@article{Krueger2003,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Amira, Mehmet et leur enfants : sur l'opposition concr{\`e}te entre droits de l'homme et droits du citoyen},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Krueger1996,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Angst vor der Selbstentsicherung : zum gegenw{\"a}rtigen Streit um Helmuth Plessners philosophische Anthropologie},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2004,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Brain in the context of eccentric positioning : philosophical challenges to neurobiological brain research},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Krueger2020,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Closed environment and open world},
  series = {Jakob von Uexk{\"u}ll and philosophy: life, environments, anthropology},
  booktitle = {Jakob von Uexk{\"u}ll and philosophy: life, environments, anthropology},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-429-27909-6},
  doi       = {10.4324/9780429279096},
  pages     = {89 -- 105},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {According to Plessner, both adaptation and selection can be conceived not just as requested by the environment but also as actively proceeding from the organism. In this respect, Plessner finds in Uexk{\"u}ll's new biology a powerful counterweight to the constraints of Darwinism. However, despite all the points in common in their respective understanding of the problem, Plessner reproaches to Uexk{\"u}ll to have entirely missed the intermediate layer of the lived body [Leib] between the organism and its environment. Unlike Uexk{\"u}ll, concerning the more developed animals, Plessner took up elements of animal psychology from Wolfgang K{\"o}hler and Frederik Jacobus Johannes Buytendijk. Finally, Plessner finds insufficiencies also in Uexk{\"u}ll's distinction between the notion of world and the notion of environment, which would lead to the parallel positing of different environments. In reaction to Uexk{\"u}ll's leveling of all environments, Plessner drafted a philosophical-anthropological spectrum between the intelligent way of living observed in the great apes, whose intelligence had been demonstrated, and the co-wordly life of the symbolic mind as seen in the personal sphere of human life.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DemmerlingKruegerHabermas2016,
  author    = {Demmerling, Christoph and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Communicative Reason Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0061},
  pages     = {806 -- 827},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Jurgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2016,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Critical Anthropology? To the Relationship between Philosophical Anthropology and Critical Theory},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0041},
  pages     = {553 -- 580},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This article compares Max Horkheimer's and Theodor W. Adorno's foundation of the Frankfurt Critical Theory with Helmuth Plessner's foundation of Philosophical Anthropology. While Horkheimer's and Plessner's paradigms are mutually incompatible, Adorno's „negative dialectics" and Plessner's „negative anthropology" (G. Gamm) can be seen as complementing one another. J{\"u}rgen Habermas at one point sketched a complementary relationship between his own publicly communicative theory of modern society and Plessner's philosophy of nature and human expressivity, and though he then came to doubt this, he later reaffirmed it. Faced with the „life power" in „high capitalism" (Plessner), the ambitions for a public democracy in a pluralistic society have to be broadened from an argumentative focus (Habermas) to include the human condition and the expressive modes of our experience as essentially embodied persons. The article discusses some possible aspects of this complementarity under the title of a „critical anthropology" (H. Schn{\"a}delbach).},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Intellektuelle : seine Befreiung durch seine Selbstbejahung in einer gewaltenteiligen Moderne},
  isbn      = {3-935693-18-4},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{EbkeZanfiKruegeretal.2017,
  author    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Sommer, Christian and Viennet, Thomas and Johannßen, Dennis and Balzaretti, Ugo and Toussaint Ondoua, Herv{\´e} and Agard, Olivier and Henckmann, Wolfhart and Simonotti, Edoardo and Hand, Annika and Tavakkoli, Amirpasha and Hackbarth, Daniel and Edinger, Sebastian and Schollmeyer, Justus and von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander and Schmieg, Gregor and Batista Rates, Bruno and Kressmann, Philipp and Hilt, Annette and van Buuren, Jasper and Keusch, Juliane and Guzun, Mădălina and Bruff, Kyla and Stahl, Marion and Held, Lukas},
  title     = {Das Leben im Menschen oder der Mensch im Leben?},
  editor    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-382-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95409},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {514 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts wird deutlich, dass es in Frankreich und in Deutschland voneinander abweichende Sichtweisen auf die Frage gibt, ob der Mensch eine "Sonderstellung" in der Dynamik des biologischen und geschichtlichen Lebens genießt. W{\"a}hrend sich in Deutschland die Tradition eines anthropologischen Denkens neu formiert, ist in Frankreich eine scharfe Skepsis gegen{\"u}ber dem Erbe des Humanismus charakteristisch. Die Beitr{\"a}ge dieses zweisprachigen Buches untersuchen diese deutsch-franz{\"o}sische Konstellation von Fragen und Autoren, und aktualisieren die Reflexion auf die (Grenzen der) Singularit{\"a}t des Menschen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1998,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Nirgendwo im Dasein : Joachim Fests Utopieverbot und Inge M{\"u}nz-Koenens Diskursanalyse utopischen Denkens},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2000,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Schauspiel der Kultur im Spiegel der Natur : Einleitung in den Schwerpunkt ; Helmuth Plessners Philosophische Anthropologie},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {de}
}