@misc{KruegerKellingLinkeretal.2019,
  author    = {Krueger, Tobias and Kelling, Alexandra and Linker, Torsten and Schilde, Uwe},
  title     = {Crystal structures of three cyclohexane‑based γ‑spirolactams},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {738},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43491},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434911},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The title compounds, 2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₉H₁₅NO, (1a), cis-8-methyl-2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₁₀H₁₇NO, (1b), and trans-8-methyl-2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₁₀H₁₇NO, (1c), were synthesized from benzoic acids 2 in only 3 steps in high yields. Crystallization from n-hexane afforded single crystals, suitable for X-ray diffraction. Thus, the configurations, conformations, and interesting crystal packing effects have been determined unequivocally. The bicyclic skeleton consists of a lactam ring, attached by a spiro junction to a cyclohexane ring. The lactam ring adopts an envelope conformation and the cyclohexane ring has a chair conformation. The main difference between compound 1b and compound 1c is the position of the carbonyl group on the 2-pyrrolidine ring with respect to the methyl group on the 8-position of the cyclohexane ring, which is cis (1b) or trans (1c). A remarkable feature of all three compounds is the existence of a mirror plane within the molecule. Given that all compounds crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups, the packing always contains interesting enantiomer-like pairs. Finally, the structures are stabilized by intermolecular N-H···O hydrogen bonds.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KruegerMaynardCarretal.2016,
  author    = {Krueger, Tobias and Maynard, Carly and Carr, Gemma and Bruns, Antje and M{\"u}ller, Eva Nora and Lane, Stuart},
  title     = {A transdisciplinary account of water research},
  series = {Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews : Water},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews : Water},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {2049-1948},
  doi       = {10.1002/wat2.1132},
  pages     = {369 -- 389},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Water research is introduced from the combined perspectives of natural and social science and cases of citizen and stakeholder coproduction of knowledge. Using the overarching notion of transdisciplinarity, we examine how interdisciplinary and participatory water research has taken place and could be developed further. It becomes apparent that water knowledge is produced widely within society, across certified disciplinary experts and noncertified expert stakeholders and citizens. However, understanding and management interventions may remain partial, or even conflicting, as much research across and between traditional disciplines has failed to integrate disciplinary paradigms due to philosophical, methodological, and communication barriers. We argue for more agonistic relationships that challenge both certified and noncertified knowledge productively. These should include examination of how water research itself embeds and is embedded in social context and performs political work. While case studies of the cultural and political economy of water knowledge exist, we need more empirical evidence on how exactly culture, politics, and economics have shaped this knowledge and how and at what junctures this could have turned out differently. We may thus channel the coproductionist critique productively to bring perspectives, alternative knowledges, and implications into water politics where they were not previously considered; in an attempt to counter potential lock-in to particular water policies and technologies that may be inequitable, unsustainable, or unacceptable. While engaging explicitly with politics, transdisciplinary water research should remain attentive to closing down moments in the research process, such as framings, path-dependencies, vested interests, researchers' positionalities, power, and scale.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KruegerKellingLinkeretal.2019,
  author    = {Krueger, Tobias and Kelling, Alexandra and Linker, Torsten and Schilde, Uwe},
  title     = {Crystal structures of three cyclohexane‑based γ‑spirolactams},
  series = {BMC Chemistry},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {BMC Chemistry},
  number    = {69},
  publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2661-801X},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13065-019-0586-7},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The title compounds, 2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₉H₁₅NO, (1a), cis-8-methyl-2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₁₀H₁₇NO, (1b), and trans-8-methyl-2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-1-one, C₁₀H₁₇NO, (1c), were synthesized from benzoic acids 2 in only 3 steps in high yields. Crystallization from n-hexane afforded single crystals, suitable for X-ray diffraction. Thus, the configurations, conformations, and interesting crystal packing effects have been determined unequivocally. The bicyclic skeleton consists of a lactam ring, attached by a spiro junction to a cyclohexane ring. The lactam ring adopts an envelope conformation and the cyclohexane ring has a chair conformation. The main difference between compound 1b and compound 1c is the position of the carbonyl group on the 2-pyrrolidine ring with respect to the methyl group on the 8-position of the cyclohexane ring, which is cis (1b) or trans (1c). A remarkable feature of all three compounds is the existence of a mirror plane within the molecule. Given that all compounds crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups, the packing always contains interesting enantiomer-like pairs. Finally, the structures are stabilized by intermolecular N-H···O hydrogen bonds.},
  language  = {en}
}