@article{Jann2003,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {State, administration and governance in Germany: competing traditions and dominant narratives},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1994,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Common security in the Baltic Sea region : the view from the German L{\"a}nder},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1994,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Cooperation in nothern Europe for an active society},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1996,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Public management in Germany : a revolution without a theory?},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1998,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Report of the working group on transparency, openness and service to the public},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann1997,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Public management reform in Germany : a revolution without a theory?},
  year      = {1997},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jann2001,
  author    = {Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Managing parliaments in the 21st Century : from Policy-Making and Public Management to Governance},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannBach2009,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Bach, Tobias},
  title     = {Structure and governance of agencies in Germany : a lot of continuity and little change},
  isbn      = {978-82-450-0754-1},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannDoehler2002,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and D{\"o}hler, Marian},
  title     = {Germany},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannFleischer2011,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Fleischer, Julia},
  title     = {Shefting discourses, steady learning and sedimentation : the German reform trajectory in the long run},
  isbn      = {978-0-415-55721-4},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannJantz2008,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian},
  title     = {A better performance and performance management?},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannJantz2013,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian},
  title     = {Mapping accountability changes in labour market administration : from concentrated to shared accountability?},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannJantz2013,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian},
  title     = {The development of policy analysis in Germany : practical problems and theoretical concepts},
  isbn      = {978-1- 44730-625-2},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannReichard2001,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Reichard, Christoph},
  title     = {Best practice in central government modernization},
  series = {RIEP : Revista internacional de estudos politicos},
  volume    = {2001},
  journal   = {RIEP : Revista internacional de estudos politicos},
  number    = {Special 9},
  editor    = {Wollmann, Hellmut},
  publisher = {NUSEG},
  address   = {Rio de Janeiro},
  issn      = {1516-5973},
  pages     = {93 -- 111},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannSeyfried2009,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Seyfried, Markus},
  title     = {Does executive governance matter? executives an policy performance},
  isbn      = {978-3-86793-013-0},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JannWegrich2019,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Wegrich, Kai},
  title     = {Generalists and specialists in executive politics: Why ambitious meta-policies so often fail},
  series = {Public administration},
  volume    = {97},
  journal   = {Public administration},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0033-3298},
  doi       = {10.1111/padm.12614},
  pages     = {845 -- 860},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This article contributes to the politics of policy-making in executive government. It introduces the analytical distinction between generalists and specialists as antagonistic players in executive politics and develops the claim that policy specialists are in a structurally advantaged position to succeed in executive politics and to fend off attempts by generalists to influence policy choices through cross-cutting reform measures. Contrary to traditional textbook public administration, we explain the views of generalists and specialists not through their training but their positions within an organization. We combine established approaches from public policy and organization theory to substantiate this claim and to define the dilemma that generalists face when developing government-wide reform policies ('meta-policies') as well as strategies to address this problem. The article suggests that the conceptual distinction between generalists and specialists allows for a more precise analysis of the challenges for policy-making across government organizations than established approaches.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JantzJann2013,
  author    = {Jantz, Bastian and Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Mapping accountability changes in labour market administrations from concentrated to shared accountability?},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {79},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852313477764},
  pages     = {227 -- 248},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The article explores how recent changes in the governance of employment services in three European countries (Denmark, Germany and Norway) have influenced accountability relationships. The overall assumption in the growing literature about accountability is that the number of actors involved in accountability arrangements is rising, that accountability relationships are becoming more numerous and complex, and that these changes may lead to contradictory accountability relationships, and finally to multi accountability disorder'. The article tries to explore these assumptions by analysing the different actors involved and the information requested in the new governance arrangements in all three countries. It concludes that the considerable changes in organizational arrangements and more managerial information demanded and provided have led to more shared forms of accountability. Nevertheless, a clear development towards less political or administrative accountability could not be observed.},
  language  = {en}
}