@article{SpoererLenkeitBosseetal.2020, author = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel}, title = {Students' perspective on inclusion}, series = {International journal of educational research}, volume = {103}, journal = {International journal of educational research}, publisher = {Elsevier Science}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0883-0355}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101641}, pages = {13}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The goal of the present study was to analyze how students' attitudes towards inclusive education develop over the course of a school year and how these attitudes relate to students' peer relations. Sixth- and seventh-graders of 44 inclusive classes filled out a questionnaire at two measurement points within one school year to assess attitudes towards inclusive education and peer relations. Applying multilevel regression analyses it turned out that changes in peer relations over time were positively predicted by students' attitudes towards instructional adaptations for students with behaviour difficulties. Further, students with self-perceived behavior difficulties reported lower scores for peer relations compared to students without self-perceived difficulties. Results are discussed with respect to structural factors and individual characteristics affecting inclusive education.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchindlerWolff2015, author = {Schindler, Sebastian and Wolff, Wanja}, title = {Cerebral correlates of automatic associations towards performance enhancing substances}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {421}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-406279}, pages = {9}, year = {2015}, abstract = {kein abstract vorh.}, language = {en} } @misc{Justiz2023, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Justiz, Pia}, title = {Der Zusammenhang von Einstellungs{\"a}nderungen zum gemeinsamen Lernen und den Selbstwirksamkeits{\"a}nderungen von Kindern mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61161}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-611614}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {ii, 61}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Der gemeinsame Unterricht im Land Brandenburg ist bestrebt, Schule inklusiv zu gestalten, um alle Sch{\"u}ler:innen individuell bestm{\"o}glich zu f{\"o}rdern. Die Perspektive der Kinder mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf auf den gemeinsamen Unterricht wurde bislang nur selten erhoben, h{\"a}ufig sind Sch{\"u}ler:innen mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf eher Gegenstand der Untersuchungen. Mithilfe der Daten von N = 181 Viert- und F{\"u}nftkl{\"a}ssler:innen sollten die Fragen beantwortet werden, wie sich Kinder mit (n = 61) und ohne (n = 120) Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf bez{\"u}glich der Einstellungen zum gemeinsamen Lernen unterscheiden, wie sich ihre allgemeine sowie gruppenspezifische Selbstwirksamkeit unterscheidet und ver{\"a}ndert, wenn durch die Intervention „Soziale Entwicklung beim gemeinsamen Lernen" eine Einstellungsverbesserung erreicht wurde. Dabei wurden die Kinder mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf nach den Gruppen Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf emotionale und soziale Entwicklung (n = 28) sowie Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarfen Lernen und Sprache (n = 32) unterschieden, um eine differenzierte Darstellung zu erreichen. Der Vergleich der Mittelwertsunterschiede zwischen den Gruppen ergab signifikante Unterschiede in der allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeit zugunsten der Kinder ohne Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf. Der Vergleich der Mittelwertsunterschiede zu den Messzeitpunkten vor und nach der Intervention ergab eine signifikante Verbesserung der Einstellungen von Kindern mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf, wobei sich durch eine Regressionsanalyse zeigte, dass diese keinen Einfluss auf die Selbstwirksamkeit der Sch{\"u}ler:innen hatte. Dennoch zeigt die vorliegende Arbeit auf, dass der gemeinsame Unterricht aus Sch{\"u}ler:innenperspektive differenzierter untersucht werden muss und die personalen Kompetenzen von Kindern mit Unterst{\"u}tzungsbedarf gest{\"a}rkt werden m{\"u}ssen.}, language = {de} } @misc{John2014, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {John, Linda}, title = {Sprachliche und soziale Normen : quantitative Studie zum Einfluss von Abweichungen des sprachlichen Standards und ethnisch markierten Vornamen bei der Leistungsbewertung von Schulaufs{\"a}tzen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71907}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Masterarbeit hat in einer Einstellungsstudie untersucht, welchen Einfluss Einstellungen gegen{\"u}ber sprachlichen Variet{\"a}ten und gegen{\"u}ber der wahrgenommenen ethnischen Herkunft von Sprecher*innen auf die Leistungsbewertung von Schulaufs{\"a}tzen haben. In Anlehnung an die Debatte um Sprachideologien wurden Einstellungen gegen{\"u}ber den sprachlichen Variet{\"a}ten Kiezdeutsch und dominantes Deutsch sowie, aufbauend auf Studien zur Wahrnehmung von sozialer Information {\"u}ber Sprecher*innen, Einstellungen gegen{\"u}ber t{\"u}rkisch und deutsch markierten Vornamen miteinander verglichen. 157 Lehramtsstudierenden der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wurde je ein fiktiver Schulaufsatz vorgelegt, der die jeweiligen Einstellungsobjekte sprachliche Variet{\"a}t und ethnisch markierter Vorname enthielt. Durch einen Vergleich der individuellen Leistungsbewertung der Aufs{\"a}tze wurde untersucht, welche Unterschiede sich im schulischen Kontext in der Bewertung und damit der Einstellung gegen{\"u}ber bestimmten Sprecher*innen und ihrem Sprachgebrauch feststellen ließen. Die Studie ergab, dass in den fiktiven Schulaufs{\"a}tzen Kiezdeutsch st{\"a}rker sanktioniert wurde als dominantes Deutsch. Dieses Ergebnis konnte verst{\"a}rkt beobachtet werden, wenn der Schulaufsatz vermeintlich von einer*m Sprecher*in mit t{\"u}rkisch markiertem Vornamen stammte. Die Ergebnisse der Studie lassen vermuten, dass eine Bewertung von Sch{\"u}ler*innen von einer Vorstellung dar{\"u}ber abh{\"a}ngt, wie weit oder nah entfernt der oder die betreffende Sch{\"u}ler*in zur sprachlichen und sozialen Norm steht.}, language = {de} } @article{HanKuhlicke2019, author = {Han, Sungju and Kuhlicke, Christian}, title = {Reducing Hydro-Meteorological Risk by Nature-Based Solutions: What Do We}, series = {Water}, volume = {11}, journal = {Water}, number = {12}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2073-4441}, doi = {10.3390/w11122599}, pages = {23}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Nature-based solutions (NBS) have recently received attention due to their potential ability to sustainably reduce hydro-meteorological risks, providing co-benefits for both ecosystems and affected people. Therefore, pioneering research has dedicated efforts to optimize the design of NBS, to evaluate their wider co-benefits and to understand promoting and/or hampering governance conditions for the uptake of NBS. In this article, we aim to complement this research by conducting a comprehensive literature review of factors shaping people's perceptions of NBS as a means to reduce hydro-meteorological risks. Based on 102 studies, we identified six topics shaping the current discussion in this field of research: (1) valuation of the co-benefits (including those related to ecosystems and society); (2) evaluation of risk reduction efficacy; (3) stakeholder participation; (4) socio-economic and location-specific conditions; (5) environmental attitude, and (6) uncertainty. Our analysis reveals that concerned empirical insights are diverse and even contradictory, they vary in the depth of the insights generated and are often not comparable for a lack of a sound theoretical-methodological grounding. We, therefore, propose a conceptual model outlining avenues for future research by indicating potential inter-linkages between constructs underlying perceptions of NBS to hydro-meteorological risks.}, language = {en} } @article{BoernertRinglebWestphalZarubaetal.2020, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Westphal, Andrea and Zaruba, Nicole and Gutmann, Franziska and Vock, Miriam}, title = {The relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and subsequent automatic evaluations amongst student teachers}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.584464}, pages = {11}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Teachers' attitudes toward inclusion are frequently cited as being an important predictor of how successfully a given inclusive school system is implemented. At the same time, beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning are discussed as a possible predictor of attitudes toward inclusion. However, more recent research emphasizes the need of considering implicit processes, such as automatic evaluations, when describing attitudes and beliefs. Previous evidence on the association of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning is solely based on explicit reports. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and the subsequent automatic evaluations of pre-service teachers (N = 197). The results revealed differences between pre-service teachers' explicit attitudes/beliefs and their subsequent automatic evaluations. Differences in the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning occur when teachers focus either on explicit measures or automatic evaluations. These differences might be due to different facets of the same attitude object being represented. Relying solely on either explicit measures or automatic evaluations at the exclusion of the other might lead to erroneous assumptions about the relation of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning.}, language = {en} } @article{BrandSchweizer2015, author = {Brand, Ralf and Schweizer, Geoffrey}, title = {Going to the Gym or to the Movies?: Situated Decisions as a Functional Link Connecting Automatic and Reflective Evaluations of Exercise With Exercising Behavior}, series = {Journal of sport \& exercise psychology}, volume = {37}, journal = {Journal of sport \& exercise psychology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Human Kinetics Publ.}, address = {Champaign}, issn = {0895-2779}, doi = {10.1123/jsep.2014-0018}, pages = {63 -- 73}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The goal of the present paper is to propose a model for the study of automatic cognition and affect in exercise. We have chosen a dual-system approach to social information processing to investigate the hypothesis that situated decisions between behavioral alternatives form a functional link between automatic and reflective evaluations and the time spent on exercise. A new questionnaire is introduced to operationalize this link. A reaction-time based evaluative priming task was used to test participants' automatic evaluations. Affective and cognitive reflective evaluations, as well as exercising time, were requested via self-report. Path analyses suggest that the affective reflective (beta =.71) and the automatic evaluation (beta =.15) independently explain situated decisions, which, in turn (beta =.60) explain time spent on exercise. Our findings highlight the concept of contextualized decisions. They can serve as a starting point from which the so far seldom investigations of automatic cognition and affect in exercise can be integrated with multitudinous results from studies on reflective psychological determinants of health behavior.}, language = {en} } @misc{ArniCaliendoKuennetal.2014, author = {Arni, Patrick and Caliendo, Marco and K{\"u}nn, Steffen and Zimmermann, Klaus F.}, title = {The IZA evaluation dataset survey}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {122}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43520}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435204}, pages = {22}, year = {2014}, abstract = {This reference paper describes the sampling and contents of the IZA Evaluation Dataset Survey and outlines its vast potential for research in labor economics. The data have been part of a unique IZA project to connect administrative data from the German Federal Employment Agency with innovative survey data to study the out-mobility of individuals to work. This study makes the survey available to the research community as a Scientific Use File by explaining the development, structure, and access to the data. Furthermore, it also summarizes previous findings with the survey data.}, language = {en} }