@article{BalderjahnPeyerPaulssen2013,
  author    = {Balderjahn, Ingo and Peyer, Mathias and Paulssen, Marcel},
  title     = {Consciousness for fair consumption - conceptualization, scale development and empirical validation},
  series = {International journal of consumer studies},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {International journal of consumer studies},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1470-6423},
  doi       = {10.1111/ijcs.12030},
  pages     = {546 -- 555},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Sustainable consumption means that consumers act in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. Compared with the vast amount of studies concerning environmentally conscious consumer behaviour, relatively little is known about socially conscious consumption. The present paper focuses on fair consumption as an important aspect of social consumption. In our study, consciousness for fair consumption (CFC) is defined as a latent disposition of consumers to prefer products that are produced and traded in compliance with fair labour and business practices. A scale to measure CFC was conceptualized and tested in three independent empirical studies. Two studies were conducted at European universities (2010 and 2012) and used 352 and 362 undergraduate business students respectively. The third study, conducted in 2011, used 141 employees at a European university. The results confirmed the reliability and validity of the new CFC scale across samples. While being moderately related to other aspects of sustainable consumption such as ecological concern and moral reasoning, CFC was significantly distinct from those concepts. Most importantly, it was established that the CFC, as measured by the new CFC scale, is a strong determinant of consumption of fair trade products that has been neglected in existing research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuschallaFayHoffmann2016,
  author    = {Muschalla, Beate and Fay, Doris and Hoffmann, Karin},
  title     = {Inventory for Job Coping and Return Intention (JoCoRi)},
  series = {Diagnostica},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Diagnostica},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {0012-1924},
  doi       = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000146},
  pages     = {143 -- 156},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Ein großer Anteil der Erwerbst{\"a}tigen ist aufgrund gesundheitlicher Einschr{\"a}nkungen einmalig oder mehrfach in seiner Berufsbiografie l{\"a}ngere Zeit arbeitsunf{\"a}hig. Auf Grundlage etablierter psychologischer Konstrukte und empirischer Befunde wurde ein spezifisch arbeitsbezogenes Inventar f{\"u}r Job-Coping und R{\"u}ckkehrintention (JoCoRi) entwickelt. Der Selbsteinsch{\"a}tzungsfragebogen wurde an drei unabh{\"a}ngigen Stichproben (N = 243, N = 337, N = 111) von Rehabilitationspatienten aus Psychosomatik, Orthop{\"a}die, Kardiologie und Neurologie gepr{\"u}ft. Faktorenanalytische Ergebnisse der ersten Stichprobe best{\"a}tigen eine mehrfaktorielle Struktur. Das Inventar enth{\"a}lt 30 Items in 7 Skalen: 1. Arbeitsbezogene R{\"u}ckkehrintention und -planung, 2. Arbeitsbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, 3. Arbeitsbezogene Selbstberuhigung und Selbstinstruktion, 4. Arbeitsbezogene externale Kontroll{\"u}berzeugung, 5. Aktives Coping am Arbeitsplatz, 6. Bedeutung der Arbeit, 7. Kontroll{\"u}berzeugung bzgl. der Arbeitsaufnahme. Die Varianzaufkl{\"a}rung liegt bei 68 \%. 25 Items haben Hauptladungen > .60. Interne Konsistenzen und Trennsch{\"a}rfen sind {\"u}berwiegend zufriedenstellend. Die Modellg{\"u}te der konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalyse ist {\"u}berzeugend. Das Modell ist in einer unabh{\"a}ngigen Stichprobe stabil (N = 337). Die Skalen wurden mit inhaltlich analogen Globalkonstrukten validiert. Die mehrfaktorielle Struktur kann in der zweiten Stichprobe repliziert werden. Eine l{\"a}ngsschnittliche Analyse der dritten Stichprobe pr{\"u}ft die pr{\"a}diktive Validit{\"a}t der R{\"u}ckkehrintentionsskala; sie wird hinsichtlich Arbeitsunf{\"a}higkeitsdauer und Arbeitsf{\"a}higkeitsstatus best{\"a}tigt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{JuangShenKimetal.2016,
  author    = {Juang, Linda P. and Shen, Yishan and Kim, Su Yeong and Wang, Yijie},
  title     = {Development of an Asian American Parental Racial-Ethnic Socialization Scale},
  series = {Learning and individual differences},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Learning and individual differences},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {1099-9809},
  doi       = {10.1037/cdp0000083},
  pages     = {417 -- 431},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objective: To develop a measure of parental racial-ethnic socialization that is appropriate for Asian American families. Method: To test the reliability and validity of this new measure, we surveyed 575 Asian American emerging adults (49\% female, 79\% U.S. born). Results: Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the results show 7 reliable subscales: maintenance of heritage culture, becoming American, awareness of discrimination, avoidance of other groups, minimization of race, promotion of equality, and cultural pluralism. Tests of factorial invariance show that overall, the subscales demonstrate, at minimum, partial metric invariance across gender, age, nativity, educational attainment, parent educational attainment, geographic region of residence, and Asian-heritage region. Thus, the relations among the subscales with other variables can be compared across these different subgroups. The subscales also correlated with ethnic identity, ethnic centrality, perceptions of discrimination, and pluralistic orientation, demonstrating construct validity. Conclusion: In an increasingly complex and diverse social world, our scale will be useful for gaining a better understanding of how Asian American parents socialize their children regarding issues of race, discrimination, culture, and diversity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KawasakiAkamatsuOmorietal.2020,
  author    = {Kawasaki, Yui and Akamatsu, Rie and Omori, Mika and Sugawara, Masumi and Yamazaki, Yoko and Matsumoto, Satoko and Fujiwara, Yoko and Iwakabe, Shigeru and Kobayashi, Tetsuyuki},
  title     = {Development and validation of the Expanded Mindful Eating Scale},
  series = {International journal of health care quality assurance},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {International journal of health care quality assurance},
  number    = {4-5},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0952-6862},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2020-0009},
  pages     = {309 -- 321},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose To develop and validate the Expanded Mindful Eating Scale (EMES), an expanded mindful eating model created for the promotion of health and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaire surveys on Ochanomizu Health Study (OHS) was conducted. The survey was provided to 1,388 female university students in Tokyo, Japan. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and a partial correlation analysis were used to confirm construct and criterion validity. Internal consistency of the EMES was confirmed to calculate Cronbach's alpha. Findings The response rate was 38.7 \% (n = 537). Mean BMI was 20.21 +/- 2.12, and 18.8\% of them were classified as "lean" (BMI < 18.5). The authors listed 25 items and obtained a final factor structure of five factors and 20 items, as a result of EFA. Through CFA, the authors obtained the following fit indices for a final model: GFI = 0.914, AGFI = 0.890, CFI = 0.870 and RMSEA = 0.061. The total EMES score was significantly correlated with BMI, mindfulness, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness and life satisfaction (r = -0.138, -0.315, -0.339, -0.281 and 0.149,p < 0.01, respectively). Cronbach's alpha for all items in this scale was 0.687. Practical implications The authors suggest the possibility that practitioners and researchers of mindful eating that includes this new concept can use authors' novel scale as an effective measurement tool. Originality/value The EMES, which can multidimensionally measure the concept of the expanded model of mindful eating was first developed in this study.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Fischer2020,
  author    = {Fischer, Caroline},
  title     = {Knowledge Sharing in the Public Sector},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xiii, 222},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This dissertation examines the activity of knowledge sharing by public employees in the workplace. Building on the Rubicon model of human behavior formation, I use a threefold approach to analyze the knowledge-sharing process: public employees' motivation to share knowledge, their intention to share, and knowledge sharing behavior as such. The first article maps the knowledge-sharing behavior of public employees. It builds a typology of behavioral patterns and shows that public employees mainly share their knowledge responsively and directly with a knowledge receiver rather than an information medium. The second article elaborates on the construct of knowledge-sharing motivation and develops a scale to measure this kind of work motivation in a selective and domain-specific way. Data from three studies indicate three dimensions of knowledge-sharing motivation, namely appreciation, growth and altruism, and tangible rewards. Based on these dimensions, the third article analyzes whether the satisfaction of public employees' underlying needs can foster ther knowledge-sharing intention. The study indicates that both tested treatments (appreciation by co-workers, benefits in a performance appraisal) positively affect knowledge-sharing intention if it is explicit knowledge that ought to be shared. However, no effects of either treatment can be found if implicit knowledge is shared. Hence, to foster sharing of explicit knowledge, the analyzed motivation-enhancing rewards can be used in public management practice. To enhance implicit knowledge sharing, ability- and opportunity-enhancing management instruments are discussed. All in all, this dissertation integrates a micro-level perspective on human knowledge sharing into a meso-level perspective on organizational knowledge management. It adds to the literature on workplace behaviors of public employees and knowledge management and aims to incorporate knowledge sharing and management into the public administration and management literature.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SeewannVerwiebe2020,
  author    = {Seewann, Lena and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {How do people interpret the value concept?},
  series = {Journal of beliefs and values},
  volume    = {41},
  journal   = {Journal of beliefs and values},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1469-9362},
  doi       = {10.1080/13617672.2019.1707748},
  pages     = {419 -- 432},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Value research has a long and extensive history of theoretical definitions and empirical investigations using large scale quantitative surveys. However, the way the general population understands, defines, and relates to the concept of values, and how these views vary across individuals is seldom addressed. The present study examined subjective interpretations of the term through focus group interviews, and reports on the development of a Value Conceptualisation Scale (VCS) that distinguishes six dimensions of different views on values: normativity, relevance, validity, stability, consistency, and awareness. Focus group interviews (n = 38) as well as several surveys (n = 100, n = 1519, n = 903, n = 94) were used to develop, refine, and test the scale in terms of response variety, temporal stability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. These systematic results show that views on values do indeed vary significantly between participants. Correlations with dogmatism, preference for consistency, and metacognition were found for corresponding dimensions. The VCS provides an original measure, which enables future research to explore this variation on the conceptualisation of values.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{SeewannVerwiebe2020,
  author    = {Seewann, Lena and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {How do people interpret the value concept?},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51584},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-515843},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Value research has a long and extensive history of theoretical definitions and empirical investigations using large scale quantitative surveys. However, the way the general population understands, defines, and relates to the concept of values, and how these views vary across individuals is seldom addressed. The present study examined subjective interpretations of the term through focus group interviews, and reports on the development of a Value Conceptualisation Scale (VCS) that distinguishes six dimensions of different views on values: normativity, relevance, validity, stability, consistency, and awareness. Focus group interviews (n = 38) as well as several surveys (n = 100, n = 1519, n = 903, n = 94) were used to develop, refine, and test the scale in terms of response variety, temporal stability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. These systematic results show that views on values do indeed vary significantly between participants. Correlations with dogmatism, preference for consistency, and metacognition were found for corresponding dimensions. The VCS provides an original measure, which enables future research to explore this variation on the conceptualisation of values.},
  language  = {en}
}