@misc{Schwarz2005,
  author    = {Schwarz, Siegfried},
  title     = {{\"U}ber franz{\"o}sischen Eigenwillen in der europ{\"a}ischen Politik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48036},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The negative vote of the French population to the European Constitution shocked the European politics. It shifted the power constellations within the Union. By giving historical examples, the author explains that the refusal of the French population is not a new phenomenon. As a result, the article suggests to slow down the European integration process in order to prevent further setbacks.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kleger2010,
  author    = {Kleger, Heinz},
  title     = {{\"U}ber das erfolgreiche Scheitern einer europ{\"a}ischen Verfassung},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62947},
  pages     = {21 -- 41},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: Der Laekener Verfassungsauftrag Der Europ{\"a}ische Konvent als Meilenstein der europ{\"a}ischen Integration Die Ratifizierungskrise Ein Elitenpoker um den Krisenausgang Schlussbemerkungen Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Karolewski2005,
  author    = {Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel},
  title     = {Zwischen Machtstreben und Toleranz : Verfassungsdiskurs in Polen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48045},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The Polish discourse about the European Constitution has one feature in common with the discourses of other member states: it deals with everything but the text of the Constitution Treaty itself. At its core it oscillates between the Polish striving for power in the EU and the toleration for cultural difference in Europe. The opposite of the latter has been particularly significant during the referendum debates in France and the Netherlands, which let to the rejection of the constitutional treaty.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Boeckenfoerde2004,
  author    = {B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Stephan},
  title     = {Wieso der Europapessimismus? : Eine Frage an Gunther Hellmann},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46568},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Huelsse2004,
  author    = {H{\"u}lsse, Rainer},
  title     = {When culture determines politics : wie der Deutsche Bundestag die T{\"u}rkei von der EU fernh{\"a}lt},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9717},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Should Turkey become a member of the EU? This is one of the most controversial issues in German European politics now. While the Social Democrats and the Green Party seem to be in favour, the Christian Democrats strongly oppose it. This paper demonstrates that both sides - their contrary political preferences notwithstanding- share one central belief: Turkey does not fit into the EU for cultural reasons. Through a close reading of parliamentary debates on EUenlargement the article reconstructs how Turkey is made Europe's other.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Franzke2009,
  author    = {Franzke, Jochen},
  title     = {Wertepolitik versus Realpolitik : die Russlandpolitik der Regierung Merkel/Steinmeier},
  issn      = {0944-8101},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32768},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Kooperative Beziehungen zu Russland sind angesichts der politisch-wirtschaftlichen Interessenlage, der geopolitischen Realit{\"a}ten im Osten Europas und des geschichtlichen Hintergrundes in der deutschen politischen Klasse Konsens. Mit dem Begriff der strategischen Partnerschaft werden die deutsch-russischen Beziehungen immer wieder charakterisiert, d. h. diese Kooperation soll weit {\"u}ber die normalen Interessen Deutschlands hinausgehen und eine globalpolitische Dimension erreichen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{BielawskiJurišićLenzetal.2006,
  author    = {Bielawski, Martina and Jurišić, J. and Lenz, T. and Maxian Rusche, T. and Nippert, C.},
  title     = {Via : communis Europa ; Europe's architecture in 2020},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48454},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Forum: EU-Diplomatie im Jahre 2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Koszel2010,
  author    = {Koszel, Bogdan},
  title     = {Verfassung f{\"u}r Europa und Vertrag von Lissabon},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62997},
  pages     = {117 -- 143},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Jorgensen2004,
  author    = {Jorgensen, Knud Erik},
  title     = {Three doctrines on European foreign policy},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46318},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Taking its departure from the debate on the Iraq war, the article examines three so-called „doctrines" on European foreign policy. According to the first one, there is no such thing as an EU foreign policy. This may come as a surprise for policy-makers but is a common view among media commentators, analysts and some diplomats. The second doctrine holds that the EU's foreign policy has been, is, and always will be a failure. Reasons for this gloomy view show considerable variations and are most likely unsustainable in the long run. The third approach is more optimistic, counting on the EU's material volume, yet often ignoring the need to politically cash in if international clout is the quest.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{PedersenJohannsen2004,
  author    = {Pedersen, Karin Hilmer and Johannsen, Lars},
  title     = {The real challenge for change : public administration in new EU member states},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46718},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Executive responsibility for EU policies is by tradition delegated to the member states and their internal administrative bodies. It is therefore of outmost importance that the new Central and East European members have the capacity to administer the acquis communitaire once they are full members of the EU. Based on a survey among current and former top-level decision-makers (ministers), this article argues that although there are significant implementation problems, efficiency gains can be made through administrative reform and not the least education aimed at changing the worldview and knowledge of the individual civil servant. However, there seem to be significant differences in how these countries tackle implementation problems and administrative reform.},
  language  = {en}
}