@article{KruckenbergMuellerFreulingetal.2011,
  author    = {Kruckenberg, Helmut and M{\"u}ller, Thomas and Freuling, Conrad and M{\"u}hle, Ralf-Udo and Globig, Anja and Schirrmeier, Horst and Buss, Melanie and Harder, Timm and Kramer, Matthias and Teske, Kathrin and Polderdijk, Kees and Wallschl{\"a}ger, Hans-Dieter and Hlinak, Andreas},
  title     = {Serological and virological survey and resighting of marked wild geese in Germany},
  series = {European journal of wildlife research},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {European journal of wildlife research},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1612-4642},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10344-011-0514-1},
  pages     = {1025 -- 1032},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {In order to investigate the potential role of arctic geese in the epidemiology, the spatial and temporal spread of selected avian diseases, in autumn 2002, a virological and serological survey designed as capture-mark-resighting study was conducted in one of the most important coastal resting sites for migratory waterfowl in Germany. Orophatyngeal, cloacal swabs and blood samples were collected from a total of 147 birds comprising of three different arctic geese species including White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons), Tundra Bean Goose (Anser fabalis rossicus), Pink-footed Goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) as well as from 29 non-migratory Canada Geese (Branta canadensis). Altogether, six adeno-like viruses (ALV; 95\% CI, 1.74-9.92\%) and two avian paramyxoviruses (APMV-4; 95\% Cl, 0.19-5.53\%) were isolated mainly from juvenile White-fronted Geese. In addition, four Canada Geese were infected with lentogenic APMV-1 (95\% CI, 3.89-31.66\%) at the date of sampling. No avian influenza viruses, reo-like viruses could be isolated despite serological evidence. Likewise, no evidence of current or previous infection by West Nile virus was found. Of the 147 birds tagged in the following years, 137 birds were resighted between 2002 and 2008 accumulating to 1925 sightings. About 90\% of all sightings were reported from the main wintering and resting sites in Germany and The Netherlands. Eight of the resighted geese were virus positive (ALV and APMV-4) at the time point of sampling in 2002.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchatzFreulingAueretal.2014,
  author    = {Schatz, Juliane and Freuling, Conrad Martin and Auer, Ernst and Goharriz, Hooman and Harbusch, Christine and Johnson, Nicholas and Kaipf, Ingrid and Mettenleiter, Thomas Christoph and Muehldorder, Kristin and Muehle, Ralf-Udo and Ohlendorf, Bernd and Pott-D{\"o}rfer, B{\"a}rbel and Prueger, Julia and Ali, Hanan Sheikh and Stiefel, Dagmar and Teubner, Jens and Ulrich, Rainer G{\"u}nter and Wibbelt, Gudrun and M{\"u}ller, Thomas},
  title     = {Enhanced passive bat rabies surveillance in indigenous bat species from Germany - A retrospective study},
  series = {PLoS neglected tropical diseases},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS neglected tropical diseases},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {PLoS},
  address   = {San Fransisco},
  issn      = {1935-2735},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pntd.0002835},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In Germany, rabies in bats is a notifiable zoonotic disease, which is caused by European bat lyssaviruses type 1 and 2 (EBLV-1 and 2), and the recently discovered new lyssavirus species Bokeloh bat lyssavirus (BBLV). As the understanding of bat rabies in insectivorous bat species is limited, in addition to routine bat rabies diagnosis, an enhanced passive surveillance study, i.e. the retrospective investigation of dead bats that had not been tested for rabies, was initiated in 1998 to study the distribution, abundance and epidemiology of lyssavirus infections in bats from Germany. A total number of 5478 individuals representing 21 bat species within two families were included in this study. The Noctule bat (Nyctalus noctula) and the Common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) represented the most specimens submitted. Of all investigated bats, 1.17\% tested positive for lyssaviruses using the fluorescent antibody test (FAT). The vast majority of positive cases was identified as EBLV-1, predominately associated with the Serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus). However, rabies cases in other species, i.e. Nathusius' pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus nathusii), P. pipistrellus and Brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus) were also characterized as EBLV-1. In contrast, EBLV-2 was isolated from three Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii). These three cases contribute significantly to the understanding of EBLV-2 infections in Germany as only one case had been reported prior to this study. This enhanced passive surveillance indicated that besides known reservoir species, further bat species are affected by lyssavirus infections. Given the increasing diversity of lyssaviruses and bats as reservoir host species worldwide, lyssavirus positive specimens, i.e. both bat and virus need to be confirmed by molecular techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{SchatzOhlendorfBusseetal.2013,
  author    = {Schatz, Juliane and Ohlendorf, Bernd and Busse, Peter and Pelz, Gerrit and Dolch, Dietrich and Teubner, Jens and Encarnacao, Jorge A. and M{\"u}hle, Ralf-Udo and Fischer, M. and Hoffmann, Bernd and Kwasnitschka, Linda and Balkema-Buschmann, Anne and Mettenleiter, Thomas Christoph and M{\"u}ller, T. and Freuling, Conrad M.},
  title     = {Twenty years of active bat rabies surveillance in Germany},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {533},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41514},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-415140},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {In Germany, active bat rabies surveillance was conducted between 1993 and 2012. A total of 4546 oropharyngeal swab samples from 18 bat species were screened for the presence of EBLV-1- , EBLV-2- and BBLV-specific RNA. Overall, 0 center dot 15\% of oropharyngeal swab samples tested EBLV-1 positive, with the majority originating from Eptesicus serotinus. Interestingly, out of seven RT-PCR-positive oropharyngeal swabs subjected to virus isolation, viable virus was isolated from a single serotine bat (E. serotinus). Additionally, about 1226 blood samples were tested serologically, and varying virus neutralizing antibody titres were found in at least eight different bat species. The detection of viral RNA and seroconversion in repeatedly sampled serotine bats indicates long-term circulation of the virus in a particular bat colony. The limitations of random-based active bat rabies surveillance over passive bat rabies surveillance and its possible application of targeted approaches for future research activities on bat lyssavirus dynamics and maintenance are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}