@article{Klettke1993,
  author    = {Klettke, Cornelia},
  title     = {Bibliographie critique},
  year      = {1993},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2008,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Introduction},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4606-6},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Ette2010,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {The fascination of Humboldt : Humboldtian science as a model for the future},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2011,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Acknowlegements},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4606-6},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KutzinskiEtte2011,
  author    = {Kutzinski, Vera M. and Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Inventories and Inventions: Alexander von Humboldt's Cuban Landscapes},
  isbn      = {978-0-226-46567-8},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EtteMinnes2011,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar and Minnes, M.},
  title     = {Urbanity and literature : cities as transareal spaces of movement in Assia Djebar, Emine Sevgi {\"O}zdamar and Cecile Wajsbrot},
  issn      = {1062-7987},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Ette2011,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Not just brought about by chance : reflections on globalisation in Cornelius de Pauw and Alexander von Humboldt},
  doi       = {10.1080/13645145.2011.537501},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {This essay shows in what sense Alexander von Humboldt created a new discourse on the New World. In his view of the Americas, he was able to subvert the dominantly spatial history of the 'new hemisphere' found in Cornelius de Pauw or Guillaume-Thomas Raynal by introducing dynamic and vectorial structures that allow us to focus on the Americas not as 'the other' but as a highly interrelated part of the world. Humboldt's Weltbewusstsein ('world consciousness') develops a new discourse that can be best understood as a complex answer to the second period of accelerated globalisation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-32394,
  title     = {Political essay on the Island of Cuba : a critical Edition},
  editor    = {Kutzinski, Vera M. and Ette, Ottmar},
  publisher = {The Univ. of Chicago Press},
  address   = {Chicago},
  isbn      = {978-3-0-226-46567-8},
  pages     = {519 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Ette2010,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Literature as knowledge for living, literary studies as science for living},
  issn      = {0030-8129},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-023433-6},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.},
  language  = {en}
}