@article{WesselSchumannWesseletal.2000, author = {Wessel, Niels and Schumann, Agnes and Wessel, Niels and Schumann, Agnes and Schirdewan, Alexander and Voss, Andreas and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Entropy measures in heart rate variability data}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HeinischRomeikeKnobelsdorfetal.2013, author = {Heinisch, Isabelle and Romeike, Ralf and Knobelsdorf, Maria and Kreitz, Christoph and Nyl{\´e}n, Aletta and D{\"o}rge, Christina and G{\"o}ttel, Timo and Holz, Jan and Bergner, Nadine and Schroeder, Ulrik and Metzger, Christiane and Haag, Johann and Abke, J{\"o}rg and Schwirtlich, Vincent and Sedelmaier, Yvonne and M{\"u}ller, Dorothee and Frommer, Andreas and Humbert, Ludger and Berges, Marc and M{\"u}hling, Andreas and Hubwieser, Peter and Steuer, Horst and Engbring, Dieter and Selke, Harald and Drews, Paul and Schirmer, Ingrid and Morisse, Marcel and Sagawe, Arno and Rolf, Arno and Friedemann, Stefan and Gr{\"o}ger, Stefan and Schumann, Matthias and Klinger, Melanie and Polutina, Olena and Bibel, Ariane and G{\"o}tz, Christian and Brinda, Torsten and Apel, Rebecca and Berg, Tobias and Bergner, Nadine and Chatti, Mohamed Amine and Leicht-Scholten, Carmen and Schroeder, Ulrik and Al-Saffar, Loay Talib and Petre, Marian and Schirmer, Ingrid and Rick, Detlef}, title = {HDI 2012 - Informatik f{\"u}r eine nachhaltige Zukunft : 5. Fachtagung Hochschuldidaktik der Informatik ; 06.-07. November 2012, Universit{\"a}t Hamburg}, editor = {Forbrig, Peter and Rick, Detlef and Schmolitzky, Axel}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-220-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62891}, pages = {169}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Die Tagungsreihe zur Hochschuldidaktik der Informatik HDI wird vom Fachbereich Informatik und Ausbildung / Didaktik der Informatik (IAD) in der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Informatik e. V. (GI) organisiert. Sie dient den Lehrenden der Informatik in Studieng{\"a}ngen an Hochschulen als Forum der Information und des Austauschs {\"u}ber neue didaktische Ans{\"a}tze und bildungspolitische Themen im Bereich der Hochschulausbildung aus der fachlichen Perspektive der Informatik. Diese f{\"u}nfte HDI 2012 wurde an der Universit{\"a}t Hamburg organisiert. F{\"u}r sie wurde das spezielle Motto „Informatik f{\"u}r eine nachhaltige Zukunft" gew{\"a}hlt, um insbesondere Fragen der Bildungsrelevanz informatischer Inhalte, der Kompetenzen f{\"u}r Studierende informatisch gepr{\"a}gter Studieng{\"a}nge und der Rolle der Informatik in der Hochschulentwicklung zu diskutieren.}, language = {de} } @book{AmendTrautBayerleDunckeretal.2018, author = {Amend-Traut, Anja and Bayerle, Katrin and Duncker, Arne Dirk and Dusil, Stephan and Forster, Wolfgang and Frassek, Ralf and Hermann, Hans-Georg and Koch, Elisabeth and Lettmaier, Saskia and L{\"o}hning, Martin and Ludyga, Hannes and Maetschke, Matthias and Mayenburg, David von and Meder, Stephan and Repgen, Tilman and Roth, Andreas and Saar, Stefan Christoph and Schlinker, Steffen and Schmoeckel, Matthias and Schumann, Eva and Thier, Andreas}, title = {Familienrecht \S\S 1297-1921}, series = {Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB ; 4}, journal = {Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB ; 4}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {978-3-16-156399-7}, pages = {XXXVIII,1622}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @book{RanaMohapatraSidorovaetal.2022, author = {Rana, Kaushik and Mohapatra, Durga Prasad and Sidorova, Julia and Lundberg, Lars and Sk{\"o}ld, Lars and Lopes Grim, Lu{\´i}s Fernando and Sampaio Gradvohl, Andr{\´e} Leon and Cremerius, Jonas and Siegert, Simon and Weltzien, Anton von and Baldi, Annika and Klessascheck, Finn and Kalancha, Svitlana and Lichtenstein, Tom and Shaabani, Nuhad and Meinel, Christoph and Friedrich, Tobias and Lenzner, Pascal and Schumann, David and Wiese, Ingmar and Sarna, Nicole and Wiese, Lena and Tashkandi, Araek Sami and van der Walt, Est{\´e}e and Eloff, Jan H. P. and Schmidt, Christopher and H{\"u}gle, Johannes and Horschig, Siegfried and Uflacker, Matthias and Najafi, Pejman and Sapegin, Andrey and Cheng, Feng and Stojanovic, Dragan and Stojnev Ilić, Aleksandra and Djordjevic, Igor and Stojanovic, Natalija and Predic, Bratislav and Gonz{\´a}lez-Jim{\´e}nez, Mario and de Lara, Juan and Mischkewitz, Sven and Kainz, Bernhard and van Hoorn, Andr{\´e} and Ferme, Vincenzo and Schulz, Henning and Knigge, Marlene and Hecht, Sonja and Prifti, Loina and Krcmar, Helmut and Fabian, Benjamin and Ermakova, Tatiana and Kelkel, Stefan and Baumann, Annika and Morgenstern, Laura and Plauth, Max and Eberhard, Felix and Wolff, Felix and Polze, Andreas and Cech, Tim and Danz, Noel and Noack, Nele Sina and Pirl, Lukas and Beilharz, Jossekin Jakob and De Oliveira, Roberto C. L. and Soares, F{\´a}bio Mendes and Juiz, Carlos and Bermejo, Belen and M{\"u}hle, Alexander and Gr{\"u}ner, Andreas and Saxena, Vageesh and Gayvoronskaya, Tatiana and Weyand, Christopher and Krause, Mirko and Frank, Markus and Bischoff, Sebastian and Behrens, Freya and R{\"u}ckin, Julius and Ziegler, Adrian and Vogel, Thomas and Tran, Chinh and Moser, Irene and Grunske, Lars and Sz{\´a}rnyas, G{\´a}bor and Marton, J{\´o}zsef and Maginecz, J{\´a}nos and Varr{\´o}, D{\´a}niel and Antal, J{\´a}nos Benjamin}, title = {HPI Future SOC Lab - Proceedings 2018}, number = {151}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Polze, Andreas and Beins, Karsten and Strotmann, Rolf and Seibold, Ulrich and R{\"o}dszus, Kurt and M{\"u}ller, J{\"u}rgen}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-547-7}, issn = {1613-5652}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-56371}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-563712}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {x, 277}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The "HPI Future SOC Lab" is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners. The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies. This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2018. Selected projects have presented their results on April 17th and November 14th 2017 at the Future SOC Lab Day events.}, language = {en} } @article{HolzBoeckerSchlierBuchmannetal.2017, author = {Holz, Nathalie E. and Boecker-Schlier, Regina and Buchmann, Arlette F. and Blomeyer, Dorothea and Jennen-Steinmetz, Christine and Baumeister, Sarah and Plichta, Michael M. and Cattrell, Anna and Schumann, Gunter and Esser, G{\"u}nter and Schmidt, Martin and Buitelaar, Jan and Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas and Banaschewski, Tobias and Brandeis, Daniel and Laucht, Manfred}, title = {Ventral striatum and amygdala activity as convergence sites for early adversity and conduct disorder}, series = {Frontiers in human neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in human neuroscience}, number = {2}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1749-5016}, doi = {10.1093/scan/nsw120}, pages = {261 -- 272}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Childhood family adversity (CFA) increases the risk for conduct disorder (CD) and has been associated with alterations in regions of affective processing like ventral striatum (VS) and amygdala. However, no study so far has demonstrated neural converging effects of CFA and CD in the same sample. At age 25 years, functional MRI data during two affective tasks, i.e. a reward (N = 171) and a face-matching paradigm (N = 181) and anatomical scans (N = 181) were acquired in right-handed currently healthy participants of an epidemiological study followed since birth. CFA during childhood was determined using a standardized parent interview. Disruptive behaviors and CD diagnoses during childhood and adolescence were obtained by diagnostic interview (2-19 years), temperamental reward dependence was assessed by questionnaire (15 and 19 years). CFA predicted increased CD and amygdala volume. Both exposure to CFA and CD were associated with a decreased VS response during reward anticipation and blunted amygdala activity during face-matching. CD mediated the effect of CFA on brain activity. Temperamental reward dependence was negatively correlated with CFA and CD and positively with VS activity. These findings underline the detrimental effects of CFA on the offspring's affective processing and support the importance of early postnatal intervention programs aiming to reduce childhood adversity factors.}, language = {en} } @article{MerzBassoFischeretal.2022, author = {Merz, Bruno and Basso, Stefano and Fischer, Svenja and Lun, David and Bloeschl, Guenter and Merz, Ralf and Guse, Bjorn and Viglione, Alberto and Vorogushyn, Sergiy and Macdonald, Elena and Wietzke, Luzie and Schumann, Andreas}, title = {Understanding heavy tails of flood peak distributions}, series = {Water resources research}, volume = {58}, journal = {Water resources research}, number = {6}, publisher = {American Geophysical Union}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0043-1397}, doi = {10.1029/2021WR030506}, pages = {37}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Statistical distributions of flood peak discharge often show heavy tail behavior, that is, extreme floods are more likely to occur than would be predicted by commonly used distributions that have exponential asymptotic behavior. This heavy tail behavior may surprise flood managers and citizens, as human intuition tends to expect light tail behavior, and the heaviness of the tails is very difficult to predict, which may lead to unnecessarily high flood damage. Despite its high importance, the literature on the heavy tail behavior of flood distributions is rather fragmented. In this review, we provide a coherent overview of the processes causing heavy flood tails and the implications for science and practice. Specifically, we propose nine hypotheses on the mechanisms causing heavy tails in flood peak distributions related to processes in the atmosphere, the catchment, and the river system. We then discuss to which extent the current knowledge supports or contradicts these hypotheses. We also discuss the statistical conditions for the emergence of heavy tail behavior based on derived distribution theory and relate them to the hypotheses and flood generation mechanisms. We review the degree to which the heaviness of the tails can be predicted from process knowledge and data. Finally, we recommend further research toward testing the hypotheses and improving the prediction of heavy tails.}, language = {en} } @misc{TarasovaMerzKissetal.2019, author = {Tarasova, Larisa and Merz, Ralf and Kiss, Andrea and Basso, Stefano and Bl{\"o}chl, G{\"u}nter and Merz, Bruno and Viglione, Alberto and Pl{\"o}tner, Stefan and Guse, Bj{\"o}rn and Schumann, Andreas and Fischer, Svenja and Ahrens, Bodo and Anwar, Faizan and B{\´a}rdossy, Andr{\´a}s and B{\"u}hler, Philipp and Haberlandt, Uwe and Kreibich, Heidi and Krug, Amelie and Lun, David and M{\"u}ller-Thomy, Hannes and Pidoto, Ross and Primo, Cristina and Seidel, Jochen and Vorogushyn, Sergiy and Wietzke, Luzie}, title = {Causative classification of river flood events}, series = {Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews : Water}, volume = {6}, journal = {Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews : Water}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {2049-1948}, doi = {10.1002/wat2.1353}, pages = {23}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A wide variety of processes controls the time of occurrence, duration, extent, and severity of river floods. Classifying flood events by their causative processes may assist in enhancing the accuracy of local and regional flood frequency estimates and support the detection and interpretation of any changes in flood occurrence and magnitudes. This paper provides a critical review of existing causative classifications of instrumental and preinstrumental series of flood events, discusses their validity and applications, and identifies opportunities for moving toward more comprehensive approaches. So far no unified definition of causative mechanisms of flood events exists. Existing frameworks for classification of instrumental and preinstrumental series of flood events adopt different perspectives: hydroclimatic (large-scale circulation patterns and atmospheric state at the time of the event), hydrological (catchment scale precipitation patterns and antecedent catchment state), and hydrograph-based (indirectly considering generating mechanisms through their effects on hydrograph characteristics). All of these approaches intend to capture the flood generating mechanisms and are useful for characterizing the flood processes at various spatial and temporal scales. However, uncertainty analyses with respect to indicators, classification methods, and data to assess the robustness of the classification are rarely performed which limits the transferability across different geographic regions. It is argued that more rigorous testing is needed. There are opportunities for extending classification methods to include indicators of space-time dynamics of rainfall, antecedent wetness, and routing effects, which will make the classification schemes even more useful for understanding and estimating floods. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Extremes Science of Water > Hydrological Processes Science of Water > Methods}, language = {en} } @misc{XieJiaRollsetal.2021, author = {Xie, Chao and Jia, Tianye and Rolls, Edmund T. and Robbins, Trevor W. and Sahakian, Barbara J. and Zhang, Jie and Liu, Zhaowen and Cheng, Wei and Luo, Qiang and Zac Lo, Chun-Yi and Schumann, Gunter and Feng, Jianfeng and Wang, He and Banaschewski, Tobias and Barker, Gareth J. and Bokde, Arun L.W. and B{\"u}chel, Christian and Quinlan, Erin Burke and Desrivi{\`e}res, Sylvane and Flor, Herta and Grigis, Antoine and Garavan, Hugh and Gowland, Penny and Heinz, Andreas and Hohmann, Sarah and Ittermann, Bernd and Martinot, Jean-Luc and Paill{\`e}re Martinot, Marie-Laure and Nees, Frauke and Papadopoulos Orfanos, Dimitri and Paus, Tom{\´a}š and Poustka, Luise and Fr{\"o}hner, Juliane H. and Smolka, Michael N. and Walter, Henrik and Whelan, Robert}, title = {Reward versus nonreward sensitivity of the medial versus lateral orbitofrontal cortex relates to the severity of depressive symptoms}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {3}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-55788}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-557882}, pages = {13}, year = {2021}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in depression. The hypothesis investigated was whether the OFC sensitivity to reward and nonreward is related to the severity of depressive symptoms. METHODS: Activations in the monetary incentive delay task were measured in the IMAGEN cohort at ages 14 years (n = 1877) and 19 years (n = 1140) with a longitudinal design. Clinically relevant subgroups were compared at ages 19 (high-severity group: n = 116; low-severity group: n = 206) and 14. RESULTS: The medial OFC exhibited graded activation increases to reward, and the lateral OFC had graded activation increases to nonreward. In this general population, the medial and lateral OFC activations were associated with concurrent depressive symptoms at both ages 14 and 19 years. In a stratified high-severity depressive symptom group versus control group comparison, the lateral OFC showed greater sensitivity for the magnitudes of activations related to nonreward in the high-severity group at age 19 (p = .027), and the medial OFC showed decreased sensitivity to the reward magnitudes in the high-severity group at both ages 14 (p = .002) and 19 (p = .002). In a longitudinal design, there was greater sensitivity to nonreward of the lateral OFC at age 14 for those who exhibited high depressive symptom severity later at age 19 (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Activations in the lateral OFC relate to sensitivity to not winning, were associated with high depressive symptom scores, and at age 14 predicted the depressive symptoms at ages 16 and 19. Activations in the medial OFC were related to sensitivity to winning, and reduced reward sensitivity was associated with concurrent high depressive symptom scores.}, language = {en} } @misc{KaminskiSchlagenhaufRappetal.2018, author = {Kaminski, Jakob A. and Schlagenhauf, Florian and Rapp, Michael A. and Awasthi, Swapnil and Ruggeri, Barbara and Deserno, Lorenz and Banaschewski, Tobias and Bokde, Arun L. W. and Bromberg, Uli and B{\"u}chel, Christian and Quinlan, Erin Burke and Desrivi{\`e}res, Sylvane and Flor, Herta and Frouin, Vincent and Garavan, Hugh and Gowland, Penny and Ittermann, Bernd and Martinot, Jean-Luc and Paill{\`e}re Martinot, Marie-Laure and Nees, Frauke and Papadopoulos Orfanos, Dimitri and Paus, Tom{\´a}š and Poustka, Luise and Smolka, Michael N. and Fr{\"o}hner, Juliane H. and Walter, Henrik and Whelan, Robert and Ripke, Stephan and Schumann, Gunter and Heinz, Andreas}, title = {Epigenetic variance in dopamine D2 receptor}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {950}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42568}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-425687}, pages = {13}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Genetic and environmental factors both contribute to cognitive test performance. A substantial increase in average intelligence test results in the second half of the previous century within one generation is unlikely to be explained by genetic changes. One possible explanation for the strong malleability of cognitive performance measure is that environmental factors modify gene expression via epigenetic mechanisms. Epigenetic factors may help to understand the recent observations of an association between dopamine-dependent encoding of reward prediction errors and cognitive capacity, which was modulated by adverse life events. The possible manifestation of malleable biomarkers contributing to variance in cognitive test performance, and thus possibly contributing to the "missing heritability" between estimates from twin studies and variance explained by genetic markers, is still unclear. Here we show in 1475 healthy adolescents from the IMaging and GENetics (IMAGEN) sample that general IQ (gIQ) is associated with (1) polygenic scores for intelligence, (2) epigenetic modification of DRD2 gene, (3) gray matter density in striatum, and (4) functional striatal activation elicited by temporarily surprising reward-predicting cues. Comparing the relative importance for the prediction of gIQ in an overlapping subsample, our results demonstrate neurobiological correlates of the malleability of gIQ and point to equal importance of genetic variance, epigenetic modification of DRD2 receptor gene, as well as functional striatal activation, known to influence dopamine neurotransmission. Peripheral epigenetic markers are in need of confirmation in the central nervous system and should be tested in longitudinal settings specifically assessing individual and environmental factors that modify epigenetic structure.}, language = {en} } @article{KaminskiSchlagenhaufRappetal.2018, author = {Kaminski, Jakob A. and Schlagenhauf, Florian and Rapp, Michael A. and Awasthi, Swapnil and Ruggeri, Barbara and Deserno, Lorenz and Banaschewski, Tobias and Bokde, Arun L. W. and Bromberg, Uli and B{\"u}chel, Christian and Quinlan, Erin Burke and Desrivieres, Sylvane and Flor, Herta and Frouin, Vincent and Garavan, Hugh and Gowland, Penny and Ittermann, Bernd and Martinot, Jean-Luc and Martinot, Marie-Laure Paillere and Nees, Frauke and Orfanos, Dimitri Papadopoulos and Paus, Tomas and Poustka, Luise and Smolka, Michael N. and Fr{\"o}hner, Juliane H. and Walter, Henrik and Whelan, Robert and Ripke, Stephan and Schumann, Gunter and Heinz, Andreas}, title = {Epigenetic variance in dopamine D2 receptor}, series = {Translational Psychiatry}, volume = {8}, journal = {Translational Psychiatry}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {New York}, organization = {IMAGEN Consortium}, issn = {2158-3188}, doi = {10.1038/s41398-018-0222-7}, pages = {11}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Genetic and environmental factors both contribute to cognitive test performance. A substantial increase in average intelligence test results in the second half of the previous century within one generation is unlikely to be explained by genetic changes. One possible explanation for the strong malleability of cognitive performance measure is that environmental factors modify gene expression via epigenetic mechanisms. Epigenetic factors may help to understand the recent observations of an association between dopamine-dependent encoding of reward prediction errors and cognitive capacity, which was modulated by adverse life events. The possible manifestation of malleable biomarkers contributing to variance in cognitive test performance, and thus possibly contributing to the "missing heritability" between estimates from twin studies and variance explained by genetic markers, is still unclear. Here we show in 1475 healthy adolescents from the IMaging and GENetics (IMAGEN) sample that general IQ (gIQ) is associated with (1) polygenic scores for intelligence, (2) epigenetic modification of DRD2 gene, (3) gray matter density in striatum, and (4) functional striatal activation elicited by temporarily surprising reward-predicting cues. Comparing the relative importance for the prediction of gIQ in an overlapping subsample, our results demonstrate neurobiological correlates of the malleability of gIQ and point to equal importance of genetic variance, epigenetic modification of DRD2 receptor gene, as well as functional striatal activation, known to influence dopamine neurotransmission. Peripheral epigenetic markers are in need of confirmation in the central nervous system and should be tested in longitudinal settings specifically assessing individual and environmental factors that modify epigenetic structure.}, language = {en} }