@article{MaleszaSchroederAbe2020,
  author    = {Malesza, Marta and Schr{\"o}der-Ab{\´e}, Michela},
  title     = {The convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of the Discounting Inventory compared to the traditional discounting measures},
  series = {Journal of public health},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Journal of public health},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin ; Heidelberg},
  issn      = {2198-1833},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10389-020-01306-y},
  pages     = {423 -- 433},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Aim The Discounting Inventory was developed to provide researchers and practitioners with a standardized tool to asses individual differences in delay, probabilistic, effort and social discounting, all related to behavioral impulsivity. Convergent and discriminant validity of the Discounting Inventory was evaluated by comparing its associations with external variables to those obtained using standardized discounting measures with the same external variables. Subjects and methods A sample of 347 volunteers was examined. The first questionnaire completed by all participants was the Discounting Inventory. Individuals also completed the traditional discounting measure using pairs of hypothetical choices. The external measures included the Sensation Seeking Scale, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Eysenck Impulsivity Venturesomeness Empathy Questionnaire, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and Temperament and Character Inventory. Results The results revealed that although almost all correlations were significant for both the Discounting Inventory and the traditional discounting measures, most of the correlations between external variables and the Discounting Inventory were significantly higher than those between external variables and traditional discounting measures. However, both discounting measures were most strongly correlated with external measures of impulsivity, which is not surprising given the fact that discounting is seen as a behavioral impulsivity. Finally, most relationships between the Discounting Inventory and external variables were incrementally valid over the traditional discounting measures. Conclusion The Discounting Inventory can help to diagnose problems with behavioral impulsivity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VoehringerSchuetzGessleretal.2020,
  author    = {V{\"o}hringer, Matthias and Sch{\"u}tz, Astrid and Geßler, Sarah and Schr{\"o}der-Ab{\´e}, Michela},
  title     = {SREIS-D},
  series = {Diagnostica},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Diagnostica},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {0012-1924},
  doi       = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000248},
  pages     = {200 -- 210},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Emotionale Intelligenz (EI) ist ein zentraler Pr{\"a}diktor psychischer Gesundheit. Im deutschsprachigen Raum lag bislang keine am Vier-Facetten-Modell der EI orientierte Selbstbeschreibungsskala vor, die an klinischen und nicht-klinischen Gruppen getestet wurde. Die Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale (SREIS) ist mit 19 Items ein {\"o}konomisch einsetzbares Instrument. Die Skala wurde ins Deutsche {\"u}bertragen und psychometrisch {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. Außerdem wurde die SREIS erstmals an einer klinischen Population getestet. Auch werden erstmals differenzierte Ergebnisse zu den vier EI-Facetten vorgelegt. Die Ergebnisse best{\"a}tigen die Faktorenstruktur der englischen Originalskala. Die Reliabilit{\"a}t der Gesamtskala ist als gut einzustufen. Validit{\"a}t wird durch erwartungskonforme Korrelationen mit anderen EI-Maßen sowie klinischen Parametern belegt. Durch Diskriminationsf{\"a}higkeit zwischen klinischer Stichprobe und nicht-klinischer Kontrollgruppe zeigt die Skala zus{\"a}tzlich klinische Relevanz. Skalare Messinvarianz zwischen beiden Gruppen liegt vor. Die SREIS-D ist ein {\"o}konomisch einsetzbares Selbstberichtsmaß zur Erfassung von Facetten der EI im klinischen und subklinischen Bereich.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RudolphSchroederAbeSchuetz2020,
  author    = {Rudolph, Almut and Schr{\"o}der-Ab{\´e}, Michela and Sch{\"u}tz, Astrid},
  title     = {I like myself, I really do (at least right now)},
  series = {European journal of psychological assessment : EJPA},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {European journal of psychological assessment : EJPA},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1015-5759},
  doi       = {10.1027/1015-5759/a000501},
  pages     = {196 -- 206},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In five studies, we evaluated the psychometric properties of a revised German version of the State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES; Heatherton \& Polivy, 1991). In Study 1, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis on the original scale revealed poor model fit and poor construct validity in a student sample that resembled those in the literature; thus, a revised 15-item version was developed (i.e., the SSES-R) and thoroughly validated. Study 2 showed a valid three-factor structure (Performance, Social, and Appearance) and good internal consistency of the SSES-R. Correlations between subscales of trait and state SE empirically supported the scale's construct validity. Temporal stability and intrapersonal sensitivity of the scale to naturally occurring events were investigated in Study 3. Intrapersonat sensitivity of the scale to experimentally induced changes in state SE was uncovered in Study 4 via social feedback (acceptance vs. rejection) and performance feedback (positive vs. negative). In Study 5, the scale's interpersonal sensitivity was confirmed by comparing depressed and healthy individuals. Finally, the usefulness of the SSES-R was demonstrated by assessing SE instability as calculated from repeated measures of state SE.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KratkySchroederAbe2020,
  author    = {Kratky, Nicole and Schr{\"o}der-Ab{\´e}, Michela},
  title     = {A court file analysis of child protection cases},
  series = {Child \& family social work},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Child \& family social work},
  number    = {S1},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1356-7500},
  doi       = {10.1111/cfs.12744},
  pages     = {169 -- 177},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Children's participation in legal proceedings affecting them personally has been gaining importance. So far, a primary research concern has been how children experience their participation in court proceedings. However, little is known about the child's voice itself: Are children able to clearly express their wishes, and if so, what do they say in child protection cases? In this study, we extracted information about children's statements from court file data of 220 child protection cases in Germany. We found 182 children were asked about their wishes. The majority of the statements found came either from reports of the guardians ad litem or from judicial records of the child hearings. Using content analysis, three main aspects of the statements were extracted: wishes concerning main place of residence, wishes about whom to have or not contact with, and children granting decision-making authority to someone else. Children's main focus was on their parents, but others (e.g., relatives and foster care providers) were also mentioned. Intercoder agreement was substantial. Making sure that child hearings are as informative as possible is in the child's best interest. Therefore, the categories developed herein might help professionals to ask questions more precisely relevant to the child.},
  language  = {en}
}