@article{LehnStefanPeterMachannetal.2022, author = {Lehn-Stefan, Angela and Peter, Andreas and Machann, J{\"u}rgen and Schick, Fritz and Randrianarisoa, Elko and Heni, Martin and Wagner, Robert and Birkenfeld, Andreas L. and Fritsche, Andreas and Schulze, Matthias Bernd and Stefan, Norbert and Kantartzis, Konstantinos}, title = {Impaired metabolic health and low cardiorespiratory fitness independently associate with subclinical atherosclerosis in obesity}, series = {The journal of clinical endocrinology \& metabolism}, volume = {107}, journal = {The journal of clinical endocrinology \& metabolism}, number = {6}, publisher = {Endocrine Society}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0021-972X}, doi = {10.1210/clinem/dgac091}, pages = {E2417 -- E2424}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Context For a given body mass index (BMI), both impaired metabolic health (MH) and reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) associate with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objective It remains unknown whether both risk phenotypes relate to CVD independently of each other, and whether these relationships differ in normal weight, overweight, and obese subjects. Methods Data from 421 participants from the Tubingen Diabetes Family Study, who had measurements of anthropometrics, metabolic parameters, CRF (maximal aerobic capacity [VO2max]) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), an early marker of atherosclerosis, were analyzed. Subjects were divided by BMI and MH status into 6 phenotypes. Results In univariate analyses, older age, increased BMI, and a metabolic risk profile correlated positively, while insulin sensitivity and VO2max negatively with cIMT. In multivariable analyses in obese subjects, older age, male sex, lower VO2max (std. ss -0.21, P = 0.002) and impaired MH (std. ss 0.13, P = 0.02) were independent determinants of increased cIMT. After adjustment for age and sex, subjects with metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) had higher cIMT than subjects with metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW; 0.59 +/- 0.009 vs 0.52 +/- 0.01 mm; P < 0.05). When VO2max was additionally included in this model, the difference in cIMT between MHO and MHNW groups became statistically nonsignificant (0.58 +/- 0.009 vs 0.56 +/- 0.02 mm; P > 0.05). Conclusion These data suggest that impaired MH and low CRF independently determine increased cIMT in obese subjects and that low CRF may explain part of the increased CVD risk observed in MHO compared with MHNW.}, language = {en} } @article{AllanBossdorfDormannetal.2014, author = {Allan, Eric and Bossdorf, Oliver and Dormann, Carsten F. and Prati, Daniel and Gossner, Martin M. and Tscharntke, Teja and Bl{\"u}thgen, Nico and Bellach, Michaela and Birkhofer, Klaus and Boch, Steffen and B{\"o}hm, Stefan and B{\"o}rschig, Carmen and Chatzinotas, Antonis and Christ, Sabina and Daniel, Rolf and Diek{\"o}tter, Tim and Fischer, Christiane and Friedl, Thomas and Glaser, Karin and Hallmann, Christine and Hodac, Ladislav and H{\"o}lzel, Norbert and Jung, Kirsten and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Klaus, Valentin H. and Kleinebecker, Till and Krauss, Jochen and Lange, Markus and Morris, E. Kathryn and M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg and Nacke, Heiko and Pasalic, Esther and Rillig, Matthias C. and Rothenwoehrer, Christoph and Schally, Peter and Scherber, Christoph and Schulze, Waltraud X. and Socher, Stephanie A. and Steckel, Juliane and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and T{\"u}rke, Manfred and Weiner, Christiane N. and Werner, Michael and Westphal, Catrin and Wolters, Volkmar and Wubet, Tesfaye and Gockel, Sonja and Gorke, Martin and Hemp, Andreas and Renner, Swen C. and Sch{\"o}ning, Ingo and Pfeiffer, Simone and K{\"o}nig-Ries, Birgitta and Buscot, Francois and Linsenmair, Karl Eduard and Schulze, Ernst-Detlef and Weisser, Wolfgang W. and Fischer, Markus}, title = {Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity}, series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {111}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, number = {1}, publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0027-8424}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1312213111}, pages = {308 -- 313}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Although temporal heterogeneity is a well-accepted driver of biodiversity, effects of interannual variation in land-use intensity (LUI) have not been addressed yet. Additionally, responses to land use can differ greatly among different organisms; therefore, overall effects of land-use on total local biodiversity are hardly known. To test for effects of LUI (quantified as the combined intensity of fertilization, grazing, and mowing) and interannual variation in LUI (SD in LUI across time), we introduce a unique measure of whole-ecosystem biodiversity, multidiversity. This synthesizes individual diversity measures across up to 49 taxonomic groups of plants, animals, fungi, and bacteria from 150 grasslands. Multidiversity declined with increasing LUI among grasslands, particularly for rarer species and aboveground organisms, whereas common species and belowground groups were less sensitive. However, a high level of interannual variation in LUI increased overall multidiversity at low LUI and was even more beneficial for rarer species because it slowed the rate at which the multidiversity of rare species declined with increasing LUI. In more intensively managed grasslands, the diversity of rarer species was, on average, 18\% of the maximum diversity across all grasslands when LUI was static over time but increased to 31\% of the maximum when LUI changed maximally over time. In addition to decreasing overall LUI, we suggest varying LUI across years as a complementary strategy to promote biodiversity conservation.}, language = {en} } @misc{deVeraAlawiBackhausetal.2019, author = {de Vera, Jean-Pierre Paul and Alawi, Mashal and Backhaus, Theresa and Baque, Mickael and Billi, Daniela and Boettger, Ute and Berger, Thomas and Bohmeier, Maria and Cockell, Charles and Demets, Rene and de la Torre Noetzel, Rosa and Edwards, Howell and Elsaesser, Andreas and Fagliarone, Claudia and Fiedler, Annelie and Foing, Bernard and Foucher, Frederic and Fritz, J{\"o}rg and Hanke, Franziska and Herzog, Thomas and Horneck, Gerda and H{\"u}bers, Heinz-Wilhelm and Huwe, Bj{\"o}rn and Joshi, Jasmin Radha and Kozyrovska, Natalia and Kruchten, Martha and Lasch, Peter and Lee, Natuschka and Leuko, Stefan and Leya, Thomas and Lorek, Andreas and Martinez-Frias, Jesus and Meessen, Joachim and Moritz, Sophie and Moeller, Ralf and Olsson-Francis, Karen and Onofri, Silvano and Ott, Sieglinde and Pacelli, Claudia and Podolich, Olga and Rabbow, Elke and Reitz, G{\"u}nther and Rettberg, Petra and Reva, Oleg and Rothschild, Lynn and Garcia Sancho, Leo and Schulze-Makuch, Dirk and Selbmann, Laura and Serrano, Paloma and Szewzyk, Ulrich and Verseux, Cyprien and Wadsworth, Jennifer and Wagner, Dirk and Westall, Frances and Wolter, David and Zucconi, Laura}, title = {Limits of life and the habitability of Mars}, series = {Astrobiology}, volume = {19}, journal = {Astrobiology}, number = {2}, publisher = {Liebert}, address = {New Rochelle}, issn = {1531-1074}, doi = {10.1089/ast.2018.1897}, pages = {145 -- 157}, year = {2019}, abstract = {BIOMEX (BIOlogy and Mars EXperiment) is an ESA/Roscosmos space exposure experiment housed within the exposure facility EXPOSE-R2 outside the Zvezda module on the International Space Station (ISS). The design of the multiuser facility supports-among others-the BIOMEX investigations into the stability and level of degradation of space-exposed biosignatures such as pigments, secondary metabolites, and cell surfaces in contact with a terrestrial and Mars analog mineral environment. In parallel, analysis on the viability of the investigated organisms has provided relevant data for evaluation of the habitability of Mars, for the limits of life, and for the likelihood of an interplanetary transfer of life (theory of lithopanspermia). In this project, lichens, archaea, bacteria, cyanobacteria, snow/permafrost algae, meristematic black fungi, and bryophytes from alpine and polar habitats were embedded, grown, and cultured on a mixture of martian and lunar regolith analogs or other terrestrial minerals. The organisms and regolith analogs and terrestrial mineral mixtures were then exposed to space and to simulated Mars-like conditions by way of the EXPOSE-R2 facility. In this special issue, we present the first set of data obtained in reference to our investigation into the habitability of Mars and limits of life. This project was initiated and implemented by the BIOMEX group, an international and interdisciplinary consortium of 30 institutes in 12 countries on 3 continents. Preflight tests for sample selection, results from ground-based simulation experiments, and the space experiments themselves are presented and include a complete overview of the scientific processes required for this space experiment and postflight analysis. The presented BIOMEX concept could be scaled up to future exposure experiments on the Moon and will serve as a pretest in low Earth orbit.}, language = {en} } @article{FoerstnerBoettgerMoldavskietal.2023, author = {F{\"o}rstner, Bernd Rainer and B{\"o}ttger, Sarah Jane and Moldavski, Alexander and Bajbouj, Malek and Pfennig, Andrea and Manook, Andre and Ising, Marcus and Pittig, Andre and Heinig, Ingmar and Heinz, Andreas and Mathiak, Klaus and Schulze, Thomas G. and Schneider, Frank and Kamp-Becker, Inge and Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas and Padberg, Frank and Banaschewski, Tobias and Bauer, Michael and Rupprecht, Rainer and Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich and Rapp, Michael A. and Tschorn, Mira}, title = {The associations of positive and negative valence systems, cognitive systems and social processes on disease severity in anxiety and depressive disorders}, series = {Frontiers in psychiatry}, volume = {14}, journal = {Frontiers in psychiatry}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-0640}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1161097}, pages = {10}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Background Anxiety and depressive disorders share common features of mood dysfunctions. This has stimulated interest in transdiagnostic dimensional research as proposed by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) aiming to improve the understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the processing of RDoC domains in relation to disease severity in order to identify latent disorder-specific as well as transdiagnostic indicators of disease severity in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders. Methods Within the German research network for mental disorders, 895 participants (n = 476 female, n = 602 anxiety disorder, n = 257 depressive disorder) were recruited for the Phenotypic, Diagnostic and Clinical Domain Assessment Network Germany (PD-CAN) and included in this cross-sectional study. We performed incremental regression models to investigate the association of four RDoC domains on disease severity in patients with affective disorders: Positive (PVS) and Negative Valance System (NVS), Cognitive Systems (CS) and Social Processes (SP). Results The results confirmed a transdiagnostic relationship for all four domains, as we found significant main effects on disease severity within domain-specific models (PVS: \& beta; = -0.35; NVS: \& beta; = 0.39; CS: \& beta; = -0.12; SP: \& beta; = -0.32). We also found three significant interaction effects with main diagnosis showing a disease-specific association. Limitations The cross-sectional study design prevents causal conclusions. Further limitations include possible outliers and heteroskedasticity in all regression models which we appropriately controlled for. Conclusion Our key results show that symptom burden in anxiety and depressive disorders is associated with latent RDoC indicators in transdiagnostic and disease-specific ways.}, language = {en} } @article{FoerstnerTschornReinosoSchilleretal.2022, author = {F{\"o}rstner, Bernd R. and Tschorn, Mira and Reinoso-Schiller, Nicolas and Maričić, Lea Mascarell and R{\"o}cher, Erik and Kalman, Janos L. and Stroth, Sanna and Mayer, Annalina V. and Schwarz, Kristina and Kaiser, Anna and Pfennig, Andrea and Manook, Andr{\´e} and Ising, Marcus and Heinig, Ingmar and Pittig, Andre and Heinz, Andreas and Mathiak, Klaus and Schulze, Thomas G. and Schneider, Frank and Kamp-Becker, Inge and Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas and Padberg, Frank and Banaschewski, Tobias and Bauer, Michael and Rupprecht, Rainer and Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich and Rapp, Michael A.}, title = {Mapping research domain criteria using a transdiagnostic mini-RDoC assessment in mental disorders: a confirmatory factor analysis}, series = {European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience}, volume = {273}, journal = {European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {0940-1334}, doi = {10.1007/s00406-022-01440-6}, pages = {527 -- 539}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This study aimed to build on the relationship of well-established self-report and behavioral assessments to the latent constructs positive (PVS) and negative valence systems (NVS), cognitive systems (CS), and social processes (SP) of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework in a large transnosological population which cuts across DSM/ICD-10 disorder criteria categories. One thousand four hundred and thirty one participants (42.1\% suffering from anxiety/fear-related, 18.2\% from depressive, 7.9\% from schizophrenia spectrum, 7.5\% from bipolar, 3.4\% from autism spectrum, 2.2\% from other disorders, 18.4\% healthy controls, and 0.2\% with no diagnosis specified) recruited in studies within the German research network for mental disorders for the Phenotypic, Diagnostic and Clinical Domain Assessment Network Germany (PD-CAN) were examined with a Mini-RDoC-Assessment including behavioral and self-report measures. The respective data was analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to delineate the underlying latent RDoC-structure. A revised four-factor model reflecting the core domains positive and negative valence systems as well as cognitive systems and social processes showed a good fit across this sample and showed significantly better fit compared to a one factor solution. The connections between the domains PVS, NVS and SP could be substantiated, indicating a universal latent structure spanning across known nosological entities. This study is the first to give an impression on the latent structure and intercorrelations between four core Research Domain Criteria in a transnosological sample. We emphasize the possibility of using already existing and well validated self-report and behavioral measurements to capture aspects of the latent structure informed by the RDoC matrix.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Schulze2011, author = {Schulze, Andreas}, title = {Demographics of supermassive black holes}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-54464}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Supermassive black holes are a fundamental component of the universe in general and of galaxies in particular. Almost every massive galaxy harbours a supermassive black hole (SMBH) in its center. Furthermore, there is a close connection between the growth of the SMBH and the evolution of its host galaxy, manifested in the relationship between the mass of the black hole and various properties of the galaxy's spheroid component, like its stellar velocity dispersion, luminosity or mass. Understanding this relationship and the growth of SMBHs is essential for our picture of galaxy formation and evolution. In this thesis, I make several contributions to improve our knowledge on the census of SMBHs and on the coevolution of black holes and galaxies. The first route I follow on this road is to obtain a complete census of the black hole population and its properties. Here, I focus particularly on active black holes, observable as Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) or quasars. These are found in large surveys of the sky. In this thesis, I use one of these surveys, the Hamburg/ESO survey (HES), to study the AGN population in the local volume (z~0). The demographics of AGN are traditionally represented by the AGN luminosity function, the distribution function of AGN at a given luminosity. I determined the local (z<0.3) optical luminosity function of so-called type 1 AGN, based on the broad band B_J magnitudes and AGN broad Halpha emission line luminosities, free of contamination from the host galaxy. I combined this result with fainter data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and constructed the best current optical AGN luminosity function at z~0. The comparison of the luminosity function with higher redshifts supports the current notion of 'AGN downsizing', i.e. the space density of the most luminous AGN peaks at higher redshifts and the space density of less luminous AGN peaks at lower redshifts. However, the AGN luminosity function does not reveal the full picture of active black hole demographics. This requires knowledge of the physical quantities, foremost the black hole mass and the accretion rate of the black hole, and the respective distribution functions, the active black hole mass function and the Eddington ratio distribution function. I developed a method for an unbiased estimate of these two distribution functions, employing a maximum likelihood technique and fully account for the selection function. I used this method to determine the active black hole mass function and the Eddington ratio distribution function for the local universe from the HES. I found a wide intrinsic distribution of black hole accretion rates and black hole masses. The comparison of the local active black hole mass function with the local total black hole mass function reveals evidence for 'AGN downsizing', in the sense that in the local universe the most massive black holes are in a less active stage then lower mass black holes. The second route I follow is a study of redshift evolution in the black hole-galaxy relations. While theoretical models can in general explain the existence of these relations, their redshift evolution puts strong constraints on these models. Observational studies on the black hole-galaxy relations naturally suffer from selection effects. These can potentially bias the conclusions inferred from the observations, if they are not taken into account. I investigated the issue of selection effects on type 1 AGN samples in detail and discuss various sources of bias, e.g. an AGN luminosity bias, an active fraction bias and an AGN evolution bias. If the selection function of the observational sample and the underlying distribution functions are known, it is possible to correct for this bias. I present a fitting method to obtain an unbiased estimate of the intrinsic black hole-galaxy relations from samples that are affected by selection effects. Third, I try to improve our census of dormant black holes and the determination of their masses. One of the most important techniques to determine the black hole mass in quiescent galaxies is via stellar dynamical modeling. This method employs photometric and kinematic observations of the galaxy and infers the gravitational potential from the stellar orbits. This method can reveal the presence of the black hole and give its mass, if the sphere of the black hole's gravitational influence is spatially resolved. However, usually the presence of a dark matter halo is ignored in the dynamical modeling, potentially causing a bias on the determined black hole mass. I ran dynamical models for a sample of 12 galaxies, including a dark matter halo. For galaxies for which the black hole's sphere of influence is not well resolved, I found that the black hole mass is systematically underestimated when the dark matter halo is ignored, while there is almost no effect for galaxies with well resolved sphere of influence.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Schulze2006, author = {Schulze, Andreas}, title = {Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9599}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2006}, abstract = {1. Problemstellung Die Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien stellt eine volkswirtschaftliche Problematik dar, die einerseits eine Vielzahl theoretisch ungel{\"o}ster Fragen aufwirft und f{\"u}r die andererseits nunmehr auch in Deutschland wirtschaftspolitische Erfahrungen vorliegen. Die Ursachen der {\"o}konomischen Probleme sind dabei nicht nur in bestimmten Branchenbesonderheiten der Netzindustrien zu suchen, sondern auch in einer verfehlten ordnungspolitischen Sonderbehandlung der netzgebundenen Wirtschaftsbereiche in der Vergangenheit. Entgegen den f{\"u}r eine marktwirtschaftliche Ordnung charakteristischen Prinzipien Wettbewerb und Privateigentum wurden Netzindustrien traditionell als wettbewerbliche Ausnahmebereiche behandelt und zumeist in Form {\"o}ffentlicher Unternehmen gef{\"u}hrt. Die Folge dessen waren (staatliche) Monopole, die eine relativ hohe Ineffizienz aufwiesen. Die ordnungspolitische Konsequenz dieses Befundes lautete daher Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien durch Privatisierung und Markt{\"o}ffnung, d. h. ein Abbau von Marktzutrittsschranken durch Deregulierung. Wettbewerb st{\"o}ßt in Netzindustrien jedoch an Grenzen, weil die zur Produktion netzgebundener Dienstleistungen erforderliche Infrastruktur typischerweise ein nicht-angreifbares, nat{\"u}rliches Monopol darstellt, das sich in der Hand eines im Markt eingesessenen, vertikal integrierten Anbieters befindet. Daraus ergeben sich weitreichende M{\"o}glichkeiten zur Diskriminierung von Konkurrenten, die wettbewerbspolitischen Handlungsbedarf nach sich ziehen. Diesen gilt es in der vorliegenden Arbeit zu analysieren und alternative L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze der Diskriminierungsproblematik zu diskutieren. 2. Besonderes Forschungsziel Die vorliegende Dissertation widmet sich der Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien aus {\"o}konomischer Sicht, wobei insbesondere die Interdependenzen zwischen der Eigentums- und der Diskriminierungsproblematik ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Gleichwohl bildet die wettbewerbliche {\"O}ffnung der M{\"a}rkte f{\"u}r netzgebundene Dienstleistungen aus volkswirtschaftlicher Sicht das Kernproblem und somit auch den zentralen Untersuchungsgegenstand dieser Arbeit. Die theoretische Analyse bleibt dabei nicht auf einen Forschungsansatz beschr{\"a}nkt, sondern es werden mehrere Facetten der Liberalisierung von der Ordnungs- {\"u}ber die Netz{\"o}konomik bis hin zur politischen {\"O}konomie betrachtet. In empirischer Hinsicht haben die in Deutschland in verschiedenen Netzindustrien realisierten Markt{\"o}ffnungen bislang zu unterschiedlich intensiven Wettbewerbsprozessen gef{\"u}hrt. Daher wird ein problemorientierter, intersektoraler Vergleich der Reformen und eine wettbewerbs-politische Beurteilung anhand der drei Marktmerkmale Marktstruktur, Marktverhalten und Marktergebnis vorgenommen, um die Liberalisierung in einzelnen Netzindustrien zu bewerten. Die Telekommunikation gilt dabei als Musterbeispiel f{\"u}r eine erfolgreiche Liberalisierung, weil die Deregulierung hier durch eine sektorspezifische Marktmachtkontrolle begleitet wird, wof{\"u}r eigens eine Regulierungsbeh{\"o}rde geschaffen wurde. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird der mangelnde Wettbewerb in der Strom- und vor allem in der Gasversorgung sowie im Schienenverkehr h{\"a}ufig auf das Fehlen solcher Institutionen zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt. Aufgrund dessen werden hier die Eisenbahn, die Telekommunikation im Festnetz und die leitungsgebundene Energieversorgung als empirische Analyseobjekte ausgew{\"a}hlt, um die im Laufe der Untersuchung gewonnenen theoretischen Erkenntnisse exemplarisch an diesen Netzindustrien aufzuzeigen und die im Folgenden formulierte Arbeitshypothese zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen. 3. Methodik Die Arbeit gliedert sich in einen theoretischen und einen empirischen Teil. Die theoretisch zu untersuchende Frage bei der Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien lautet: Welcher institutionellen Arrangements bedarf es in Netzindustrien, um vormals monopolistisch organisierte in kompetitive M{\"a}rkte zu {\"u}berf{\"u}hren und darin nachhaltig einen effektiven Wettbewerb zu etablieren? Auf der Grundlage der erarbeiteten ordnungs- und wettbewerbs{\"o}konomischen Erkenntnisse wird nach allgemeing{\"u}ltigen Kriterien gesucht, um daraus einen Bewertungsmaßstab f{\"u}r den intersektoralen Vergleich von Liberalisierungsprozessen in verschiedenen Netzindustrien zu entwickeln. Als Arbeitsthese der empirischen {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung im zweiten Teil dient die aus verschiedenen {\"o}konomischen Blickwinkeln gewonnene und theoretisch zu fundierende Vermutung, dass es zur wirksamen Markt{\"o}ffnung in Netzindustrien einer materiellen Privatisierung sowie einer effektiven und effizienten Marktmachtkontrolle im Bereich des Zugangs zur Netzinfrastruktur bedarf. Anhand dieser These werden die Liberalisierungsprozesse in den Netzsektoren Schienenverkehr, Telekommunikation sowie Energieversorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland aus volkswirtschaftlicher Sicht beurteilt, und es wird auf verbleibenden ordnungspolitischen Reformbedarf hingewiesen. Die theoretischen Ergebnisse sind indes auch auf {\"a}hnliche, hier nicht dargestellte Infrastruktursektoren {\"u}bertragbar.}, subject = {Deregulierung}, language = {de} } @techreport{Schulze1999, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Schulze, Andreas}, title = {Die ordnungspolitische Problematik von Netzinfrastrukturen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-13634}, year = {1999}, abstract = {Inhalt - Einf{\"u}hrung in die Netz{\"o}konomik - Theoretischer Bezugsrahmen zur normativen Analyse derMarkt- und Wettbewerbsverh{\"a}ltnisse in Netzindustrien - Institutionelle Arrangements der Marktorganisation von Netzen}, language = {de} } @techreport{Schulze2003, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Schulze, Andreas}, title = {Liberalisierung und Re-regulierung von Netzindustrien}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-13847}, year = {2003}, abstract = {Inhalt 1 Ziele der Liberalisierung von Netzindustrien:Privatisierung staatlicher Monopole und wettbewerbliche Markt{\"o}ffnung 2 Markt- und wettbewerbstheoretische Aspekte der Netzinfrastruktur 2.1 Netze als Teil der materiellen Infrastruktur 2.2 Netzinfrastruktur als {\"o}ffentliches Gut oderInstrument der Daseinsvorsorge? 2.3 Netze als nat{\"u}rliche Monopole? 2.3.1 Nutzenrelevante Netzeffekte 2.3.2 Kostenbestimmende Netzeffekte 2.3.3 Wettbewerbspotenziale trotz Wettbewerbsversagen 3 Wettbewerbs{\"o}konomische Implikationen f{\"u}r Netzindustrien 3.1 Vertikale Integration in Netzindustrien 3.1.1 Transaktionskosten versus vertikale Integration 3.1.2 Wettbewerbs{\"o}konomische Probleme 3.2 Netzzugangsmodelle 3.3 Institutionelle Ausgestaltung der Wettbewerbsaufsicht 4 Fazit}, language = {de} } @techreport{Schulze2004, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Schulze, Andreas}, title = {Liberalisierungen in Netzindustrien aus polit-{\"o}konomischer Sicht}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-14147}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Inhalt 1 Politikzyklus als konzeptioneller Bezugsrahmen 2 {\"O}konomische Problematik von Netzindustrien und Liberalisierungsgr{\"u}nde 3 Privatisierung und Markt{\"o}ffnung als wirtschaftspolitische Aufgaben 4 Politisierung von Liberalisierungsinteressen 4.1 Politiker als Intermedi{\"a}re 4.2 Zielkonflikte und Interdependenzen mit anderen Politikfeldern 5 Rent-Seeking-Aktivit{\"a}ten in Netzindustrien 5.1 Der „Markt" f{\"u}r Rent-Seeking-Aktivit{\"a}ten 5.2 Der „Wettbewerb" von Interessengruppen 6 Administrative Umsetzung und Evaluierung von Liberalisierungen 7 Fazit}, language = {de} }