@article{HeinzeWeckHahnetal.2022,
  author    = {Heinze, Peter Eric and Weck, Florian and Hahn, Daniela and K{\"u}hne, Franziska},
  title     = {Differences in psychotherapy preferences between psychotherapy trainees and laypeople},
  series = {Psychotherapy research : the official journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Psychotherapy research : the official journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1050-3307},
  doi       = {10.1080/10503307.2022.2098076},
  pages     = {374 -- 386},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Objective: Despite increasing research on psychotherapy preferences, the preferences of psychotherapy trainees are largely unknown. Moreover, differences in preferences between trainees and their patients could (a) hinder symptom improvement and therapy success for patients and (b) represent significant obstacles in the early career and development of future therapists. Method: We compared the preferences of n = 466 psychotherapy trainees to those of n = 969 laypersons using the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences. Moreover, we compared preferences between trainees in cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic trainees. Results: We found significant differences between both samples in 13 of 18 items, and three of four subscales. Psychotherapy trainees preferred less therapist directiveness (d = 0.58), more emotional intensity (d = 0.74), as well as more focused challenge (d = 0.35) than laypeople. CBT trainees preferred more therapist directiveness (d = 2.00), less emotional intensity (d = 0.51), more present orientation (d = 0.76) and more focused challenge (d = 0.33) than trainees in psychodynamic/psychoanalytic therapy. Conclusion: Overall, the results underline the importance of implementing preference assessment and discussion during psychotherapy training. Moreover, therapists of different orientations seem to cover a large range of preferences for patients, in order to choose the right fit.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HahnWeckWitthoeftetal.2021,
  author    = {Hahn, Daniela and Weck, Florian and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael and K{\"u}hne, Franziska},
  title     = {Assessment of counseling self-efficacy},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Many authors regard counseling self-efficacy (CSE) as important in therapist development and training. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised (CASES-R). Method: The sample consisted of 670 German psychotherapy trainees, who completed an online survey. We examined the factor structure by applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to the instrument as a whole. Results: A bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling model with one general and five specific factors provided the best fit to the data. Omega hierarchical coefficients indicated optimal reliability for the general factor, acceptable reliability for the Action Skills-Revised (AS-R) factor, and insufficient estimates for the remaining factors. The CASES-R scales yielded significant correlations with related measures, but also with therapeutic orientations. Conclusion: We found support for the reliability and validity of the German CASES-R. However, the subdomains (except AS-R) should be interpreted with caution, and we do not recommend the CASES-R for comparisons between psychotherapeutic orientations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HahnWeckWitthoeftetal.2022,
  author    = {Hahn, Daniela and Weck, Florian and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael and Maiwald, Lisa Marie and Foral, Annika and K{\"u}hne, Franziska},
  title     = {Wie erleben Psychotherapeut_innen in Ausbildung ihre Selbsterfahrung?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1616-3443},
  doi       = {10.1026/1616-3443/a000626},
  pages     = {78 -- 89},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Self-experiential work is a central component of psychotherapy training. However, research on this matter has not received a lot of attention. Objective: This study explores the conditions and effects of helpful self-experiential work. Method: We interviewed 14 psychotherapists in training using a semistructured interview guide and applied qualitative content analysis according to Mayring (2015). Results: Different characteristics were associated with helpful self-experiential work: characteristics of the instructor (e. g., implementation skills), organization, willingness of the trainees to learn, topics and methods applied, and a sustainable working atmosphere. Among the positive effects reported was the promotion of the trainees' interpersonal competencies. Furthermore, we found some side effects and negative impact (e. g.. exhaustion). Conclusions: We were able to extract conditions that can guide the execution of helpful self-experiential work and the effects of self-experiential work from the perspective of the trainees.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{AbdallaAbramowskiAharonianetal.2016,
  author    = {Abdalla, Hassan E. and Abramowski, Attila and Aharonian, Felix A. and Benkhali, Fai{\c{c}}al Ait and Akhperjanian, A. G. and Ang{\"u}ner, Ekrem Oǧuzhan and Arrieta, M. and Aubert, Pierre and Backes, Michael and Balzer, Arnim and Barnard, Michelle and Becherini, Yvonne and Tjus, Julia Becker and Berge, David and Bernhard, Sabrina and Bernl{\"o}hr, K. and Birsin, E. and Blackwell, R. and Bottcher, Markus and Boisson, Catherine and Bolmont, J. and Bordas, Pol and Bregeon, Johan and Brun, Francois and Brun, Pierre and Bryan, Mark and Bulik, Tomasz and Capasso, M. and Carr, John and Casanova, Sabrina and Chakraborty, N. and Chalme-Calvet, R. and Chaves, Ryan C. G. and Chen, Andrew and Chevalier, J. and Chretien, M. and Colafrancesco, Sergio and Cologna, Gabriele and Condon, B. and Conrad, Jan and Couturier, C. and Cui, Y. and Davids, I. D. and Degrange, B. and Deil, Christoph and deWilt, P. and Djannati-Atai, Arache and Domainko, Wilfried and Donath, Axel and Dubus, Guillaume and Dutson, Kate and Dyks, J. and Dyrda, M. and Edwards, T. and Egberts, Kathrin and Eger, P. and Ernenwein, J. -P. and Eschbach, S. and Farnier, C. and Fegan, Stuart and Fernandes, M. V. and Fiasson, A. and Fontaine, G. and Foerster, A. and Funk, S. and F{\"u}ßling, Matthias and Gabici, Stefano and Gajdus, M. and Gallant, Y. A. and Garrigoux, T. and Giavitto, Gianluca and Giebels, B. and Glicenstein, J. F. and Gottschall, Daniel and Goyal, A. and Grondin, M. -H. and Grudzinska, M. and Hadasch, Daniela and Hahn, J. and Hawkes, J. and Heinzelmann, G. and Henri, Gilles and Hermann, G. and Hervet, Olivier and Hillert, A. and Hinton, James Anthony and Hofmann, Werner and Hoischen, Clemens and Holler, M. and Horns, D. and Ivascenko, Alex and Jacholkowska, A. and Jamrozy, Marek and Janiak, M. and Jankowsky, D. and Jankowsky, Felix and Jingo, M. and Jogler, Tobias and Jouvin, Lea and Jung-Richardt, Ira and Kastendieck, M. A. and Katarzynski, Krzysztof and Katz, Uli and Kerszberg, D. and Khelifi, B. and Kieffer, M. and King, J. and Klepser, S. and Klochkov, Dmitry and Kluzniak, W. and Kolitzus, D. and Komin, Nu. and Kosack, K. and Krakau, S. and Kraus, Michael and Krayzel, F. and Kruger, P. P. and Laffon, H. and Lamanna, G. and Lau, Jeanie and Lees, J. -P. and Lefaucheur, J. and Lefranc, V. and Lemiere, A. and Lemoine-Goumard, M. and Lenain, J. -P. and Leser, Eva and Lohse, Thomas and Lorentz, M. and Lui, R. and Lypova, Iryna and Marandon, Vincent and Marcowith, Alexandre and Mariaud, C. and Marx, R. and Maurin, G. and Maxted, N. and Mayer, Michael and Meintjes, Petrus Johannes and Menzler, U. and Meyer, Manuel and Mitchell, A. M. W. and Moderski, R. and Mohamed, M. and Mora, K. and Moulin, Emmanuel and Murach, T. and de Naurois, Mathieu and Niederwanger, F. and Niemiec, J. and Oakes, L. and Odaka, Hirokazu and Ohm, Stefan and Oettl, S. and Ostrowski, M. and Oya, I. and Padovani, Marco and Panter, M. and Parsons, R. D. and Arribas, M. Paz and Pekeur, N. W. and Pelletier, G. and Petrucci, P. -O. and Peyaud, B. and Pita, S. and Poon, Helen and Prokhorov, Dmitry and Prokoph, Heike and Puehlhofer, Gerd and Punch, Michael and Quirrenbach, Andreas and Raab, S. and Reimer, Anita and Reimer, Olaf and Renaud, M. and de los Reyes, R. and Rieger, Frank and Romoli, Carlo and Rosier-Lees, S. and Rowell, G. and Rudak, B. and Rulten, C. B. and Sahakian, V. and Salek, David and Sanchez, David A. and Santangelo, Andrea and Sasaki, Manami and Schlickeiser, Reinhard and Schussler, F. and Schulz, Andreas and Schwanke, U. and Schwemmer, S. and Seyffert, A. S. and Shafi, N. and Simoni, R. and Sol, H. and Spanier, Felix and Spengler, G. and Spiess, F. and Stawarz, Lukasz and Steenkamp, R. and Stegmann, Christian and Stinzing, F. and Stycz, K. and Sushch, Iurii and Tavernet, J. -P. and Tavernier, T. and Taylor, A. M. and Terrier, R. and Tluczykont, Martin and Trichard, C. and Tuffs, R. and van der Walt, Johan and van Eldik, Christopher and van Soelen, Brian and Vasileiadis, Georges and Veh, J. and Venter, C. and Viana, A. and Vincent, P. and Vink, Jacco and Voisin, F. and Voelk, Heinrich J. and Vuillaume, Thomas and Wadiasingh, Z. and Wagner, Stefan J. and Wagner, P. and Wagner, R. M. and White, R. and Wierzcholska, Alicja and Willmann, P. and Woernlein, A. and Wouters, Denis and Yang, R. and Zabalza, Victor and Zaborov, D. and Zacharias, M. and Zdziarski, A. A. and Zech, Andreas and Zefi, F. and Ziegler, A. and Zywucka, Natalia},
  title     = {Search for Dark Matter Annihilations towards the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with HESS},
  series = {Physical review letters},
  volume    = {117},
  journal   = {Physical review letters},
  publisher = {American Physical Society},
  address   = {College Park},
  organization    = {HESS Collaboration},
  issn      = {0031-9007},
  doi       = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.111301},
  pages     = {6},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The inner region of the Milky Way halo harbors a large amount of dark matter (DM). Given its proximity, it is one of the most promising targets to look for DM. We report on a search for the annihilations of DM particles using gamma-ray observations towards the inner 300 pc of the Milky Way, with the H.E.S.S. array of ground-based Cherenkov telescopes. The analysis is based on a 2D maximum likelihood method using Galactic Center (GC) data accumulated by H.E.S.S. over the last 10 years (2004-2014), and does not show any significant gamma-ray signal above background. Assuming Einasto and Navarro-Frenk-White DM density profiles at the GC, we derive upper limits on the annihilation cross section <sigma nu >. These constraints are the strongest obtained so far in the TeV DM mass range and improve upon previous limits by a factor 5. For the Einasto profile, the constraints reach <sigma nu > values of 6 x 10(-26) cm(3) s(-1) in the W+W- channel for a DM particle mass of 1.5 TeV, and 2 x 10(-26) cm(3) s(-1) in the tau(+)tau(-) channel for a 1 TeV mass. For the first time, ground-based gamma-ray observations have reached sufficient sensitivity to probe <sigma nu > values expected from the thermal relic density for TeV DM particles.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{AbramowskiAharonianBenkhalietal.2015,
  author    = {Abramowski, Attila and Aharonian, Felix A. and Benkhali, Faical Ait and Akhperjanian, A. G. and Ang{\"u}ner, Ekrem Oǧuzhan and Backes, Michael and Balenderan, Shangkari and Balzer, Arnim and Barnacka, Anna and Becherini, Yvonne and Tjus, Julia Becker and Berge, David and Bernhard, Sabrina and Bernl{\"o}hr, Konrad and Birsin, E. and Biteau, Jonathan and B{\"o}ttcher, Markus and Boisson, Catherine and Bolmont, J. and Bordas, Pol and Bregeon, Johan and Brun, Francois and Brun, Pierre and Bryan, Mark and Bulik, Tomasz and Carrigan, Svenja and Casanova, Sabrina and Chadwick, Paula M. and Chakraborty, Nachiketa and Chalme-Calvet, R. and Chaves, Ryan C. G. and Chretien, M. and Colafrancesco, Sergio and Cologna, Gabriele and Conrad, Jan and Couturier, Claire and Cui, Yudong and Davids, Isak Delberth and Degrange, Bernhard and Deil, Christoph and deWilt, P. and Djannati-Ata{\"i}, A. and Domainko, Wilfried and Donath, Axel and Dubus, G. and Dutson, K. and Dyks, J. and Dyrda, M. and Edwards, Tanya and Egberts, Kathrin and Eger, Peter and Espigat, P. and Farnier, C. and Fegan, Stephen and Feinstein, Fabrice and Fernandes, Milton Virgilio and Fernandez, Diane and Fiasson, A. and Fontaine, Gerard and F{\"o}rster, Andreas and Fuessling, M. and Gabici, S. and Gajdus, M. and Gallant, Yves A. and Garrigoux, Tania and Giavitto, G. and Giebels, Berrie and Glicenstein, Jean-Francois and Gottschall, Daniel and Grondin, M. -H. and Grudzinska, M. and Hadasch, Daniela and Haeffner, S. and Hahn, Joachim and Harris, Jonathan and Heinzelmann, G{\"o}tz and Henri, G. and Hermann, German and Hervet, O. and Hillert, Andreas and Hinton, James Anthony and Hofmann, Werner and Hofverberg, Petter and Holler, Markus and Horns, Dieter and Ivascenko, Alex and Jacholkowska, A. and Jahn, C. and Jamrozy, Marek and Janiak, M. and Jankowsky, F. and Jung-Richardt, I. and Kastendieck, Max Anton and Katarzynski, K. and Katz, U. and Kaufmann, S. and Khelifi, B. and Kieffer, Michel and Klepser, S. and Klochkov, Dmitry and Kluzniak, W. and Kolitzus, David and Komin, Nu and Kosack, Karl and Krakau, Steffen and Krayzel, F. and Krueger, Pat P. and Laffon, H. and Lamanna, G. and Lefaucheur, J. and Lefranc, Valentin and Lemiere, A. and Lemoine-Goumard, M. and Lenain, J. -P. and Lohse, Thomas and Lopatin, A. and Lu, Chia-Chun and Marandon, Vincent and Marcowith, Alexandre and Marx, Ramin and Maurin, G. and Maxted, Nigel and Mayer, Michael and McComb, T. J. Lowry and Mehault, J. and Meintjes, P. J. and Menzler, Ulf and Meyer, M. and Mitchell, Alison M. W. and Moderski, R. and Mohamed, M. and Mora, K. and Moulin, Emmanuel and Murach, Thomas and de Naurois, Mathieu and Niemiec, J. and Nolan, Sam J. and Oakes, Louise and Odaka, Hirokazu and Ohm, S. and Optiz, Bj{\"o}rn and Ostrowski, Michal and Oya, I. and Panter, Michael and Parsons, R. Daniel and Arribas, M. Paz and Pekeur, Nikki W. and Pelletier, G. and Petrucci, P. -O. and Peyaud, B. and Pita, S. and Poon, Helen and P{\"u}hlhofer, Gerd and Punch, M. and Quirrenbach, A. and Raab, S. and Reichardt, I. and Reimer, Anita and Reimer, Olaf and Renaud, Metz and de los Reyes, Raquel and Rieger, Frank and Romoli, C. and Rosier-Lees, S. and Rowell, G. and Rudak, B. and Rulten, C. B. and Sahakian, Vardan and Salek, D. and Sanchez, David M. and Santangelo, Andrea and Schlickeiser, Reinhard and Schuessler, F. and Schulz, A. and Schwanke, Ullrich and Schwarzburg, S. and Schwemmer, S. and Sol, H. and Spanier, Felix and Spengler, G. and Spies, Franziska and Stawarz, Lukasz and Steenkamp, Riaan and Stegmann, Christian and Stinzing, F. and Stycz, K. and Sushch, Iurii and Tavernet, J. -P. and Tavernier, T. and Taylor, A. M. and Terrier, R. and Tluczykont, Martin and Trichard, C. and Valerius, K. and van Eldik, C. and van Soelen, B. and Vasileiadis, Georges and Veh, J. and Venter, Christo and Viana, Aion and Vincent, P. and Vink, Jacco and V{\"o}lk, Heinrich J. and Volpe, Francesca and Vorster, Martine and Vuillaume, T. and Wagner, S. J. and Wagner, P. and Wagner, R. M. and Ward, Martin and Weidinger, Matthias and Weitzel, Quirin and White, R. and Wierzcholska, A. and Willmann, P. and Woernlein, A. and Wouters, D. and Yang, Ruizhi and Zabalza, Victor and Zaborov, Dmitry and Zacharias, M. and Zdziarski, A. A. and Zech, Alraune and Zechlin, Hannes -S.},
  title     = {H.E.S.S. detection of TeV emission from the interaction region between the supernova remnant G349.7+0.2 and a molecular cloud (vol 574, A100, 2015)},
  series = {Astronomy and astrophysics : an international weekly journal},
  volume    = {580},
  journal   = {Astronomy and astrophysics : an international weekly journal},
  publisher = {EDP Sciences},
  address   = {Les Ulis},
  organization    = {HESS Collaboration},
  issn      = {1432-0746},
  doi       = {10.1051/0004-6361/201425070e},
  pages     = {2},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeckJungaKliegletal.2021,
  author    = {Weck, Florian and Junga, Yvonne Marie and Kliegl, Reinhold and Hahn, Daniela and Brucker, Katharina and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael},
  title     = {Effects of competence feedback on therapist competence and patient outcome},
  series = {Journal of consulting and clinical psychology},
  volume    = {89},
  journal   = {Journal of consulting and clinical psychology},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0022-006X},
  doi       = {10.1037/ccp0000686},
  pages     = {885 -- 897},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective: Therapist competence is considered essential for the success of psychotherapy. Feedback is an intervention which has the potential to improve therapist competence. The present study investigated whether competence feedback leads to an improvement of therapist competence and patient outcome. Method: Sixty-seven master-level clinical trainees were randomly assigned to either a competence feedback group (CFG) or a control group (CG). Patients with a diagnosis of major depression (N = 114) were randomly assigned to CFG or CG. Treatment included 20 individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In CFG, therapists received, parallel to the treatment, five competence feedbacks, based on videotaped therapy sessions. Independent raters assessed therapist competence with the Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS) and provided the competence feedback. Patient outcome was evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and therapeutic alliance (Helping Alliance Questionnaire [HAQ]) from both therapist's (HAQ-T) and patient's (HAQ-P) perspective were evaluated after each of the 20 sessions. Results: (a) Therapist competence (CTS) increased significantly more for CFG than CG. (b) Depression (BDI-II) decreased significantly across sessions for both groups, but without evidence for a group-differential benefit for the CFG. (c) Therapeutic alliance (HAQ-T/P) increased significantly across sessions for both groups from both perspectives, but without group differences. (d) There is a positive effect of BDI-II on CTS at the beginning and a negative effect of CTS on BDI-II at the end of therapy. Conclusion: Competence feedback improves therapists' independently rated competence, but there is no evidence that competence feedback in CBT leads to better outcome. What is the public health significance of this article? This study suggests the substantial value of systematic competence feedback for improving therapist competence in the psychotherapy of depression. No significant effect of competence feedback on the reduction of reported depressive symptoms was found.},
  language  = {en}
}