@article{UllrichWeberGronau2023, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Weber, Edzard and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Regionale Refabrikationsnetzwerke}, series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, volume = {39}, journal = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, number = {2}, publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2364-9208}, doi = {10.30844/IM_23-2_11-14}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Die Herstellung von Produkten bindet Energie sowie auch materielle Ressourcen. Viel zu langsam entwickeln sich sowohl das Bewusstsein der Konsumenten sowie der Produzenten als auch gesetzgebende Aktivit{\"a}ten, um zu einem nachhaltigen Umgang mit den zur Verf{\"u}gung stehenden Ressourcen zu gelangen. In diesem Beitrag wird ein lokaler Remanufacturing-Ansatz vorgestellt, der es erm{\"o}glicht, den Ressourcenverbrauch zu reduzieren, lokale Unternehmen zu f{\"o}rdern und effiziente L{\"o}sungen f{\"u}r die regionale Wieder- und Weiterverwendung von G{\"u}tern anzubieten.}, language = {de} } @misc{UllrichWeberGronau2023, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Weber, Edzard and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Regionale Refabrikationsnetzwerke}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {2}, issn = {2364-9208}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-60451}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-604510}, pages = {6}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Die Herstellung von Produkten bindet Energie sowie auch materielle Ressourcen. Viel zu langsam entwickeln sich sowohl das Bewusstsein der Konsumenten sowie der Produzenten als auch gesetzgebende Aktivit{\"a}ten, um zu einem nachhaltigen Umgang mit den zur Verf{\"u}gung stehenden Ressourcen zu gelangen. In diesem Beitrag wird ein lokaler Remanufacturing-Ansatz vorgestellt, der es erm{\"o}glicht, den Ressourcenverbrauch zu reduzieren, lokale Unternehmen zu f{\"o}rdern und effiziente L{\"o}sungen f{\"u}r die regionale Wieder- und Weiterverwendung von G{\"u}tern anzubieten.}, language = {de} } @incollection{GronauWeberWanderetal.2022, author = {Gronau, Norbert and Weber, Edzard and Wander, Paul and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}}, title = {A regional remanufacturing network approach}, series = {Digitization of the work environment for sustainable production}, booktitle = {Digitization of the work environment for sustainable production}, editor = {Plapper, Peter}, publisher = {GITO Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-407-4}, doi = {10.30844/WGAB_2022_8}, pages = {145 -- 170}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Manufacturing companies still have relatively few points of contact with the circular economy. Especially, extending life time of whole products or parts via remanufacturing is an promising approach to reduce waste. However, necessary cost-efficient assessment of the condition of the individual parts is challenging and assessment procedures are technically complex (e.g., scanning and testing procedures). Furthermore, these assessment procedures are usually only available after the disassembly process has been completed. This is where conceptualization, data acquisition and simulation of remanufacturing processes can help. One major constraining aspect of remanufacturing is reducing logistic efforts, since these also have negative external effects on the environment. Thus regionalization is an additional but in the end consequential challenge for remanufacturing. This article aims to fill a gap by providing an regional remanufacturing approach, in particular the design of local remanufacturing chains. Thereby, further focus lies on modeling and simulating alternative courses of action, including feasibility study and eco-nomic assessment.}, language = {en} } @incollection{TeichmannLassUllrichetal.2022, author = {Teichmann, Malte and Lass, Sander and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Modellfabriken als Enabler flexibler Lehr- und Lernsituationen f{\"u}r die Kompetenzentwicklung im Fabrikkontext}, series = {Faktor Mensch}, booktitle = {Faktor Mensch}, editor = {Weber, Kristin and Reinheimer, Stefan}, publisher = {Springer Fachmedien}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-34523-5}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-34524-2_10}, pages = {173 -- 196}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Dieses Kapitel diskutiert die Notwendigkeit einer st{\"a}rkeren Praxisorientierung f{\"u}r die Schaffung konkreter Lehr- und Lernr{\"a}ume in Unternehmen und zeigt die Vorteile einer Lernfabrik vor dem Hintergrund der stattfindenden Digitalisierung als Mittel zur Kompetenzentwicklung auf. Die technologiebedingt erweiterten Weiterbildungsziele erfordern die Nutzung geeigneter Konzepte und L{\"o}sungen. Dahingehend erfolgt die zielorientierte Konkretisierung der Kreation geeigneter Lehr- und Lernsituationen. Die Darstellung der Nutzbarmachung einer Modellfabrik als Lernfabrik der betrieblichen Weiterbildungspraxis zeigt nicht nur eine L{\"o}sung f{\"u}r die intendierte Bereitstellung flexibler Lehr- und Lernsituationen, sondern liefert ebenso Handlungsempfehlungen und Best-Practices f{\"u}r die erfolgreiche Kompetenzentwicklung. Insbesondere Praktiker profitieren von der Darstellung der Lernfabrik: aus dieser k{\"o}nnen sowohl betriebliche Weiterbildner als auch Gesch{\"a}ftsverantwortliche Implikationen f{\"u}r die didaktische Transformation betrieblicher Arbeitsorte in betriebliche Lern-Orte ableiten. Die detaillierte Darstellung einer Tagesschulung zum Thema Auswirkungen von Industrie 4.0 auf die Arbeit der Mitarbeiter sowie Illustration eines Lernszenarios geben reale Einblicke, wie betriebliche Weiterbildung abseits von Lehr-Lern-Kurzschluss-orientierter Didaktik gelingt.}, language = {de} } @article{UllrichVladovaMarquartetal.2022, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Marquart, Danny and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {An overwiew of benefits and risks in open innovation projects and the influence of intermediary participation, decision-making authority, experience, and position on their perception}, series = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM}, volume = {26}, journal = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM}, number = {02}, publisher = {World Scientific Publ.}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {1363-9196}, doi = {10.1142/S1363919622500128}, pages = {41}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper presents an exploratory study investigating the influence of the factors (1) intermediary participation, (2) decision-making authority, (3) position in the enterprise, and (4) experience in open innovation on the perception and assessment of the benefits and risks expected from participating in open innovation projects. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The result of this paper is an empirical evidence showing whether and how these factors affect the perception of potential benefits and risks expected within the context of open innovation project participation. Furthermore, the identified effects are discussed against the theory. Existing theory regarding the benefits and risks of open innovation is expanded by (1) finding that they are perceived mostly independently of the factors, (2) confirming the practical relevance of benefits and risks, and (3) enabling a finer distinction between their degrees of relevance according to respective contextual specifics.}, language = {en} } @article{LewandowskiUllrichGronau2021, author = {Lewandowski, Stefanie and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Normen zur Berechnung des CO₂-Fußabdrucks}, series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, volume = {37}, journal = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, number = {4}, publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {2364-9208}, doi = {10.30844/I40M_21-4_S17-20}, pages = {17 -- 20}, year = {2021}, abstract = {CO₂-Fußabdr{\"u}cke sind ein aktuell viel diskutiertes Thema mit weitreichenden Implikationen f{\"u}r Individuen als auch Unternehmen. Firmen k{\"o}nnen einen proaktiven Beitrag zur Transparenz leisten, indem der unternehmens- oder produktbezogene CO₂-Fußabdruck ausgewiesen wird. Ist der Entschluss gefasst einen CO₂-Fußabdruck auszuweisen und die entstehenden Treibhausgase zu erfassen, existiert eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Normen und Zertifikate, wie die publicly available specification 2050, das Greenhouse Gas Protokoll oder die ISO 14067. Das Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, diese drei Normen zur Berechnung des produktbezogenen CO₂-Fußabdrucks zu vergleichen, um Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede sowie Vor- und Nachteile in der Anwendung aufzuzeigen. Die {\"U}bersicht soll Unternehmen bei der Entscheidungsfindung hinsichtlich der Eignung eines CO₂-Fußabdrucks f{\"u}r ihr Unternehmen unterst{\"u}tzen.}, language = {de} } @article{TeichmannUllrichKotarskietal.2021, author = {Teichmann, Malte and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Kotarski, David and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Facing the demographic change}, series = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, journal = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, publisher = {Social Science Electronic Publ.}, address = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]}, issn = {1556-5068}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.3858716}, pages = {6}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Digitization and demographic change are enormous challenges for companies. Learning factories as innovative learning places can help prepare older employees for the digital change but must be designed and configured based on their specific learning requirements. To date, however, there are no particular recommendations to ensure effective age-appropriate training of bluecollar workers in learning factories. Therefore, based on a literature review, design characteristics and attributes of learning factories and learning requirements of older employees are presented. Furthermore, didactical recommendations for realizing age-appropriate learning designs in learning factories and a conceptualized scenario are outlined by synthesizing the findings.}, language = {en} } @incollection{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Yes, we can (?)}, series = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings}, booktitle = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings}, editor = {Reis, Ars{\´e}nio and Barroso, Jo{\~a}o and Lopes, J. Bernardino and Mikropoulos, Tassos and Fan, Chih-Wen}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-73987-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_17}, pages = {225 -- 235}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The COVID-19 crisis has caused an extreme situation for higher education institutions around the world, where exclusively virtual teaching and learning has become obligatory rather than an additional supporting feature. This has created opportunities to explore the potential and limitations of virtual learning formats. This paper presents four theses on virtual classroom teaching and learning that are discussed critically. We use existing theoretical insights extended by empirical evidence from a survey of more than 850 students on acceptance, expectations, and attitudes regarding the positive and negative aspects of virtual teaching. The survey responses were gathered from students at different universities during the first completely digital semester (Spring-Summer 2020) in Germany. We discuss similarities and differences between the subjects being studied and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teaching and learning. Against the background of existing theory and the gathered data, we emphasize the importance of social interaction, the combination of different learning formats, and thus context-sensitive hybrid learning as the learning form of the future.}, language = {en} } @misc{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Students' Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching - How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52161}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521615}, pages = {17}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020}, series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086}, pages = {15}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.}, language = {en} }