@article{MuellerEngelMuelleretal.2016,
  author    = {Mueller, Juliane and Engel, Tilman and Mueller, Steffen and Kopinski, Stephan and Baur, Heiner and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Neuromuscular response of the trunk to sudden gait disturbances: Forward vs. backward perturbation},
  series = {Journal of electromyography and kinesiology},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Journal of electromyography and kinesiology},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1050-6411},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.07.005},
  pages     = {168 -- 176},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The study aimed to analyse neuromuscular activity of the trunk comparing four different perturbations during gait. Thirteen subjects (28 +/- 3 yrs) walked (1 m/s) on a split-belt treadmill, while 4 (belt) perturbations (F1, F2, B1, B2) were randomly applied. Perturbations differed, related to treadmill belt translation, in direction (forward (F)/backward (B)) and amplitude (20 m/s(2) (1)/40 m/s(2) (2)). Trunk muscle activity was assessed with a 12-lead-EMG. EMG-RMS [\%] (0-200 ms after perturbation; normalized to RMS of normal gait) was analyzed for muscles and four trunk areas (ventral left/right; dorsal left/right). Ratio of ventral: dorsal muscles were calculated. Muscle onset [ms] was determined. Data analysis was conducted descriptively, followed by ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-Kramer (alpha = 0.05)). All perturbations lead to an increase in EMG-RMS (428 +/- 289\%). F1 showed the lowest and F2 the highest increase for the flexors. B2 showed the highest increase for the extensors. Significant differences between perturbations could be observed for 6 muscles, as well as the 4 trunk areas. Ratio analysis revealed no significant differences (range 1.25 (B1) to 1.71 (F2) between stimuli. Muscle response time (ventral: 87.0 +/- 21.7 ms; dorsal: 88.4 +/- 17.0 ms) between stimuli was only significant (p = 0.005) for the dorsal muscles. Magnitude significantly influences neuromuscular trunk response patterns in healthy adults. Regardless of direction ventral muscles always revealed higher relative increase of activity while compensating the walking perturbations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerMuellerEngeletal.2016,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Juliane and M{\"u}ller, Steffen and Engel, Tilman and Reschke, Antje and Baur, Heiner and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Stumbling reactions during perturbed walking: Neuromuscular reflex activity and 3-D kinematics of the trunk - A pilot study},
  series = {Journal of biomechanics},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Journal of biomechanics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0021-9290},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.041},
  pages     = {933 -- 938},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Stumbling led to an increase in ROM, compared to unperturbed gait, in all segments and planes. These increases ranged between 107 +/- 26\% (UTA/rotation) and 262 +/- 132\% (UTS/lateral flexion), significant only in lateral flexion. EMG activity of the trunk was increased during stumbling (abdominal: 665 +/- 283\%; back: 501 +/- 215\%), without significant differences between muscles. Provoked stumbling leads to a measurable effect on the trunk, quantifiable by an increase in ROM and EMG activity, compared to normal walking. Greater abdominal muscle activity and ROM of lateral flexion may indicate a specific compensation pattern occurring during stumbling. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}