@article{BechtoldHogendoornKohutovaetal.2013, author = {Bechtold, Sander and Hogendoorn, Thirza and Koh{\´u}tov{\´a}, Vivien and Potočanov{\´a}, Katar{\´i}na}, title = {Deepening understanding}, series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, journal = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {2194-1599}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-66011}, pages = {105 -- 110}, year = {2013}, abstract = {1. Key concepts 2. What students should have done 3. What students did 4. Deepening understanding 5. General description of deepening understanding 6. Why is deepening understanding an important stage? 7. How does deepening understanding occur in the lessons and some examples 8. Possible difficulties 9. Conclusion}, language = {en} } @article{vandenBeemtCinkayaErdemetal.2012, author = {van den Beemt, Martijn and {\c{C}}inkaya, Muhammed and Erdem, Didem Tuğ{\c{c}}e and Janssen, Robert}, title = {Conclusion for future teaching}, series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, journal = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, number = {1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {2194-1599}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65880}, pages = {99 -- 104}, year = {2012}, abstract = {1. The importance of the maps in the Atlas of European Values 2. Team teaching 3. The importance of discussions in secondary schools 4. Assignments 5. Impact 6. Comments}, language = {en} } @article{ChovanovaGembickyNern2012, author = {Chovanov{\´a}, Katarina and Gembick{\´y}, Kamil and Nern, Luise}, title = {Conclusion for future teaching}, series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, journal = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, number = {1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {2194-1599}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65817}, pages = {59 -- 63}, year = {2012}, abstract = {1. Introduction 2. Questionnaire 3. Using the assignments in the future 4. Helpful experiences for future teaching 5. Value of the project for future job 6. Value of the project for future life 7. Conclusion Appendix}, language = {en} } @article{AltuntaşAkcayKoolsetal.2012, author = {Altunta{\c{s}}, Kezban and Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and Kools, Suzanne and Schnabel, Richard}, title = {Assignments, curriculum framework and background information as the base of developing lessons}, series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, journal = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis}, number = {1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {2194-1599}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65877}, pages = {93 -- 98}, year = {2012}, abstract = {1. What are the general strengths of the assignments? 2. Structure of the assignment 3. Resources of the assignment 4. Fostering self-expression 5. How could you improve the assignment? 6. Lack of specific examples 7. Not relating the issue to the students 8. Language Problems 9. Infeasibility to adaptation 10. In what ways was the additional information useful ? How could this be improved? 11. Was the framework useful for you and in what way? 12. In what ways did the assignments reflect the steps identified in the framework?}, language = {en} }