@article{SalzwedelVoellerReibisetal.2018, author = {Salzwedel, Annett and Voeller, Heinz and Reibis, Robert and Bonaventura, Klaus and Behrens, Steffen and Reibis, Rona Katharina}, title = {Regionale Versorgungsaspekte des akuten Myokardinfarktes im Nordosten Deutschlands}, series = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, volume = {143}, journal = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, number = {8}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0012-0472}, doi = {10.1055/s-0043-123907}, pages = {E51 -- E58}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background In recent decades, guideline-based therapy of myocardial infarction has led to a considerable reduction in myocardial infarction mortality. However, there are relevant differences in acute care and the extent of infarction mortality. The objective of this survey was to analyze the current care situation of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the region of northeast Germany (Berlin, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern). Methods Based on pseudonymized data from a statutory health insurance of 1 387 084 persons, a total of 6733 patients with inpatient admission at MI were filtered using the ICD10 code I21 and I22 for 2012. Total inhospital mortality and 1-year mortality and prognostic parameters were evaluated and analyzed in country comparisons. Results Both the hospital mortality rate and the 1-year mortality rate of the individual countries (Berlin 13.6 resp. 27.5 \%, respectively, BRB 13.9 and 27.9 \%, MV 14.4 and 29.0 \%, respectively) were comparable to the overall rate (13.9 \% or 28.0 \%) and in the country comparison. In the multiple analysis, the 1-year mortality was determined by the invasive strategy (OR 0.42, 95 \% CI 0.35 -0.51, p < 0.001) as well as by the implementation of the guidelines-based secondary prevention (OR 0.14, 95 \% CI 0.12 - 0.17, p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the three federal states. Conclusion The investigated population of patients with acute MI in Berlin, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern demonstrated a comparable inpatient and post-hospital care and 1-year prognosis regardless of the federal state assignment. Referral to coronary angiography and adequate implementation of evidence-based medication demonstrated a significant prognostic impact.}, language = {de} } @misc{ReibisSalzwedelBonaventuraetal.2017, author = {Reibis, Rona Katharina and Salzwedel, Annett and Bonaventura, Klaus and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Wegscheider, Karl}, title = {Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {882}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43509}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435093}, pages = {10}, year = {2017}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30\% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 277 patients with reduced LVEF at least 1month after MI and complete revascularization. Patients (median time post-MI 23.4months; 74.3\% after PCI, 25.7\% after CABG were assigned either to group 1 (LVEF<30\%) or group 2 (LVEF 30-40\%). Biplane echocardiography was redone after a mean follow-up of 441±220days. RESULTS: LVEF increased significantly in both two groups (group 1: 26.2±4.8\% to 32.4±8.5\%; p<0.001; group 2: 38.2±2.5\% to 44.4±9.6\%; p<0.001). However, statistical analysis of first and second LVEF measurement by means of a LOWESS regression and with an appropriate correction of the regression towards the mean effect revealed only a moderate increase of the mean LVEF from 35 to 37\% (p<0.001) with a large interindividual variation. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of early revascularization on LVEF appears to be low in the majority of post-MI heart failure patients. Owing to the high variability, a single measurement may not be reliable enough to justify a decision on ICD indication.}, language = {en} } @article{ReibisSalzwedelFalketal.2017, author = {Reibis, Rona Katharina and Salzwedel, Annett and Falk, Johannes and V{\"o}ller, Heinz}, title = {Berufliche Wiedereingliederung nach akutem Herzinfarkt}, series = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, volume = {142}, journal = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0012-0472}, doi = {10.1055/s-0042-124425}, pages = {617 -- 624}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Die berufliche Wiedereingliederung von Patienten nach akutem Herzinfarkt stellt sowohl aus gesellschaftlicher wie auch aus individueller Sicht einen entscheidenden Schritt zur vollst{\"a}ndigen Rekonvaleszenz dar. Lediglich 10\% der Patienten werden durch kardiale Probleme an der Reintegration behindert. Neben medizinischen und berufsbezogenen Faktoren determinieren insbesondere psychosoziale Parameter eine erfolgreiche Wiederaufnahme der T{\"a}tigkeit. Verschiedene Programme der Rentenversicherungstr{\"a}ger werden dabei unterst{\"u}tzend angeboten.}, language = {de} }