@incollection{Verwiebe2024,
  author    = {Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Social institutions},
  series = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  booktitle = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  editor    = {Maggino, Filomena},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-17298-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2768},
  pages     = {6598 -- 6600},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Social institutions are a system of behavioral and relationship patterns that are densely interwoven and enduring and function across an entire society. They order and structure the behavior of individuals in core areas of society and thus have a strong impact on the quality of life of individuals. Institutions regulate the following: (a) family and relationship networks carry out social reproduction and socialization; (b) institutions in the realm of education and training ensure the transmission and cultivation of knowledge, abilities, and specialized skills; (c) institutions in the labor market and economy provide for the production and distribution of goods and services; (d) institutions in the realm of law, governance, and politics provide for the maintenance of the social order; (e) while cultural, media, and religious institutions further the development of contexts of meaning, value orientations, and symbolic codes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{HippLeumannSchober2024,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and Leumann, Sandra and Schober, Pia S.},
  title     = {Partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations?},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/ydurp},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals' likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men's and women's occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mackert2024,
  author    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Citizenship},
  series = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  journal   = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  editor    = {Endreß, Martin and Rampp, Benjamin},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-4836-5},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MeischnerAlMousawiHellerHartensteinetal.2024,
  author    = {Meischner-Al-Mousawi, Maja and Heller, Luise and Hartenstein, Sven and Frost, Jonas and Philipp, Aaron and Hinz, Sylvette},
  title     = {Suizide in deutschen Gef{\"a}ngnissen w{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie},
  series = {Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Steinkopff},
  address   = {Darmstadt},
  issn      = {1862-7072},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11757-024-00827-6},
  pages     = {106 -- 116},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Das Risiko, durch einen Suizid im Gef{\"a}ngnis zu versterben, ist erh{\"o}ht. W{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie wurden zum Infektionsschutz zahlreiche Maßnahmen, die beispielsweise eine deutliche Minderung der Kontakt- und Behandlungsangebote zur Folge hatten, eingef{\"u}hrt. Im Rahmen eines Kohortenvergleichs der Suizide und ausgew{\"a}hlter Merkmale der Suizident:innen in den Zeitr{\"a}umen vom April 2017 bis zum Dezember 2019 sowie vom April 2020 bis zum Dezember 2022 wird untersucht, ob es eine Ver{\"a}nderung der Suizide w{\"a}hrend der Pandemie gab. Im Ergebnis zeigen sich eine Zunahme der Suizide w{\"a}hrend der Pandemie, insbesondere in den ersten 14 Tagen der Haft, und eine Zunahme der Suizide von Suizident:innen mit erh{\"o}hter Vulnerabilit{\"a}t. Keine Unterschiede wurden in den allgemeinen Risikomerkmalen f{\"u}r Suizide im Gef{\"a}ngnis festgestellt. Es ergeben sich Hinweise auf eine suizidpr{\"a}ventive Wirkung der Kontakt- und Behandlungsangebote. Daraus ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, intensivere Pr{\"a}ventionsangebote f{\"u}r Gefangene mit erh{\"o}hter Vulnerabilit{\"a}t bzw. geringerer Resilienz anzubieten.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LimSamperMejia2024,
  author    = {Lim, Misun and Samper Mejia, Cristina},
  title     = {Race and cohort differences in family status in the United States},
  series = {Socius : sociological research for a dynamic world},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Socius : sociological research for a dynamic world},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2378-0231},
  doi       = {10.1177/23780231241241041},
  pages     = {1 -- 4},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {In this visualization, the authors show changes in family patterns by different race groups across two cohorts. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (born from 1957 to 1965) and 1997 (born from 1980 to 1984), the authors visualize the relationship-parenthood state distributions at each age between 15 and 35 years by race and cohort. The results suggest the rise of cohabiting mothers and the decline of married and divorced mothers among women born from 1980 to 1984. Black women born from 1980 to 1984 were more likely to experience single/childless and single/parent status compared with Black women born from 1957 to 1965. Although with some visible postponement in the recent cohort, white women in both cohorts were more likely to experience married/parent status than other race groups. The decline in married/parent status across the two generations was sharpest among Hispanic women. These descriptive findings highlight the importance of identifying race when discussing changes in family formation and dissolution trends across generations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StammnitzMuster2024,
  author    = {Stammnitz, Andreas and Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Wenn die Motivation zu stark gef{\"o}rdert wird},
  series = {Changement! : Ver{\"a}nderungsprozesse aktiv gestalten},
  journal   = {Changement! : Ver{\"a}nderungsprozesse aktiv gestalten},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Solutions by Handelsblatt Media Group GmbH},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  issn      = {2510-4926},
  pages     = {50 -- 53},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Um Mitarbeitende langfristig ans Unternehmen zu binden und das Engagement in Teams hochzuhalten, fokussieren sich viele Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Betriebsklimas oder der Zufriedenheit auf die Motivation der Mitarbeitenden. Meist ist es jedoch lohnenswerter, die Zumutungen der organisationalen Struktur zuerst anzufassen. H{\"a}ufig liegen dort die gr{\"o}ßten Motivationskiller - und somit auch die Hebel mit dem gr{\"o}ßten Potenzial f{\"u}r mehr Zufriedenheit.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Muster2024,
  author    = {Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Ein Leitbild entwickeln - ohne Scheu vor Heuchelei},
  series = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Haufe-Lexware GmbH \& Co. KG},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  issn      = {2941-3028},
  pages     = {33 -- 33},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Muster2024,
  author    = {Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Wenn Regeln die Interaktion blockieren},
  series = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Haufe-Lexware GmbH \& Co. KG},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  issn      = {2941-3028},
  pages     = {39 -- 39},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Muster2024,
  author    = {Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Unterwachung lernen},
  series = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Haufe-Lexware GmbH \& Co. KG},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  issn      = {2941-3028},
  pages     = {35 -- 35},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtWellenburg2024,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {French economists and the symbolic power of (post-)national scopes of capital},
  series = {Serendipities : journal for the sociology and history of the social sciences},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Serendipities : journal for the sociology and history of the social sciences},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Karl-Franzens-Universit{\"a}t Graz},
  address   = {Graz},
  issn      = {2521-0947},
  doi       = {10.7146/serendipities.v8i1-2.133990},
  pages     = {77 -- 108},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {The paper argues that economists' position-taking in discourses of crises should be understood in the light of economists' positions in the academic field of economics. This hypothesis is investigated by performing a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) on a prosopographical data set of 144 French economists who positioned themselves between 2008 and 2021 in controversies over the euro crisis, the French political economic model, and French economics. In these disciplinary controversies, different forms of (post-)national academic capital are used by economists to either initiate change or defend the status quo. These strategies are then interpreted as part of more general power struggles over the basic national or post-national constitution and legitimate governance of economy and society.},
  language  = {en}
}