@article{BrenneckeErtugElfring2023, author = {Brennecke, Julia and Ertug, Gokhan and Elfring, Tom}, title = {Networking fast and slow}, series = {Journal of Management}, journal = {Journal of Management}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {0149-2063}, doi = {10.1177/01492063221132483}, pages = {1 -- 29}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Growing interest in network dynamics has led to insights about patterns of network change, drivers of tie formation, and the temporal unfolding of the consequences of networks. To this area of inquiry, we introduce networking speed—the time that it takes for individuals to form a network tie—as an important but so far largely overlooked aspect. We develop a theory of networking speed that explains how different catalysts enable professionals to introduce variation into the speed with which they form interpersonal network ties. We discuss how such variation in the speed with which ties have been formed influences relational outcomes and the network returns that these ties generate. This discussion illustrates that high networking speed can entail advantages as well as pitfalls. We also explore temporal implications of networking speed—for instance, the persistence of the effects of speed over time. Overall, we conceptualize networking speed as a constitutive element of how interpersonal networks function in professional settings, and we propose a future research program for the integration of this novel concept into organizational network research.}, language = {en} } @article{Assen2023, author = {Assen, Louisa}, title = {Digitalization as a Provider of Sustainability?}, series = {Sustainability}, volume = {15}, journal = {Sustainability}, number = {5}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2071-1050}, doi = {10.3390/su15054621}, pages = {20}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Digitalization, as well as sustainability, are gaining increased relevance and have attracted significant attention in research and practice. However, the research already published about this topic examining digitalization in the retail sector does not consider the acceptance of related innovations, nor their impact on sustainability. Therefore, this article critically analyzes the acceptance of customers towards digital technologies in fashion stores as well as their impact on sustainability in the textile industry. The comprehensive analysis of the literature and the current state of research provide the basis of this paper. Theoretical models, such as the Technology-Acceptance-Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2) enable the evaluation of expectations and acceptance, as well as the assessment of possible inhibitory factors for the subsequent descriptive and statistical examination of the acceptance of digital technologies in fashion stores. The research on this subject was examined in a quantitative way. The key findings show that customers do accept digital technologies in fashion stores. The final part of this contribution describes the innovative Digitalization 4 Sustainability Framework which shows that digital technologies at the point of sale (PoS) in fashion stores could have a positive impact on sustainability. Overall, this paper shows that it is particularly important for fashion stores to concentrate on their individual strengths and customer needs as well as to indicate a more sustainable way by using digital technologies, in order to achieve added value for the customers and to set themselves apart from the competition while designing a more sustainable future. Moreover, fashion stores should make it a point of their honor to harness the power of digitalization for sake of sustainability and economic value creation.}, language = {en} } @misc{Assen2023, author = {Assen, Louisa}, title = {Digitalization as a Provider of Sustainability?}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {155}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58640}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-586408}, pages = {20}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Digitalization, as well as sustainability, are gaining increased relevance and have attracted significant attention in research and practice. However, the research already published about this topic examining digitalization in the retail sector does not consider the acceptance of related innovations, nor their impact on sustainability. Therefore, this article critically analyzes the acceptance of customers towards digital technologies in fashion stores as well as their impact on sustainability in the textile industry. The comprehensive analysis of the literature and the current state of research provide the basis of this paper. Theoretical models, such as the Technology-Acceptance-Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2) enable the evaluation of expectations and acceptance, as well as the assessment of possible inhibitory factors for the subsequent descriptive and statistical examination of the acceptance of digital technologies in fashion stores. The research on this subject was examined in a quantitative way. The key findings show that customers do accept digital technologies in fashion stores. The final part of this contribution describes the innovative Digitalization 4 Sustainability Framework which shows that digital technologies at the point of sale (PoS) in fashion stores could have a positive impact on sustainability. Overall, this paper shows that it is particularly important for fashion stores to concentrate on their individual strengths and customer needs as well as to indicate a more sustainable way by using digital technologies, in order to achieve added value for the customers and to set themselves apart from the competition while designing a more sustainable future. Moreover, fashion stores should make it a point of their honor to harness the power of digitalization for sake of sustainability and economic value creation.}, language = {en} } @article{SchweringSommerUeppingetal.2022, author = {Schwering, Anja and Sommer, Friedrich and Uepping, Florian and Winkelmann, Sandra}, title = {The social-psychological perspective on executive compensation}, series = {Journal of Business Economics}, volume = {92}, journal = {Journal of Business Economics}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.1007/s11573-021-01066-5}, pages = {309 -- 345}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper investigates whether and how social-psychological mechanisms, namely reciprocity, demographic similarity, and similar experiences, affect CEO compensation packages with respect to the levels of total, fixed, and short- and mid-term compensation and the variable proportion of the compensation package. We use evidence from Germany as it is considered a prototype of a two-tier board system. Given the primary roles of both the CEO and the chair of the supervisory board, we especially highlight social-psychological mechanisms in the process leading to the final compensation package. Using a hand-collected sample of non-financial constituents of the German HDAX, we find that reciprocity can lead to a compensation package that is more favorable for the CEO. Results on similarity are ambivalent such that the effects of similarity on CEO compensation—both positive and negative—may depend on the dimension of similarity. Finally, the chair's CEO experience, both inside and outside the focal company, also plays an essential role in shaping CEO compensation. More specifically, CEO experience in general is associated with more favorable compensation. However, having a chair that has been CEO at the focal company correlates with less favorable compensation packages except for when the CEO has also been recruited internally.}, language = {en} } @article{BergerFritschMader2022, author = {Berger, Christian and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie and Mader, Katharina}, title = {Transformation und Krise der Sorgearbeit}, series = {Kurswechsel : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r gesellschafts-, wirtschafts- und umweltpolitische Alternativen}, journal = {Kurswechsel : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r gesellschafts-, wirtschafts- und umweltpolitische Alternativen}, number = {2}, publisher = {BEIGEWUM}, address = {Wien}, issn = {1016-8419}, pages = {40 -- 50}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @periodical{OPUS4-55598, title = {Unterricht Wirtschaft + Politik}, number = {2}, editor = {Kirchner, Vera and Richter, Christin}, publisher = {Friedrich Verlag}, address = {Hannover}, issn = {2191-6624}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Homeoffice, 24/7-Erreichbarkeit, VR-Brillen, flach hierarchisierte Projektarbeit in internationalen Teams - ist das die Arbeitswelt der Zukunft? Sind wir bereit f{\"u}r den Abschied vom B{\"u}roalltag, von Kantine, Allzweckteppich und Philodendron - aber eben auch vom Schwatz mit den Kollegen in der Kaffeepause, von sozialer Anbindung und Mitbestimmung?}, language = {de} } @article{KirchnerRichter2022, author = {Kirchner, Vera and Richter, Christin}, title = {Arbeitswelt 4.0}, series = {Unterricht Wirtschaft + Politik}, journal = {Unterricht Wirtschaft + Politik}, number = {2}, editor = {Kirchner, Vera and Richter, Christin}, publisher = {Friedich Verlag}, address = {Hannover}, issn = {2191-6624}, pages = {6 -- 9}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @misc{KirchnerRemmeleSeeber2022, author = {Kirchner, Vera and Remmele, Bernd and Seeber, G{\"u}nther}, title = {Die Supercells sind knapp - Vom Weltall in den Wirtschaftsunterricht}, series = {Teach economy : Das Portal f{\"u}r den Wirtschaftsunterricht}, journal = {Teach economy : Das Portal f{\"u}r den Wirtschaftsunterricht}, publisher = {Joachim Herz Stiftung}, address = {Hamburg}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{HaenelMueller2022, author = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje Charlotte and M{\"u}ller, Johanna}, title = {Non-Ideal philosophy as methodology}, series = {Theoria : a journal of social and political theory}, volume = {69}, journal = {Theoria : a journal of social and political theory}, number = {3}, publisher = {Berghahn}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1558-5816}, doi = {10.3167/th.2022.6917202}, pages = {32 -- 59}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This article argues that non-ideal theory is distinctive in its use of a certain methodology which is prior to specific topics (such as injustice, oppression, etc.), grounded in the idea of socially situ-ated knowledge, and able to address ideological situatedness. Drawing on standpoint epistemology, we show that one's social position within given power structures has implications for knowledge acquisition and that being in a vulnerable or marginalised position can be advantageous to knowledge acquisition. Following ideology critique, we argue that both marginalised and powerful social positions are embedded within a given ideology. As ideology is more than a mere set of attitudes or beliefs that social agents endorse or resist, situated agents and theo-rists cannot develop normative criteria that are not themselves situated. Hence, non-ideal theory has to be equipped with methods that are likely to make this situatedness visible. We close by presenting some diverse methods that already do so.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{VladovaJenniferStricker2022, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Jennifer, Haase and Stricker, Dennis}, title = {Acceptance in Human-Robot Interaction}, address = {Sydney}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper aims to contribute to exploring the design possibilities of robots for use in human-robot interaction. In an experiment, we investigate the influence of the human's personality and the robot's design, especially its humanization, on its acceptance. We use the Almere model, the Big 5 personality traits, and the anthropomorphic gestalt variants to build the foundation for our investigation. The assumption that an anthropomorphized robot variant would, in principle, be preferred to the standard variant when a natural choice is enforced could not be evidenced in our experiment. This allows for the interpretation that anthropomorphism does not necessarily lead to intentional perception and, consequently, does not guarantee that it can automatically generate acceptance.}, language = {en} }