@incollection{Hassler2022, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Aspectual periphrases in Romance languages in contact with the English progressive form}, series = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, booktitle = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-8253-4936-3}, pages = {215 -- 229}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2022, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Meaning and Function}, series = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies}, volume = {16}, journal = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies}, number = {2}, publisher = {Ştefan cel Mare University Press}, address = {Suceava}, issn = {2065-4057}, pages = {17 -- 50}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu's view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu's difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2019, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Theory of signs and ideas on the relation between language and thought at the border between the 18th and 19th centuries}, series = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura}, volume = {16}, journal = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura}, number = {3}, publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press}, address = {Sankt-Peterburg}, issn = {2541-9358}, doi = {10.21638/spbu09.2019.308}, pages = {463 -- 479}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (id{\´e}ologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac's (1714-1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740-1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Pr{\´e}sentation}, series = {Collocations et traditions discursives Actes du Colloque du Coll{\`e}ge Doctoral Franco-allemand (CDFA) tenu {\`a} l'Universit{\´e} de Potsdam le 4 juillet 2018 (Linx : revue des linguistes de l'Universit{\´e} Paris Ouest Nanterre La D{\´e}fense)}, volume = {2020}, journal = {Collocations et traditions discursives Actes du Colloque du Coll{\`e}ge Doctoral Franco-allemand (CDFA) tenu {\`a} l'Universit{\´e} de Potsdam le 4 juillet 2018 (Linx : revue des linguistes de l'Universit{\´e} Paris Ouest Nanterre La D{\´e}fense)}, number = {13}, editor = {Haßler, Gerda}, issn = {2118-9692}, doi = {10.4000/linx.3842}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {The Functional-Communicative Approach to Language of the Potsdam School in the German Democratic Republic}, series = {History of Humanities}, volume = {5}, journal = {History of Humanities}, number = {1}, publisher = {The University of Chicago Press Journals}, address = {Chicago}, issn = {2379-3163}, pages = {31 -- 49}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Evidential and epistemic sentence adverbs in Romance languages}, series = {Linguistik online}, volume = {92}, journal = {Linguistik online}, number = {5}, issn = {1615-3014}, doi = {10.13092/lo.92.4506}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421822}, pages = {82 -- 98}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, {\´e}videmment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Linguistic relativity and language as epiphenomenon: two contradictory positions}, series = {Conflu{\^e}ncia. Revista do Instituto de l{\´i}ngua portuguesa}, volume = {2018}, journal = {Conflu{\^e}ncia. Revista do Instituto de l{\´i}ngua portuguesa}, number = {55}, issn = {2317-4153}, doi = {10.18364/rc.v0i55}, pages = {82 -- 98}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The assumption of linguistics relativity and the definition of languages as epiphenomena are certainly known as two contradictory positions from the last century. But I will start my discussion of them in the period of their appearance and then use this as a basis to evaluate the heuristic value of these positions in present day linguistics. I will start with the definition of language as an epiphenomenon and then I will go on with the linguistic relativity. The notion of ʽepiphenomenon' is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ʽepiphenomenonʼ, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Arbitrariness, Motivation and Value of the Linguistic Sign: Saussurean and Post-Saussurean Perspectives}, series = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, booktitle = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, editor = {Rico, Christophe and Kirtchuk, Pablo}, publisher = {Polis Institute Press}, address = {Jerusalem}, isbn = {978-9-65769-811-2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {61 -- 87}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since. What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)? In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy. The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself. Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2016, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Deg{\´e}rando's three prize essays and the shift in linguistic thought at the turn of the 19th century}, series = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, booktitle = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Company}, address = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia}, isbn = {978-90-272-4617-2}, issn = {0304-0720}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {149 -- 160}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Deg{\´e}rando started out from the views of the French ideologists on the relationship of language and thought, but increasingly distanced himself from them. This is already evident based on the choice of reference authors and also on the increasing emphasis on empirical research. His prize essays reflect the fundamental changes in linguistic thought during the late 18th century. He was successful in the competition of the Institut National (1797/1799) and with another essay at the Berlin Academy (1802). His main argument against Condillac and the ideologists is that empirical knowledge does not depend on signs. Therefore, the development of better languages will not improve this kind of human knowledge.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2008, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Indicative verb forms as means of expressing modality in romance languages}, isbn = {978-1-443-84059-0}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2012, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Introduction}, isbn = {978-3-89323-140-9}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2008, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Introduction}, isbn = {978-90-272-4606-6}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2011, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Acknowlegements}, isbn = {978-90-272-4606-6}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis}, isbn = {978-3-11-023433-6}, year = {2010}, abstract = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages}, isbn = {978-3-11-022396-5}, year = {2010}, abstract = {In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2007, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Analogy : the history of a concept and a term from the 17th to the 19th century}, isbn = {978-90-272-4603-5}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2007, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Texts of reference and serial texts in the constitution of a notional paradigm : the example of the French ideologues}, isbn = {978-90-272-4601-1}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler1994, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Nerlich, B., Semantic theories in Europe 1830 - 1930; Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1992}, year = {1994}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler1999, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Diversity of human languages and universals of thougth : an eigteenth-century debate in the Berlin Academy}, isbn = {90-272-4583-5}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler1999, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Gambarara, D. (Hrsg.), Language philosophies and the language sciences, a historical perspective in honour of Lia Formigari; M{\"u}nster, Nodus-Publ., 1996}, year = {1999}, language = {en} }