},
  doi       = {10.5675/HyWa_2017,4_2},
  pages     = {232 -- 243},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Entlang der K{\"u}stenniederung des Naturschutzgebietes „H{\"u}telmoor und Heiligensee", ca. 6 km nord{\"o}stlich von Rostock-Warnem{\"u}nde gelegen, wird seit dem Jahr 2000 die K{\"u}stend{\"u}ne nicht mehr instand gehalten. Im Rahmen der Renaturierung des Gebietes werden so grunds{\"a}tzlich wieder {\"U}berflutungen bei Ostseehochwassern zugelassen, was bisher jedoch noch nicht eingetreten ist. Am 4./5. Januar 2017 ereignete sich ein Sturmhochwasser der Ostsee, mit einem Scheitelwasserstand in Warnem{\"u}nde, der sich zwischen dem 10- und 20-j{\"a}hrlichen Hochwasserstand einordnet. Dennoch kam es bei diesem Ereignis nicht zum D{\"u}nendurchbruch und zur seeseitigen {\"U}berflutung, wohl aber zum binnenseitigen Einstrom von Salz- bzw. Brackwasser. Dieser erfolgte {\"u}ber den Graben, durch den das Gebiet normalerweise {\"u}ber die Warnow in die Ostsee entw{\"a}ssert. Durch das Einstr{\"o}men {\"u}ber die Sohlschwelle, sonst Auslass des Gebietes, stiegen die Wasserst{\"a}nde und Salzkonzentrationen in der s{\"u}dwestlichen H{\"a}lfte der Niederung an. Mit zunehmender Entfernung zur Sohlschwelle waren diese Auswirkungen jedoch geringer sp{\"u}rbar. Dies gilt wegen der Retentionswirkung der Niederung mehr f{\"u}r den Wasserstand als f{\"u}r die Salzkonzentration. W{\"a}hrend der Wasserstand durch den Einstau der Niederung und {\"U}berschwemmungen fl{\"a}chenhaft anstieg, breitete sich die Salzfront pr{\"a}ferentiell in den ehemaligen Entw{\"a}sserungsgr{\"a}ben, die trotz des Einstaus nach wie vor hydraulisch aktiv sind, eher linienhaft aus. Diese Interpretation beruht auf Messergebnissen von Wasserstand, elektrischer Leitf{\"a}higkeit und Wassertemperatur.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{AllanWeisserFischeretal.2013,
  author    = {Allan, Eric and Weisser, Wolfgang W. and Fischer, Markus and Schulze, Ernst-Detlef and Weigelt, Alexandra and Roscher, Christiane and Baade, Jussi and Barnard, Romain L. and Bessler, Holger and Buchmann, Nina and Ebeling, Anne and Eisenhauer, Nico and Engels, Christof and Fergus, Alexander J. F. and Gleixner, Gerd and Gubsch, Marlen and Halle, Stefan and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Kertscher, Ilona and Kuu, Annely and Lange, Markus and Le Roux, Xavier and Meyer, Sebastian T. and Migunova, Varvara D. and Milcu, Alexandru and Niklaus, Pascal A. and Oelmann, Yvonne and Pasalic, Esther and Petermann, Jana S. and Poly, Franck and Rottstock, Tanja and Sabais, Alexander C. W. and Scherber, Christoph and Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael and Scheu, Stefan and Steinbeiss, Sibylle and Schwichtenberg, Guido and Temperton, Vicky and Tscharntke, Teja and Voigt, Winfried and Wilcke, Wolfgang and Wirth, Christian and Schmid, Bernhard},
  title     = {A comparison of the strength of biodiversity effects across multiple functions},
  series = {Oecologia},
  volume    = {173},
  journal   = {Oecologia},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0029-8549},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00442-012-2589-0},
  pages     = {223 -- 237},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {In order to predict which ecosystem functions are most at risk from biodiversity loss, meta-analyses have generalised results from biodiversity experiments over different sites and ecosystem types. In contrast, comparing the strength of biodiversity effects across a large number of ecosystem processes measured in a single experiment permits more direct comparisons. Here, we present an analysis of 418 separate measures of 38 ecosystem processes. Overall, 45 \% of processes were significantly affected by plant species richness, suggesting that, while diversity affects a large number of processes not all respond to biodiversity. We therefore compared the strength of plant diversity effects between different categories of ecosystem processes, grouping processes according to the year of measurement, their biogeochemical cycle, trophic level and compartment (above- or belowground) and according to whether they were measures of biodiversity or other ecosystem processes, biotic or abiotic and static or dynamic. Overall, and for several individual processes, we found that biodiversity effects became stronger over time. Measures of the carbon cycle were also affected more strongly by plant species richness than were the measures associated with the nitrogen cycle. Further, we found greater plant species richness effects on measures of biodiversity than on other processes. The differential effects of plant diversity on the various types of ecosystem processes indicate that future research and political effort should shift from a general debate about whether biodiversity loss impairs ecosystem functions to focussing on the specific functions of interest and ways to preserve them individually or in combination.},
  language  = {en}
}