@article{HeldtDoerfler2021,
  author    = {Heldt, Eugenia C. and D{\"o}rfler, Thomas},
  title     = {Orchestrating private investors for development},
  series = {Regulation \& governance},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Regulation \& governance},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken, NJ},
  issn      = {1748-5983},
  doi       = {10.1111/rego.12432},
  pages     = {1382 -- 1398},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Confronted with a new wave of criticism on the in effectiveness of its development programs, the World Bank embarked on a revitalization process, turning to private investors to finance International Development Association projects and widening its mandate. To explain these adaptation strategies of the World Bank to regain relevance, this piece draws on organizational ecology and orchestration scholarship. We contend that international organizations rely on two adaptation mechanisms, orchestration and scope expansion, when they lose their role as focal actors in an issue area. We find that the World Bank has indeed lost market share and has relied on these two mechanisms to revitalize itself. We show that the World Bank responded to changes in the environment by orchestrating a private sector-oriented capital increase, prioritizing private funding for development through a "cascade approach," and expanding the scope of its mandate into adjacent domains of transnational governance, including climate change and global health.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TiberiusHoffmeisterWeyland2021,
  author    = {Tiberius, Victor and Hoffmeister, Leonie and Weyland, Michael},
  title     = {Prospective shifts in executive education},
  series = {The international journal of management education},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {The international journal of management education},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1472-8117},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100514},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Executive education (EE) has been an established means for management education. However, due to the ever-changing business environment, progress in education technology, and new competitors, EE has been continuously evolving and can be expected to further change. Employing a three-stage international Delphi study, we identify a plausible scenario for the further development of EE over the next decade. The results suggest major changes for management training. The panel expects major shifts in teaching methods and curricula construction. Business schools are expected to increase content customization, to adapt delivery formats, and to enhance coverage of topical issues to better respond to leaders' needs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LangusHoehle2021,
  author    = {Langus, Alan and H{\"o}hle, Barbara},
  title     = {Object individuation and labelling in 6-month-old infants},
  series = {Infant behavior \& development},
  volume    = {65},
  journal   = {Infant behavior \& development},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0163-6383},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101627},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The ability to determine how many objects are involved in physical events is fundamental for reasoning about the world that surrounds us. Previous studies suggest that infants can fail to individuate objects in ambiguous occlusion events until their first birthday and that learning words for the objects may play a crucial role in the development of this ability. The present eye-tracking study tested whether the classical object individuation experiments underestimate young infants' ability to individuate objects and the role word learning plays in this process. Three groups of 6-month-old infants (N = 72) saw two opaque boxes side by side on the eye-tracker screen so that the content of the boxes was not visible. During a familiarization phase, two visually identical objects emerged sequentially from one box and two visually different objects from the other box. For one group of infants the familiarization was silent (Visual Only condition). For a second group of infants the objects were accompanied with nonsense words so that objects' shape and linguistic labels indicated the same number of objects in the two boxes (Visual \& Language condition). For the third group of infants, objects' shape and linguistic labels were in conflict (Visual vs. Language condition). Following the familiarization, it was revealed that both boxes contained the same number of objects (e.g. one or two). In the Visual Only condition, infants looked longer to the box with incorrect number of objects at test, showing that they could individuate objects using visual cues alone. In the Visual \& Language condition infants showed the same looking pattern. However, in the Visual vs Language condition infants looked longer to the box with incorrect number of objects according to linguistic labels. The results show that infants can individuate objects in a complex object individuation paradigm considerably earlier than previously thought and that linguistic cues enforce their own preference in object individuation. The results are consistent with the idea that when language and visual information are in conflict, language can exert an influence on how young infants reason about the visual world.},
  language  = {en}
}