@incollection{BoehmHennemannMeisnitzer2022,
  author    = {B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja and Meisnitzer, Benjamin},
  title     = {Language contact and the linguistic coding of evidentiality in varieties of Spanish in Latin America},
  series = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages},
  booktitle = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  isbn      = {978-3-8253-4936-3},
  pages     = {117 -- 142},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{HennemannMeisnitzer2022,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja and Meisnitzer, Benjamin},
  title     = {An introduction to contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages},
  series = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages},
  booktitle = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages},
  publisher = {Heidelberg},
  address   = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter},
  isbn      = {978-3-8253-4936-3},
  pages     = {7 -- 13},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hennemann2021,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Mehr Schein als Sein},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-49073},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-490730},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this paper I am concerned with the idiomatic constructions fr. avoir l'air (de) and sp. tener el aire (de). I describe these form-function pairs from a constructionist perspective and analyze them as cases of evidential strategies in French and Spanish.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hennemann2020,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Reporting on 'thinking' in Spanish and Portuguese and the role of the subject pronoun},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47445},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-474455},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The present paper is concerned with the phenomenon of reporting on the speakers' thinking when both the reporting and the reported clauses originate in one and the same speaker, i.e. the performative uses of the verbs sp. creer and pt. achar ('think'). The data are retrieved from the CdE-NOW and CdP-NOW. Adopting both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective, I concentrate on reporting on thinking with and without the overt expression of the subject pronouns sp. yo and pt. eu. In doing so, the constructions (yo) creo (que) and (eu) acho (que) as well as parenthetic and right-peripheral creo yo and acho eu are studied. According to the corpus data and compared to other possible constructions with creo and acho, creo que and acho que represent the most frequent constructions if searching for the 'node' creo or acho, that is, if the non-use of the subject pronoun exceeds its explicit expression.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hennemann2020,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Topic and Focus Markers in Spanish, Portuguese and French},
  series = {Potsdam linguistic investigations ; 30},
  journal   = {Potsdam linguistic investigations ; 30},
  publisher = {Lang},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-631-82392-7},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {307},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This book is concerned with the diachronic development of selected topic and focus markers in Spanish, Portuguese and French. On the one hand, it focuses on the development of these structures from their relational meaning to their topic-/ focus-marking meaning, and on the other hand, it is concerned with their current form und use. Thus, Romance topic and focus markers - such as sp. en cuanto a, pt. a prop{\´o}sito de, fr. au niveau de or sentence-initial sp. Lo que as well as clefts and pseudo-clefts - are investigated from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. The author argues that topic markers have procedural meaning and that their function is bound to their syntactic position. An important contribution of this study is the fact that real linguistic evidence (in the form of data from various corpora) is analyzed instead of operating with constructed examples.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hennemann2020,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Tal vez es x vs. Tal ves sea X. Construcciones de probabilidad y el uso de los modos},
  series = {Romanica Olomucensia},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Romanica Olomucensia},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Univerzita Palack{\´e}ho v Olomouci},
  address   = {Olomouc},
  issn      = {1803-4136},
  doi       = {10.5507/ro.2020.003},
  pages     = {51 -- 71},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper is concerned with constructions that express probability and their interaction with the indicative and subjunctive mood, as well as with other contextual elements. In detail, the paper deals with the constructions [sin duda + indicative/subjunctive], [tal vez + indicative/subjunctive], [probablemente + indicative/subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative/subjunctive]. In their interaction with mood, the constructions are understood as different microconstructions. For example, [sin duda + indicative] and [sin duda + subjunctive] are seen as different microconstructions of the superordinate mesoconstruction [modal construction (of probability) + verb]. In a qualitative analysis examples from the CREA, CORPES XXI, and CdE corpora are examined regarding the interaction of [expression of probability] + [mood]. Following the Principle of No Synonymy of Grammatical Forms, the analysis confirms that the use of mood additionally influences the expressed degree of probability of the constructions. For instance, while probablemente generally expresses a slightly higher probability than posiblemente, a fine-tuned analysis shows that the expressed degrees of probability of [probablemente + subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative] are highly similar. This is also often confirmed by further contextual information. In summary, the paper shows that Cognitive Construction Grammar is a very suitable background against which to investigate modal phenomena, as cognitive approaches generally deal with the ways in which language users conceptualize the world from their own point of view, and as expressions of modality, more precisely, probability, are also closely related to speakers' attitudes or perspectives.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hennemann2019,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {"I mean, no soy psic{\´o}loga"},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43098},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-430984},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This paper is concerned with the qualitative analysis of the use of the English discourse marker I mean in Spanish and Portuguese online discourses (in online fora, blogs or user comments on websites). The examples are retrieved from the Corpus del Espa{\~n}ol (Web/ Dialects) as well as the Corpus do Portugu{\^e}s (Web/ Dialects).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DoehlaHennemann2019,
  author    = {D{\"o}hla, Hans-J{\"o}rg and Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Zum evidentiellen Gebrauch der Guaran{\´i}-Partikel ndaje in paraguayischen Spanischvariet{\"a}ten},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43028},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-430281},
  pages     = {40},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Der vorliegende Beitrag besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit der durch Sprachkontakt beeinflussten bzw. {\"u}bernommenen Kodierung von Evidentialit{\"a}t im paraguayischen Spanischen. Es geht hierbei insbesondere um den Gebrauch der Guaran{\´i}-Partikel ndaje im paraguayischen Zeitungsspanischen. In diesem Zusammenhang wird der Versuch einer Einordnung des sprachlichen Ph{\"a}nomens vorgenommen und eine qualitative Korpusanalyse durchgef{\"u}hrt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BoehmHennemann2018,
  author    = {B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {The Spanish imperfecto as a construal form for the conceptualization of state of affairs in journalistic texts},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-416094},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This study adopts a cognitive approach to the analysis of the use of the Spanish imperfecto as a construal form for the conceptualization of state of affairs in certain journalistic texts. In doing so, the main focus of the study is to investigate cognitive processes like modalization and subjectivization, which are related to the speaker's standpoint and to his subjective, not grammatically motivated, decision to use the imperfective instead of the perfective form. By the help of the corpus programmes GlossaNet and CREA (corpus of the Real Academia Espa{\~n}ola) we analyze the imperfective use of some Spanish verbs, which are semantically perfective in nature so that the normative use would require a perfective form. In other words, we investigate how the speaker/journalist construes a reality or situation to be expressed by means of the imperfecto and show that this use of the imperfect is typical for journalistic discourse.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hennemann2018,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Evidentiality and (Inter-) Subjectivity as (Non-) Competing Dimensions},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414996},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The present paper discusses the relationship between evidentiality and (inter-) subjectivity and argues that the two semantic-functional categories need not be mutually exclusive. In the use of certain means of expression and in certain contexts, both evidentiality and (inter-) subjectivity may be conveyed simultaneously. I thereby differentiate between two meanings of intersubjectivity, namely 'intersubjectivity1' and 'intersubjectivity2'. Intersubjectivity1 refers to the notion of common or general knowledge: certain means of expression are seen as being intersubjectively used when the speaker shares or assumes sharing knowledge with the interlocutor. Intersubjectivity2 is related to particular discourse functions of certain means of expression in interactional settings, paying attention to the speaker-hearer constellation. In order to substantiate the theoretical part of the paper, I then present a qualitative analysis of Portuguese, Spanish and English examples, which are taken from the Corpus do Portugu{\^e}s, Corpus del Espa{\~n}ol and the Corpus of Contemporary American English.},
  language  = {en}
}