@article{Tiberius2019, author = {Tiberius, Victor}, title = {Scenarios in the strategy process}, series = {European Journal of Futures Research}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Journal of Futures Research}, publisher = {Springer Open}, address = {London}, issn = {2195-4194}, doi = {10.1186/s40309-019-0160-5}, pages = {14}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This paper challenges the solely rational view of the scenario technique as a strategy and foresight tool designed to cope with uncertainty by considering multiple possible future states. The paper employs an affordance-based view that allows for the identification and structuring of hidden, emergent attributes of the scenario technique beyond the intended ones. The suggested framework distinguishes between affordances (1) that are intended by the organization and relate to its goals, (2) that emergently generate organizational benefits, and (3) that do not relate to organizational but individual interests. Also, constraints in the use of scenarios are discussed. Affordance theory's specific lens shows that the emergence of such attributes depends on the users' specific intentions.}, language = {en} } @article{Tiberius2019, author = {Tiberius, Victor}, title = {Scenarios in the strategy process}, series = {European Journal of Futures Research}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Journal of Futures Research}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {2195-2248}, doi = {10.1186/s40309-019-0160-5}, pages = {14}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This paper challenges the solely rational view of the scenario technique as a strategy and foresight tool designed to cope with uncertainty by considering multiple possible future states. The paper employs an affordance-based view that allows for the identification and structuring of hidden, emergent attributes of the scenario technique beyond the intended ones. The suggested framework distinguishes between affordances (1) that are intended by the organization and relate to its goals, (2) that emergently generate organizational benefits, and (3) that do not relate to organizational but individual interests. Also, constraints in the use of scenarios are discussed. Affordance theory's specific lens shows that the emergence of such attributes depends on the users' specific intentions.}, language = {en} } @article{SundelofGrimmUlmestrandetal.2015, author = {Sundelof, Andreas and Grimm, Volker and Ulmestrand, Mats and Fiksen, Oyvind}, title = {Modelling harvesting strategies for the lobster fishery in northern Europe: the importance of protecting egg-bearing females}, series = {Population ecology}, volume = {57}, journal = {Population ecology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Tokyo}, issn = {1438-3896}, doi = {10.1007/s10144-014-0460-3}, pages = {237 -- 251}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @unpublished{WellsteinSchroederEsselbachReinekingetal.2011, author = {Wellstein, Camilla and Schr{\"o}der-Esselbach, Boris and Reineking, Bjoern and Zimmermann, Niklaus E.}, title = {Understanding species and community response to environmental change - A functional trait perspective}, series = {Agriculture, ecosystems \& environment : an international journal for scientific research on the relationship of agriculture and food production to the biosphere}, volume = {145}, journal = {Agriculture, ecosystems \& environment : an international journal for scientific research on the relationship of agriculture and food production to the biosphere}, number = {1}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0167-8809}, doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.024}, pages = {1 -- 4}, year = {2011}, language = {en} }