@article{KrausTraunmuellerKaileretal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Traunm{\"u}ller, Verena and Kailer, Norbert and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The dark triad in entrepreneurship research},
  series = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  number    = {04},
  publisher = {World Scientific},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {0218-4958},
  doi       = {10.1142/S0218495820500156},
  pages     = {353 -- 373},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The impact of traits in entrepreneurship has been subject to intense discussion. Apart from favorable traits fostering opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, venture performance, and other variables, a younger research stream also addresses the role of negative traits. Among them, the dark triad, comprising of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, have gained specific attention. This systematic literature review aims to structure the field, identify current research themes, and provide a better understanding of prior research outcomes. Our results show that dark triad research addresses entrepreneurial activity, opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial leadership, the and entrepreneurial motives. Among the dark triad traits, narcissism is stressed most in research so far. It relates to firm performance, risk, and leadership behavior, whereas Machiavellianism and psychopathy relate to opportunity recognition and exploitation. We also identify several research gaps, which can be addressed in future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchroederTiberiusBounckenetal.2020,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Katharina and Tiberius, Victor and Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Strategic entrepreneurship},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0798},
  pages     = {753 -- 776},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose: Strategic entrepreneurship (SE) depicts the nexus of strategic management and entrepreneurship, suggesting that firms can create superior wealth when simultaneously pursuing advantage-seeking and opportunity-seeking behavior. As the rapid growth in SE research led to a multidisciplinary, scattered and fragmented literature landscape, the authors aim to structure this research field. Design/methodology/approach: The authors employ a bibliographic coupling and literature review of the strategic entrepreneurship research field. Findings: The authors identify and describe five major research streams with 15 sub-themes in recent SE research. Based on our findings, the authors propose an integrated research framework and research gaps for future research. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review on SE based on a bibliographic coupling.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UllrichVladova2016,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andre and Vladova, Gergana},
  title     = {Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation},
  series = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
  publisher = {Carleton University Graphic Services},
  address   = {Ottawa},
  issn      = {1927-0321},
  pages     = {34 -- 40},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The positive aspects of open innovation projects are widely discussed in innovation management research and practice by means of case studies and best practices. However, enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also face miscellaneous challenges in open innovation practice, leading to uncertainty and even renunciation of open innovation project participation. Thus, it is essential for SMEs to find the right balance between possible positive effects and negative consequences - the latter being the less studied "dark sides" of open innovation. However, appropriate methods of finding this balance are still lacking. In this article, we discuss the assessment of open innovation project participation by presenting a weighing and decision process framework as a conceivable solution approach. The framework includes an internal, external, and integrated analysis as well as a recommendation and decision phase. Piece by piece, we investigate the current situation and the innovation goals of the enterprise as an initial point for a decision for or against engaging in open innovation. Furthermore, we discuss the development of a software tool that automatically applies this framework and allows self-assessment by SMEs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CaliendoFossenKritikosetal.2015,
  author    = {Caliendo, Marco and Fossen, Frank M. and Kritikos, Alexander and Wetter, Miriam},
  title     = {The Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: Not just a Matter of Personality},
  series = {CESifo economic studies : a joint initiative of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit{\"a}t and Ifo Institute for Economic Research},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {CESifo economic studies : a joint initiative of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit{\"a}t and Ifo Institute for Economic Research},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1610-241X},
  doi       = {10.1093/cesifo/ifu023},
  pages     = {202 -- 238},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Why do entrepreneurship rates differ so markedly by gender? Using data from a large representative German household panel, we investigate to what extent personality traits, human capital, and the employment history influence the start-up decision and can explain the gender gap in entrepreneurship. Applying a decomposition analysis, we observe that the higher risk aversion among women explains a large share of the entrepreneurial gender gap. We also find an education effect contributing to the gender difference. In contrast, the Big Five model and the current employment state have effects in the opposite direction, meaning that the gender gap in entrepreneurial entry would be even larger if women had the same scores and the same employment status as men. (JEL codes: L26, J16, D81, J24, M13).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FritschKritikosSorgner2015,
  author    = {Fritsch, Michael and Kritikos, Alexander and Sorgner, Alina},
  title     = {Why did self-employment increase so strongly in Germany?},
  series = {Entrepreneurship and regional development},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship and regional development},
  number    = {5-6},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0898-5626},
  doi       = {10.1080/08985626.2015.1048310},
  pages     = {307 -- 333},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Germany experienced a unique rise in the level of self-employment in the first two decades following unification. Applying the nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique, we find that the main factors driving these changes in the overall level of self-employment are demographic developments, the shift towards service sector employment and a larger share of population holding a tertiary degree. While these factors explain most of the development in self-employment with employees and the overall level of self-employment in West Germany, their explanatory power is much lower for the stronger increase in solo self-employment and in self-employment in former socialist East Germany.},
  language  = {en}
}