@article{Jann1994,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Common security in the Baltic Sea region : the view from the German L{\"a}nder},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1994,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Cooperation in nothern Europe for an active society},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1996,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Public management in Germany : a revolution without a theory?},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1997,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Public management reform in Germany : a revolution without a theory?},
  year      = {1997},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1998,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Report of the working group on transparency, openness and service to the public},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann2001,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Managing parliaments in the 21st Century : from Policy-Making and Public Management to Governance},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannReichard2001,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Reichard, Christoph},
  title     = {Best practice in central government modernization},
  series = {RIEP : Revista internacional de estudos politicos},
  volume    = {2001},
  journal   = {RIEP : Revista internacional de estudos politicos},
  number    = {Special 9},
  editor    = {Wollmann, Hellmut},
  publisher = {NUSEG},
  address   = {Rio de Janeiro},
  issn      = {1516-5973},
  pages     = {93 -- 111},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannReichard2001,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Reichard, Christoph},
  title     = {Best Practice in Central Government Modernization},
  issn      = {1516-5973},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannDoehler2002,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and D{\"o}hler, Marian},
  title     = {Germany},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann2003,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {State, administration and governance in Germany: competing traditions and dominant narratives},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannReichard2003,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Reichard, Christoph},
  title     = {Evaluating best practice in central government modernization},
  isbn      = {1-8437-6160-2},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann2007,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Public administration under pressure : the search for new forms of public governance},
  isbn      = {978-92-1-123175-5},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannLaegreidVerhoest2007,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Laegreid, Per and Verhoest, Koen},
  title     = {Introduction},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852307081143},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannJantz2008,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian},
  title     = {A better performance and performance management?},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannSeyfried2009,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Seyfried, Markus},
  title     = {Does executive governance matter? executives an policy performance},
  isbn      = {978-3-86793-013-0},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannBach2009,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Bach, Tobias},
  title     = {Structure and governance of agencies in Germany : a lot of continuity and little change},
  isbn      = {978-82-450-0754-1},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BachJann2010,
  author    = {Bach, Tobias and Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Animals in the administrative zoo : organizational change and agency autonomy in Germany},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852310372448},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Although Germany does not figure among the 'forerunners' of managerial reforms of the public sector, it has a long tradition of agencies and non-departmental bodies at the federal level. Over time, the federal administration has developed into a highly differentiated 'administrative zoo' with a large number of species, questioning the image of a well-ordered German bureaucracy. The article addresses organizational changes among non-ministerial agencies during the past 20 years and ministry-agency relations, drawing on data from a comprehensive survey of the federal administration. The structural changes we observe are neither comprehensive nor planned; they are much more evolutionary than revolutionary, driven by sectoral policies and not by any overall agency policy, supported more by regulatory than by managerial reforms, and most of the changes are horizontal mergers or successions of existing organizations, while we find almost no evidence for hiving-off from ministries to agencies. At the same time, federal agencies report a lot of bureaucratic discretion, whereas they perceive substantial levels of 'red tape' due to administrative regulations. We also find that traditional, hierarchical modes of ministerial oversight are still dominating; only few agencies have performance agreements with measurable goals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannFleischer2011,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Fleischer, Julia},
  title     = {Shefting discourses, steady learning and sedimentation : the German reform trajectory in the long run},
  isbn      = {978-0-415-55721-4},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannJantz2013,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian},
  title     = {Mapping accountability changes in labour market administration : from concentrated to shared accountability?},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JantzJann2013,
  author    = {Jantz, Bastian and Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Mapping accountability changes in labour market administrations from concentrated to shared accountability?},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {79},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852313477764},
  pages     = {227 -- 248},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The article explores how recent changes in the governance of employment services in three European countries (Denmark, Germany and Norway) have influenced accountability relationships. The overall assumption in the growing literature about accountability is that the number of actors involved in accountability arrangements is rising, that accountability relationships are becoming more numerous and complex, and that these changes may lead to contradictory accountability relationships, and finally to multi accountability disorder'. The article tries to explore these assumptions by analysing the different actors involved and the information requested in the new governance arrangements in all three countries. It concludes that the considerable changes in organizational arrangements and more managerial information demanded and provided have led to more shared forms of accountability. Nevertheless, a clear development towards less political or administrative accountability could not be observed.},
  language  = {en}
}