@article{AbeysekaraArcherBenbowetal.2018,
  author    = {Abeysekara, A. U. and Archer, A. and Benbow, Wystan and Bird, Ralph and Brose, Robert and Buchovecky, M. and Buckley, J. H. and Bugaev, V. and Chromey, A. J. and Connolly, M. P. and Cui, Wei and Daniel, M. K. and Falcone, A. and Feng, Qi and Finley, John P. and Fortson, L. and Furniss, Amy and Huetten, M. and Hanna, David and Hervet, O. and Holder, J. and Hughes, G. and Humensky, T. B. and Johnson, Caitlin A. and Kaaret, Philip and Kar, P. and Kertzman, M. and Kieda, David and Krause, M. and Krennrich, F. and Kumar, S. and Lang, M. J. and Lin, T. T. Y. and McArthur, S. and Moriarty, P. and Mukherjee, Reshmi and Ong, R. A. and Otte, Adam Nepomuk and Park, Nahee and Petrashyk, A. and Pohl, Martin and Pueschel, Elisa and Quinn, J. and Ragan, K. and Reynolds, P. T. and Richards, Gregory T. and Roache, E. and Rulten, C. and Sadeh, I. and Santander, Marcos and Sembroski, G. H. and Shahinyan, Karlen and Sushch, I. and Tyler, J. and Wakely, S. P. and Weinstein, A. and Wells, R. M. and Wilcox, P. and Wilhelm, Alina and Williams, D. A. and Williamson, T. J. and Zitzer, B. and Abdollahi, S. and Ajello, Marco and Baldini, Luca and Barbiellini, G. and Bastieri, Denis and Bellazzini, Ronaldo and Berenji, B. and Bissaldi, Elisabetta and Blandford, R. D. and Bonino, R. and Bottacini, E. and Brandt, Terri J. and Bruel, P. and Buehler, R. and Cameron, R. A. and Caputo, R. and Caraveo, P. A. and Castro, D. and Cavazzuti, E. and Charles, Eric and Chiaro, G. and Ciprini, S. and Cohen-Tanugi, Johann and Costantin, D. and Cutini, S. and de Palma, F. and Di Lalla, N. and Di Mauro, M. and Di Venere, L. and Dominguez, A. and Favuzzi, C. and Fegan, S. J. and Franckowiak, Anna and Fukazawa, Yasushi and Funk, Stefan and Fusco, Piergiorgio and Gargano, Fabio and Gasparrini, Dario and Giglietto, Nicola and Giordano, F. and Giroletti, Marcello and Green, D. and Grenier, I. A. and Guillemot, L. and Guiriec, Sylvain and Hays, Elizabeth and Hewitt, John W. and Horan, D. and Johannesson, G. and Kensei, S. and Kuss, M. and Larsson, Stefan and Latronico, L. and Lemoine-Goumard, Marianne and Li, J. and Longo, Francesco and Loparco, Francesco and Lovellette, M. N. and Lubrano, Pasquale and Magill, Jeffrey D. and Maldera, Simone and Mazziotta, Mario Nicola and McEnery, J. E. and Michelson, P. F. and Mitthumsiri, W. and Mizuno, Tsunefumi and Monzani, Maria Elena and Morselli, Aldo and Moskalenko, Igor V. and Negro, M. and Nuss, E. and Ojha, R. and Omodei, Nicola and Orienti, M. and Orlando, E. and Palatiello, M. and Paliya, Vaidehi S. and Paneque, D. and Perkins, Jeremy S. and Persic, M. and Pesce-Rollins, Melissa and Petrosian, Vahe' and Piron, F. and Porter, Troy A. and Principe, G. and Raino, S. and Rando, Riccardo and Rani, B. and Razzano, Massimilano and Razzaque, Soebur and Reimer, A. and Reimer, Olaf and Reposeur, T. and Sgro, C. and Siskind, E. J. and Spandre, Gloria and Spinelli, P. and Suson, D. J. and Tajima, Hiroyasu and Thayer, J. B. and Thompson, David J. and Torres, Diego F. and Tosti, Gino and Troja, Eleonora and Valverde, J. and Vianello, Giacomo and Vogel, M. and Wood, K. and Yassine, M. and Alfaro, R. and Alvarez, C. and Alvarez, J. D. and Arceo, R. and Arteaga-Velazquez, J. C. and Rojas, D. Avila and Ayala Solares, H. A. and Becerril, A. and Belmont-Moreno, E. and BenZvi, S. Y. and Bernal, A. and Braun, J. and Brisbois, C. and Caballero-Mora, K. S. and Capistran, T. and Carraminana, A. and Casanova, Sabrina and Castillo, M. and Cotti, U. and Cotzomi, J. and Coutino de Leon, S. and De Leon, C. and De la Fuente, E. and Dichiara, S. and Dingus, B. L. and DuVernois, M. A. and Diaz-Velez, J. C. and Engel, K. and Enriquez-Rivera, O. and Fiorino, D. W. and Fleischhack, H. and Fraija, N. and Garcia-Gonzalez, J. A. and Garfias, F. and Gonzalez Munoz, A. and Gonzalez, M. M. and Goodman, J. A. and Hampel-Arias, Z. and Harding, J. P. and Hernandez, S. and Hernandez-Almada, A. and Hona, B. and Hueyotl-Zahuantitla, F. and Hui, C. M. and Huntemeyer, P. and Iriarte, A. and Jardin-Blicq, A. and Joshi, V. and Kaufmann, S. and Lara, A. and Lauer, R. J. and Lee, W. H. and Lennarz, D. and Leon Vargas, H. and Linnemann, J. T. and Longinotti, A. L. and Luis-Raya, G. and Luna-Garcia, R. and Lopez-Coto, R. and Malone, K. and Marinelli, S. S. and Martinez, O. and Martinez-Castellanos, I. and Martinez-Castro, J. and Martinez-Huerta, H. and Matthews, J. A. and Miranda-Romagnoli, P. and Moreno, E. and Mostafa, M. and Nayerhoda, A. and Nellen, L. and Newbold, M. and Nisa, M. U. and Noriega-Papaqui, R. and Pelayo, R. and Pretz, J. and Perez-Perez, E. G. and Ren, Z. and Rho, C. D. and Riviere, C. and Rosa-Gonzalez, D. and Rosenberg, M. and Ruiz-Velasco, E. and Salazar, H. and Greus, F. Salesa and Sandoval, A. and Schneider, M. and Arroyo, M. Seglar and Sinnis, G. and Smith, A. J. and Springer, R. W. and Surajbali, P. and Taboada, Ignacio and Tibolla, O. and Tollefson, K. and Torres, I. and Ukwatta, Tilan N. and Villasenor, L. and Weisgarber, T. and Westerhoff, Stefan and Wisher, I. G. and Wood, J. and Yapici, Tolga and Yodh, G. and Zepeda, A. and Zhou, H.},
  title     = {VERITAS and Fermi-LAT Observations of TeV Gamma-Ray Sources Discovered by HAWC in the 2HWC Catalog},
  series = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  volume    = {866},
  journal   = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {IOP Publ. Ltd.},
  address   = {Bristol},
  organization    = {VERITAS Collaboration Fermi-LAT Collaboration HAWC Collaboration},
  issn      = {0004-637X},
  doi       = {10.3847/1538-4357/aade4e},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) collaboration recently published their 2HWC catalog, listing 39 very high energy (VHE; >100 GeV) gamma-ray sources based on 507 days of observation. Among these, 19 sources are not associated with previously known teraelectronvolt (TeV) gamma-ray sources. We have studied 14 of these sources without known counterparts with VERITAS and Fermi-LAT. VERITAS detected weak gamma-ray emission in the 1 TeV-30 TeV band in the region of DA 495, a pulsar wind nebula coinciding with 2HWC J1953+294, confirming the discovery of the source by HAWC. We did not find any counterpart for the selected 14 new HAWC sources from our analysis of Fermi-LAT data for energies higher than 10 GeV. During the search, we detected gigaelectronvolt (GeV) gamma-ray emission coincident with a known TeV pulsar wind nebula, SNR G54.1+0.3 (VER J1930+188), and a 2HWC source, 2HWC J1930+188. The fluxes for isolated, steady sources in the 2HWC catalog are generally in good agreement with those measured by imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. However, the VERITAS fluxes for SNR G54.1+0.3, DA 495, and TeV J2032+4130 are lower than those measured by HAWC, and several new HAWC sources are not detected by VERITAS. This is likely due to a change in spectral shape, source extension, or the influence of diffuse emission in the source region.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LiemohnMcColloughJordanovaetal.2018,
  author    = {Liemohn, Michael W. and McCollough, James P. and Jordanova, Vania K. and Ngwira, Chigomezyo M. and Morley, Steven K. and Cid, Consuelo and Tobiska, W. Kent and Wintoft, Peter and Ganushkina, Natalia Yu and Welling, Daniel T. and Bingham, Suzy and Balikhin, Michael A. and Opgenoorth, Hermann J. and Engel, Miles A. and Weigel, Robert S. and Singer, Howard J. and Buresova, Dalia and Bruinsma, Sean and Zhelavskaya, Irina and Shprits, Yuri Y. and Vasile, Ruggero},
  title     = {Model Evaluation Guidelines for Geomagnetic Index Predictions},
  series = {Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications},
  number    = {12},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {1542-7390},
  doi       = {10.1029/2018SW002067},
  pages     = {2079 -- 2102},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Geomagnetic indices are convenient quantities that distill the complicated physics of some region or aspect of near-Earth space into a single parameter. Most of the best-known indices are calculated from ground-based magnetometer data sets, such as Dst, SYM-H, Kp, AE, AL, and PC. Many models have been created that predict the values of these indices, often using solar wind measurements upstream from Earth as the input variables to the calculation. This document reviews the current state of models that predict geomagnetic indices and the methods used to assess their ability to reproduce the target index time series. These existing methods are synthesized into a baseline collection of metrics for benchmarking a new or updated geomagnetic index prediction model. These methods fall into two categories: (1) fit performance metrics such as root-mean-square error and mean absolute error that are applied to a time series comparison of model output and observations and (2) event detection performance metrics such as Heidke Skill Score and probability of detection that are derived from a contingency table that compares model and observation values exceeding (or not) a threshold value. A few examples of codes being used with this set of metrics are presented, and other aspects of metrics assessment best practices, limitations, and uncertainties are discussed, including several caveats to consider when using geomagnetic indices. Plain Language Summary One aspect of space weather is a magnetic signature across the surface of the Earth. The creation of this signal involves nonlinear interactions of electromagnetic forces on charged particles and can therefore be difficult to predict. The perturbations that space storms and other activity causes in some observation sets, however, are fairly regular in their pattern. Some of these measurements have been compiled together into a single value, a geomagnetic index. Several such indices exist, providing a global estimate of the activity in different parts of geospace. Models have been developed to predict the time series of these indices, and various statistical methods are used to assess their performance at reproducing the original index. Existing studies of geomagnetic indices, however, use different approaches to quantify the performance of the model. This document defines a standardized set of statistical analyses as a baseline set of comparison tools that are recommended to assess geomagnetic index prediction models. It also discusses best practices, limitations, uncertainties, and caveats to consider when conducting a model assessment.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{WannickeEndresEngeletal.2012,
  author    = {Wannicke, Nicola and Endres, S. and Engel, A. and Grossart, Hans-Peter and Nausch, M. and Unger, J. and Voss, Martin},
  title     = {Response of nodularia spumigena to pCO(2) - Part 1: Growth, production and nitrogen cycling},
  series = {Biogeosciences},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Biogeosciences},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Copernicus},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1726-4170},
  doi       = {10.5194/bg-9-2973-2012},
  pages     = {2973 -- 2988},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Heterocystous cyanobacteria of the genus Nodularia form extensive blooms in the Baltic Sea and contribute substantially to the total annual primary production. Moreover, they dispense a large fraction of new nitrogen to the ecosystem when inorganic nitrogen concentration in summer is low. Thus, it is of ecological importance to know how Nodularia will react to future environmental changes, in particular to increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and what consequences there might arise for cycling of organic matter in the Baltic Sea. Here, we determined carbon (C) and dinitrogen (N-2) fixation rates, growth, elemental stoichiometry of particulate organic matter and nitrogen turnover in batch cultures of the heterocystous cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena under low (median 315 mu atm), mid (median 353 mu atm), and high (median 548 mu atm) CO2 concentrations. Our results demonstrate an overall stimulating effect of rising pCO(2) on C and N-2 fixation, as well as on cell growth. An increase in pCO(2) during incubation days 0 to 9 resulted in an elevation in growth rate by 84 +/- 38\% (low vs. high pCO(2)) and 40 +/- 25\% (mid vs. high pCO(2)), as well as in N-2 fixation by 93 +/- 35\% and 38 +/- 1\%, respectively. C uptake rates showed high standard deviations within treatments and in between sampling days. Nevertheless, C fixation in the high pCO(2) treatment was elevated compared to the other two treatments by 97\% (high vs. low) and 44\% (high vs. mid) at day 0 and day 3, but this effect diminished afterwards. Additionally, elevation in carbon to nitrogen and nitrogen to phosphorus ratios of the particulate biomass formed (POC : POP and PON : POP) was observed at high pCO(2). Our findings suggest that rising pCO(2) stimulates the growth of heterocystous diazotrophic cyanobacteria, in a similar way as reported for the non-heterocystous diazotroph Trichodesmium. Implications for biogeochemical cycling and food web dynamics, as well as ecological and socio-economical aspects in the Baltic Sea are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}