@misc{Handl2004,
  author    = {Handl, Vladimir},
  title     = {„Machtpolitische" oder „nationalstaatliche Resozialisierung" Deutschlands?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47456},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Berger2004,
  author    = {Berger, Thomas},
  title     = {„Back to the Future" : German style},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47434},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Huelsse2004,
  author    = {H{\"u}lsse, Rainer},
  title     = {When culture determines politics : wie der Deutsche Bundestag die T{\"u}rkei von der EU fernh{\"a}lt},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9717},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Should Turkey become a member of the EU? This is one of the most controversial issues in German European politics now. While the Social Democrats and the Green Party seem to be in favour, the Christian Democrats strongly oppose it. This paper demonstrates that both sides - their contrary political preferences notwithstanding- share one central belief: Turkey does not fit into the EU for cultural reasons. Through a close reading of parliamentary debates on EUenlargement the article reconstructs how Turkey is made Europe's other.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Muetzenich2005,
  author    = {M{\"u}tzenich, Rolf},
  title     = {Wandel und Kontinuit{\"a}ten deutscher Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9722},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {In the spring 2004 issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a "realpolitik" policy, generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann, this transformation indicates one of the "deepest crisis of Germany's foreign policy" ever. The first three parts were published in the summer, fall and winter editions (no. 43, 44 and 45) of WeltTrends, which featured contributions of German International Relations scholars as well as experts from abroad. In this issue, foreign policy makers and a Polish expert join the debate.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{deGuevara2016,
  author    = {de Guevara, Berit Bliesemann},
  title     = {visits in zones of conflict and intervention},
  series = {Journal of intervention and statebuilding},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of intervention and statebuilding},
  publisher = {Soil Science Society of America},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1750-2977},
  doi       = {10.1080/17502977.2015.1137394},
  pages     = {56 -- 76},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This article explores the practice and political significance of politicians' journeys to conflict zones. It focuses on the German example, looking at field trips to theatres of international intervention as a way of first-hand knowledge in policymaking. Paying tribute to Lisa Smirl and her work on humanitarian spaces, objects and imaginaries and on liminality in aid worker biographies, two connected arguments are developed. First, through the exploration of the routinized practices of politicians' field trips the article shows how these journeys not only remain confined to the 'auxiliary space' of aid/intervention, but that it is furthermore a staged reality of this auxiliary space that most politicians experience on their journeys. The question is then asked, second, what politicians actually experience on their journeys and how their experiences relate to their policy knowledge about conflict and intervention. It is shown that political field trips enable sensory/affectual, liminoid and liminal experiences, which have functions such as authority accumulation, agenda setting, community building, and civilizing domestic politics, while at the same time reinforcing, in most cases, pre-existing conflict and intervention imaginaries.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Schmierer2005,
  author    = {Schmierer, Joscha},
  title     = {Provinzialismus k{\"o}nnte angenehm sein},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47579},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{BernsWoehrleChon2005,
  author    = {Berns, Andreas and W{\"o}hrle-Chon, Roland},
  title     = {Interkulturalit{\"a}t als Sicherheitsstrategie in einer globalisierten Welt},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47645},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {According to the new German defense policy concept, the German armed forces can be deployed abroad in multinational operations to establish security and to manage the aftermath of conflict in crisis areas. This paper investigates different aspects, resulting prospects and consequences connected with this challenge. It focuses on the meaning of intercultural competence with respect to the primary objective of Germany´s foreign deployment policy to achieve sustained, comprehensive and integral crisis prevention, and to generate peace in the 21st century.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Schwarz2004,
  author    = {Schwarz, Siegfried},
  title     = {Dramatisierung deutscher Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9658},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {In the spring issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann (Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe- Universit{\"a}t Frankfurt a. M.) sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a Realpolitik policy generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann this transformation indicates "the deepest crisis of German foreign policy" ever. Hellmann proposes a rehabilitation of the tradition of the Bonner Republik and an active Idealpolitik. This summer issue of WeltTrends features eleven articles written in response to Hellmann by International Relations scholars. The debate focuses on analytical as well as normative aspects of current German foreign policy. The authors discuss the context of the European Common Foreign and Security Policy, the international system and the United Nations, historical aspects of German foreign policy and the German foreign policy discourse. While some contributors share Hellmann's idealist position, most challenge his plea from a more realist perspective. In the upcoming fall issue, this debate will be continued with contributions by German foreign policy makers. A final reply by Hellmann will complete the debate in the winter issue of WeltTrends. Contributions by: Franz Ansprenger, Stephan B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Wilfried von Bredow, Sabine Busse, Edwina S. Campbell, Hartmut Elsenhans, Hans J. Gießmann, Werner Link, Carlo Masala, Hanns W. Maull, and Siegfried Schwarz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Klinnert2015,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Klinnert, Anne},
  title     = {Die Politik Deutschlands gegen{\"u}ber Zentralasien},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-286-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-70548},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {102},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Seit 1990 ist die vereinte, wieder souver{\"a}ne Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf der Suche nach ihrer Rolle in der Welt. Auch die akademische Debatte um die Orientierung deutscher Außenpolitik und die ihr zugrundeliegenden Interessen h{\"a}lt seitdem an. In welchem Verh{\"a}ltnis stehen Normen und Werte einerseits und pragmatische, meist wirtschaftliche Interessen andererseits zueinander? Wie verh{\"a}lt sich die deutsche Außenpolitik zur europ{\"a}ischen? Beeinflusst oder dominiert die deutsche Position gar die europ{\"a}ische? Am Beispiel der deutschen Außenpolitik gegen{\"u}ber den zentralasiatischen Staaten Kasachstan, Kirgisistan, Tadschikistan, Turkmenistan und Usbekistan werden diese Fragen diskutiert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Giessmann2004,
  author    = {Gießmann, Hans J.},
  title     = {Deutsche Außenpolitik sollte gescheite Friedenspolitik sein},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9676},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {In the spring issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann (Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe- Universit{\"a}t Frankfurt a. M.) sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a Realpolitik policy generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann this transformation indicates "the deepest crisis of German foreign policy" ever. Hellmann proposes a rehabilitation of the tradition of the Bonner Republik and an active Idealpolitik. This summer issue of WeltTrends features eleven articles written in response to Hellmann by International Relations scholars. The debate focuses on analytical as well as normative aspects of current German foreign policy. The authors discuss the context of the European Common Foreign and Security Policy, the international system and the United Nations, historical aspects of German foreign policy and the German foreign policy discourse. While some contributors share Hellmann's idealist position, most challenge his plea from a more realist perspective. In the upcoming fall issue, this debate will be continued with contributions by German foreign policy makers. A final reply by Hellmann will complete the debate in the winter issue of WeltTrends. Contributions by: Franz Ansprenger, Stephan B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Wilfried von Bredow, Sabine Busse, Edwina S. Campbell, Hartmut Elsenhans, Hans J. Gießmann, Werner Link, Carlo Masala, Hanns W. Maull, and Siegfried Schwarz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Hellmann2005,
  author    = {Hellmann, Gunther},
  title     = {Der neue Zwang zur großen Politik und die Wiederentdeckung besserer Welten : Eine Einladung zur Transformation der Auseinandersetzung {\"u}ber die machtpolitische Resozialisierung deutscher Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47890},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {In the Spring 2004 issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. The debate was resumed through the Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring editions (no. 43 to 46) of WeltTrends, which featured articles of German International Relations scholars as well as foreign policy-makers and experts from abroad. In his concluding article, Hellmann seizes the opportunity to outline and comment on some characteristics of the debate as revealed in the contributions of his critics.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Cichocki2004,
  author    = {Cichocki, Marek A.},
  title     = {Der hohe Preis der Macht},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47445},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Leibrecht2005,
  author    = {Leibrecht, Harald},
  title     = {Außenpolitik und Legitimation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47565},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}