@misc{Angerer2017,
  author    = {Angerer, Marie-Luise},
  title     = {Moving Forces},
  series = {The minnesota review},
  volume    = {88},
  journal   = {The minnesota review},
  publisher = {Duke Univ. Press},
  address   = {Durham},
  issn      = {0026-5667},
  doi       = {10.1215/00265667-3787414},
  pages     = {83 -- 95},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Throughout a large part of the twentieth century, the body was interpreted as a field of signs, the meaning of which pointed to an unconscious dimension. At the height of the popularity of structuralism, Jacques Lacan deemed the unconscious to be "structured like a language." Starting in the early 1990s, however, a deep shift occurred in the way the body was interpreted. A new movement cast tremendous doubt on the hegemony of language and instead advocated a performative, pictorial, and affective approach — the so-called material turn — which encompassed all of these. In the words of Karen Barad, this turn inquired as to why meaning, history, and truth are assigned to language only, whereas the movements of materiality are given less prominence: "How did language come to be more trustworthy than matter? Why are language and culture granted their own agency and historicity while matter is figured as passive and immutable?" With this shift toward the material, bodies began to be seen in a different light and their materiality understood as something that follows its own laws and movements, which cannot be understood exclusively in terms of social-cultural codes. Instead, these laws and movements call into question the very dichotomies of nature/culture and body/spirit.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{NeubauerWankoSchaubetal.2017,
  author    = {Neubauer, Kai and Wanko, Philipp and Schaub, Torsten H. and Haubelt, Christian},
  title     = {Enhancing symbolic system synthesis through ASPmT with partial assignment evaluation},
  series = {Proceedings of the Design, Automation \& Test in Europe Conference \& Exhibition (DATE), 2017},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the Design, Automation \& Test in Europe Conference \& Exhibition (DATE), 2017},
  publisher = {IEEE},
  address   = {New York},
  isbn      = {978-3-9815370-9-3},
  issn      = {1530-1591},
  doi       = {10.23919/DATE.2017.7927005},
  pages     = {306 -- 309},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The design of embedded systems is becoming continuously more complex such that efficient system-level design methods are becoming crucial. Recently, combined Answer Set Programming (ASP) and Quantifier Free Integer Difference Logic (QF-IDL) solving has been shown to be a promising approach in system synthesis. However, this approach still has several restrictions limiting its applicability. In the paper at hand, we propose a novel ASP modulo Theories (ASPmT) system synthesis approach, which (i) supports more sophisticated system models, (ii) tightly integrates the QF-IDL solving into the ASP solving, and (iii) makes use of partial assignment checking. As a result, more realistic systems are considered and an early exclusion of infeasible solutions improves the entire system synthesis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FitziMarcucciMueller2017,
  author    = {Fitzi, Gregor and Marcucci, Nicola and M{\"u}ller, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Interview by Gregor Fitzi and Nicola Marcucci with Hans-Peter M{\"u}ller on the reception of Emile Durkheim in Germany. Berlin: Humboldt University of Berlin, 25 February 2015},
  series = {Journal of Classical Sociology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Journal of Classical Sociology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1468-795X},
  doi       = {10.1177/1468795X17736132},
  pages     = {399 -- 422},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Just after the publication of the Theory of Communicative Action in 1981, a new generation of interpreters started a different reception of Durkheim in Germany. Hans-Peter M{\"u}ller, sociologist and editor of the German translation of Le{\c{c}}ons de sociologie, reconstructs the history of the German Durkheim's Reception and illuminates the reasons for his interest in the French sociologist. He delivers different insights into the background which permitted the post-Habermasian generation to reach a new understanding of Durkheim's work by enlightening the scientific and political conditions from which this new sensibility emerged.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FitziJoasMarcucci2017,
  author    = {Fitzi, Gregor and Joas, Hans and Marcucci, Nicola},
  title     = {Interview by Gregor Fitzi and Nicola Marcucci with Hans Joas on the reception of Emile Durkheim in Germany. Berlin: Humboldt University of Berlin, 6 October 2014},
  series = {Journal of Classical Sociology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Journal of Classical Sociology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1468-795X},
  doi       = {10.1177/1468795X17736131},
  pages     = {382 -- 398},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The interview offers a reconstruction of the German reception of Durkheim since the middle of the 1970s. Hans Joas, who was one of its major protagonists, discusses the backdrop that finally permitted a scholarly examination of Durkheim's sociology in Germany. Focussing on his personal reception Joas then gives an account of the Durkheimian themes that inspire his work.},
  language  = {en}
}