@misc{SchachnerHeHeizmannetal.2017, author = {Schachner, Maja Katharina and He, Jia and Heizmann, Boris and Van de Vijver, Fons J. R.}, title = {Acculturation and School Adjustment of Immigrant Youth in Six European Countries}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-395237}, pages = {11}, year = {2017}, abstract = {School adjustment determines long-term adjustment in society. Yet, immigrant youth do better in some countries than in others. Drawing on acculturation research (Berry, 1997; Ward, 2001) and self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), we investigated indirect effects of adolescent immigrants' acculturation orientations on school adjustment (school-related attitudes, truancy, and mathematics achievement) through school belonging. Analyses were based on data from the Programme for International Student Assessment from six European countries, which were combined into three clusters based on their migrant integration and multicultural policies: Those with the most supportive policies (Belgium and Finland), those with moderately supportive policies (Italy and Portugal), and those with the most unsupportive policies (Denmark and Slovenia). In a multigroup path model, we confirmed most associations. As expected, mainstream orientation predicted higher belonging and better outcomes in all clusters, whereas the added value of students' ethnic orientation was only observed in some clusters. Results are discussed in terms of differences in acculturative climate and policies between countries of settlement.}, language = {en} } @article{SchachnerHeHeizmannetal.2017, author = {Schachner, Maja Katharina and He, Jia and Heizmann, Boris and Van de Vijver, Fons J. R.}, title = {Acculturation and School Adjustment of Immigrant Youth in Six European Countries}, series = {Frontiers in psychology}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00649}, pages = {11}, year = {2017}, abstract = {School adjustment determines long-term adjustment in society. Yet, immigrant youth do better in some countries than in others. Drawing on acculturation research (Berry, 1997; Ward, 2001) and self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), we investigated indirect effects of adolescent immigrants' acculturation orientations on school adjustment (school-related attitudes, truancy, and mathematics achievement) through school belonging. Analyses were based on data from the Programme for International Student Assessment from six European countries, which were combined into three clusters based on their migrant integration and multicultural policies: Those with the most supportive policies (Belgium and Finland), those with moderately supportive policies (Italy and Portugal), and those with the most unsupportive policies (Denmark and Slovenia). In a multigroup path model, we confirmed most associations. As expected, mainstream orientation predicted higher belonging and better outcomes in all clusters, whereas the added value of students' ethnic orientation was only observed in some clusters. Results are discussed in terms of differences in acculturative climate and policies between countries of settlement.}, language = {en} } @article{SchachnerHeHeizmannetal.2017, author = {Schachner, Maja Katharina and He, Jia and Heizmann, Boris and Van de Vijver, Fons J. R.}, title = {Acculturation and School Adjustment of Immigrant Youth in Six European Countries: Findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)}, series = {Frontiers in psychology}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00649}, pages = {11}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @misc{Schachner2017, author = {Schachner, Maja Katharina}, title = {From equality and inclusion to cultural pluralism}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {460}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412589}, pages = {18}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Schools are a major context for academic and socio-emotional development, but also an important acculturative context. This is notably the case in adolescence, which is a critical period for the development of a social and ethnic identity, as well as moral reasoning and intergroup attitudes. How schools approach cultural diversity issues is therefore likely to affect these developmental and acculturative processes and adaptation outcomes. In the present article, the manifestation and effects of the most prominent approaches to cultural diversity, namely those guided by a perspective of equality and inclusion, and those guided by a perspective of cultural pluralism, are reviewed and compared in the context of multi-ethnic schools. The aim is to explore when and how the potential of cultural diversity can best flourish, enhancing the academic and socio-emotional development of culturally diverse students.}, language = {en} } @article{Schachner2017, author = {Schachner, Maja Katharina}, title = {From equality and inclusion to cultural pluralism}, series = {European journal of developmental psychology}, volume = {16}, journal = {European journal of developmental psychology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1740-5629}, doi = {10.1080/17405629.2017.1326378}, pages = {1 -- 17}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Schools are a major context for academic and socio-emotional development, but also an important acculturative context. This is notably the case in adolescence, which is a critical period for the development of a social and ethnic identity, as well as moral reasoning and intergroup attitudes. How schools approach cultural diversity issues is therefore likely to affect these developmental and acculturative processes and adaptation outcomes. In the present article, the manifestation and effects of the most prominent approaches to cultural diversity, namely those guided by a perspective of equality and inclusion, and those guided by a perspective of cultural pluralism, are reviewed and compared in the context of multi-ethnic schools. The aim is to explore when and how the potential of cultural diversity can best flourish, enhancing the academic and socio-emotional development of culturally diverse students.}, language = {en} } @article{SchwarzenthalJuangSchachneretal.2017, author = {Schwarzenthal, Miriam Jelena and Juang, Linda P. and Schachner, Maja Katharina and van de Vijver, Fons J. R. and Handrick, Anna}, title = {From tolerance to understanding}, series = {Journal of community \& applied social psychology}, volume = {27}, journal = {Journal of community \& applied social psychology}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1052-9284}, doi = {10.1002/casp.2317}, pages = {388 -- 399}, year = {2017}, abstract = {We investigated intercultural competence among immigrant and non-immigrant background adolescents in multiethnic schools in relation to intercultural contact, age, and ethnic identity exploration. The sample included 631 adolescents in Germany (49.4\% of immigrant background, 48.2\% female), aged 11 to 18 years (Mage = 13.69 years, SDage = 1.83). Intercultural competence was measured using a self-report questionnaire and situational judgment tests capturing the adolescents' interpretation of and reaction to intercultural conflicts. Intercultural contacts and ethnic identity exploration were measured using self-report questionnaires. Results showed that among immigrant and non-immigrant background adolescents, intercultural contact and ethnic identity exploration were positively related to different aspects of intercultural competence. As predicted, self-reported intercultural competence was unrelated to age in both groups, whereas this competence, as measured by the situational judgment tests, increased with age. Thus, learning about others (e.g., by engaging in intercultural contact) and learning about yourself (e.g., by exploring your own ethnic background) are both important for developing pivotal intercultural skills.}, language = {en} } @article{HeVandeVijverFetvadjievetal.2017, author = {He, Jia and Van de Vijver, Fons J. R. and Fetvadjiev, Velichko H. and Dominguez Espinosa, Alejandra de Carmen and Adams, Byron and Alonso-Arbiol, Itziar and Aydinli-Karakulak, Arzu and Buzea, Carmen and Dimitrova, Radosveta and Fortin, Alvaro and Hapunda, Given and Ma, Sang and Sargautyte, Ruta and Sim, Samantha and Schachner, Maja Katharina and Suryani, Angela and Zeinoun, Pia and Zhang, Rui}, title = {On Enhancing the Cross-Cultural Comparability of Likert-Scale Personality and Value Measures: A Comparison of Common Procedures}, series = {European journal of personality}, volume = {31}, journal = {European journal of personality}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0890-2070}, doi = {10.1002/per.2132}, pages = {642 -- 657}, year = {2017}, abstract = {This study aims to evaluate a number of procedures that have been proposed to enhance cross-cultural comparability of personality and value data. A priori procedures (anchoring vignettes and direct measures of response styles (i.e. acquiescence, extremity, midpoint responding, and social desirability), a posteriori procedures focusing on data transformations prior to analysis (ipsatization and item parcelling), and two data modelling procedures (treating data as continuous vs as ordered categories) were compared using data collected from university students in 16 countries. We found that (i) anchoring vignettes showed lack of invariance, so they were not bias-free; (ii) anchoring vignettes showed higher internal consistencies than raw scores where all other correction procedures, notably ipsatization, showed lower internal consistencies; (iii) in measurement invariance testing, no procedure yielded scalar invariance; anchoring vignettes and item parcelling slightly improved comparability, response style correction did not affect it, and ipsatization resulted in lower comparability; (iv) treating Likert-scale data as categorical resulted in higher levels of comparability; (v) factor scores of scales extracted from different procedures showed similar correlational patterning; and (vi) response style correction was the only procedure that suggested improvement in external validity of country-level conscientiousness. We conclude that, although no procedure resolves all comparability issues, anchoring vignettes, parcelling, and treating data as ordered categories seem promising to alleviate incomparability. We advise caution in uncritically applying any of these procedures. Copyright (c) 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology}, language = {en} } @article{CivitilloSchachnerJuangetal.2017, author = {Civitillo, Sauro and Schachner, Maja Katharina and Juang, Linda P. and van de Vijver, Fons J. R. and Handrick, Anna and Noack, Peter}, title = {Towards a better understanding of cultural diversity approaches at school}, series = {Learning, Culture and Social Interaction}, volume = {12}, journal = {Learning, Culture and Social Interaction}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {2210-6561}, doi = {10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.09.002}, pages = {1 -- 14}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The current study investigates two types of cultural diversity approaches at school, namely (1) fostering equality and (2) promoting cultural pluralism. Adopting a mixed-methods design, this study assesses teachers' (n = 207) and students' (n = 1,644) self-reported perceptions of descriptive norms and evaluates school practices and artefacts in the physical and virtual environment of 22 secondary schools in south-west Germany. Results showed that in all schools under investigation teachers and students perceived descriptive norms fostering mostly equality. A wide variety of practices and artefacts was found, revealing a third distinct cultural approach leaning towards endorsing the majority culture. Different practices and artefacts were linked to an emphasis on equality, cultural pluralism, and endorsing the majority culture. Implications for educational policy, as well as applied diversity research, are discussed.}, language = {en} }