@article{KwiatekSaarnoAderetal.2019,
  author    = {Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Saarno, Tero and Ader, Thomas and Bl{\"u}mle, Felix and Bohnhoff, Marco and Chendorain, Michael and Dresen, Georg and Heikkinen, Pekka and Kukkonen, Ilmo and Leary, Peter and Leonhardt, Maria and Malin, Peter and Martinez-Garzon, Patricia and Passmore, Kevin and Passmore, Paul and Valenzuela, Sergio and Wollin, Christopher},
  title     = {Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland},
  series = {Science Advances},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Science Advances},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {2375-2548},
  doi       = {10.1126/sciadv.aav7224},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {We show that near-real-time seismic monitoring of fluid injection allowed control of induced earthquakes during the stimulation of a 6.1-km-deep geothermal well near Helsinki, Finland. A total of 18,160 m(3) of fresh water was pumped into crystalline rocks over 49 days in June to July 2018. Seismic monitoring was performed with a 24-station borehole seismometer network. Using near-real-time information on induced-earthquake rates, locations, magnitudes, and evolution of seismic and hydraulic energy, pumping was either stopped or varied-in the latter case, between well-head pressures of 60 and 90 MPa and flow rates of 400 and 800 liters/min. This procedure avoided the nucleation of a project-stopping magnitude M-W 2.0 induced earthquake, a limit set by local authorities. Our results suggest a possible physics-based approach to controlling stimulation-induced seismicity in geothermal projects.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DurandBentzKwiateketal.2020,
  author    = {Durand, Virginie and Bentz, Stephan and Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Dresen, Georg and Wollin, Christopher and Heidbach, Oliver and Martinez-Garzon, Patricia and Cotton, Fabrice and Nurlu, Murat and Bohnhoff, Marco},
  title     = {A two-scale preparation phase preceded an M-w 5.8 earthquake in the sea of marmara offshore Istanbul, Turkey},
  series = {Seismological research letters},
  volume    = {91},
  journal   = {Seismological research letters},
  number    = {6},
  address   = {Boulder},
  issn      = {0895-0695},
  doi       = {10.1785/0220200110},
  pages     = {3139 -- 3147},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {We analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of seismicity during a sequence of moderate (an M-w 4.7 foreshock and M-w 5.8 mainshock) earthquakes occurring in September 2019 at the transition between a creeping and a locked segment of the North Anatolian fault in the central Sea of Marmara, northwest Turkey. To investigate in detail the seismicity evolution, we apply a matched-filter technique to continuous waveforms, thus reducing the magnitude threshold for detection. Sequences of foreshocks preceding the two largest events are clearly seen, exhibiting two different behaviors: a long-term activation of the seismicity along the entire fault segment and a short-term concentration around the epicenters of the large events. We suggest a two-scale preparation phase, with aseismic slip preparing the mainshock final rupture a few days before, and a cascade mechanism leading to the nucleation of the mainshock. Thus, our study shows a combination of seismic and aseismic slip during the foreshock sequence changing the strength of the fault, bringing it closer to failure.},
  language  = {en}
}