@phdthesis{Dahlsten2014,
  author    = {Dahlsten, Ulf},
  title     = {World market governance},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70168},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Democratic capitalism or liberal democracy, as the successful marriage of convenience between market liberalism and democracy sometimes is called, is in trouble. The market economy system has become global and there is a growing mismatch with the territoriality of the nation-states. The functional global networks and inter-governmental order can no longer keep pace with the rapid development of the global market economy and regulatory capture is all too common. Concepts like de-globalization, self-regulation, and global government are floated in the debate. The alternatives are analysed and found to be improper, inadequate or plainly impossible. The proposed route is instead to accept that the global market economy has developed into an independent fundamental societal system that needs its own governance. The suggestion is World Market Governance based on the Rule of Law in order to shape the fitness environment for the global market economy and strengthen the nation-states so that they can regain the sovereignty to decide upon the social and cultural conditions in each country. Elements in the proposed Rule of Law are international legislation decided by an Assembly supported by a Council, and an independent Judiciary. Existing international organisations would function as executors. The need for broad sustained demand for regulations in the common interest is identified.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseVosseler2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Vosseler, Christian},
  title     = {Who governs partnershis? on the role board, donors, partners and other stakeholders},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-34413,
  title     = {Transnationale Partnerships : effectively providing for sustainable development?},
  editor    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Leise, Andrea},
  publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
  address   = {Basingstoke},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35952-0},
  pages     = {264 S.},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseJanetscheketal.2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Janetschek, Hannah and Sarre, Johanna},
  title     = {Transnational partnerships: conditions for successful service provision in areas of limited statehood},
  series = {Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0952-1895},
  doi       = {10.1111/gove.12070},
  pages     = {655 -- 673},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Henn2014,
  author    = {Henn, Elisabeth V.},
  title     = {The development of German jurisprudence on individual compensation for victims of armed conflicts the Kunduz case},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqu035},
  pages     = {615 -- 637},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In December 2013, the Court at first instance in Bonn ruled on whether Germany is required to pay compensation to victims of the International Security Assistance Force airstrike ordered by a German colonel in 2009 in Kunduz. Whereas the traditional approach rejects liability of the government for sovereign acts in armed conflicts, the Court held that the rules of German governmental liability (Amtshaftung) do-in principle-apply to illegal sovereign acts in contemporary armed conflicts. However, the Court did not admit the claim on its merits. This judgment can, nonetheless, be placed within the line of questions regarding international relations to be resolved by law and not politics. This article examines the history of German jurisprudence regarding victims' compensation for harm suffered resulting from violations of international humanitarian law. It summarizes and assesses the Kunduz judgment and explains why applying legal liability to the government for sovereign acts in bello is a logical step in the development of the rule of law.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Debre2014,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Debre, Maria},
  title     = {Testing the limits of civil society in Jordan},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-72974},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {iii, 108},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Civil society is either considered as a motor of democratization or stabilizer of authoritarian rule. This dichotomy is partly due to the dominance of domains-based definitions of the concept that reduce civil society to a small range of formally organized, independent and democratically oriented NGOs. Additionally, research often treats civil society as a 'black box' without differentiating between potential variations in impact of different types of civil society actors on existing regime structures. In this thesis, I present an alternative conceptualization of civil society based on the interactions of societal actors to arrive at a more inclusive understanding of the term which is more suited for analysis in non-democratic settings. The operationalization of the action-based approach I develop allows for an empirical assessment of a large range of societal activities that can accordingly be categorized from little to very civil society-like depending on their specific modes of interactions within four dimensions. I employ this operationalization in a qualitative case study including different actors in the authoritarian monarchy of Jordan which suggests that Jordanian societal actors mostly exhibit tolerant and democratically oriented modes of interaction and do not reproduce authoritarian patterns. However, even democratically oriented actors do not necessarily take on an oppositional positions vis-{\`a}-vis the authoritarian regime. Thus, the Jordanian civil society might not feature a high potential to challenge existing power structures in the country.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LieseBeisheim2014,
  author    = {Liese, Andrea Margit and Beisheim, Marianne},
  title     = {Research design : measuring and explaning the effectiveness of PPPs},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KuhlmannGrohsBogumil2014,
  author    = {Kuhlmann, Sabine and Grohs, Stephan and Bogumil, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {Reforming public administration in multilevel systems},
  series = {Public administration and the modern state : assesing trends and impact},
  journal   = {Public administration and the modern state : assesing trends and impact},
  publisher = {Palgrave},
  address   = {New York},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-43748-8},
  pages     = {205 -- 222},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BorckWimbersky2014,
  author    = {Borck, Rainald and Wimbersky, Martin},
  title     = {Political economics of higher education finance},
  series = {Oxford economic papers},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Oxford economic papers},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0030-7653},
  doi       = {10.1093/oep/gps042},
  pages     = {115 -- 139},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Campe2014,
  author    = {Campe, Sabine},
  title     = {Partnerships for water and energy - special focus : knowledge transfer},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}