@article{BookersJacobBohlkenetal.2016,
  author    = {Bookers, Anke and Jacob, Louis and Bohlken, Jens and Rapp, Michael Armin and Kostev, Karel},
  title     = {Persistence with antipsychotics in dementia patients in Germany},
  series = {International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics},
  publisher = {Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle},
  address   = {Deisenhofen-M{\~A}¼nchen},
  issn      = {0946-1965},
  doi       = {10.5414/CP202631},
  pages     = {835 -- 840},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background/Aims: To analyze the duration of treatment with antipsychotics in German dementia patients. Methods: This study included patients aged 60 years and over with dementia who received a first-time antipsychotic prescription by psychiatrists between 2009 and 2013. The main outcome measure was the treatment rate for more than 6 months following the index date. Results: A total of 12,979 patients with dementia (mean age 82 years, 52.1\% living in nursing homes) were included. After 2 years of follow-up, 54.8\%, 57.2\%, 61.1\%, and 65.4\% of patients aged 60 - 69, 70 - 79, 80 - 89, and 90 - 99 years, respectively, received antipsychotic prescriptions. 63.9\% of subjects living in nursing homes and 55.0\% of subjects living at home also continued their treatment (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: The percentage of dementia patients treated with anti psychotics is very high.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RadchukDeLaenderCabraletal.2019,
  author    = {Radchuk, Viktoriia and De Laender, Frederik and Cabral, Juliano Sarmento and Boulangeat, Isabelle and Crawford, Michael Scott and Bohn, Friedrich and De Raedt, Jonathan and Scherer, Cedric and Svenning, Jens-Christian and Thonicke, Kirsten and Schurr, Frank M. and Grimm, Volker and Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie},
  title     = {The dimensionality of stability depends on disturbance type},
  series = {Ecology letters},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Ecology letters},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1461-023X},
  doi       = {10.1111/ele.13226},
  pages     = {674 -- 684},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Ecosystems respond in various ways to disturbances. Quantifying ecological stability therefore requires inspecting multiple stability properties, such as resistance, recovery, persistence and invariability. Correlations among these properties can reduce the dimensionality of stability, simplifying the study of environmental effects on ecosystems. A key question is how the kind of disturbance affects these correlations. We here investigated the effect of three disturbance types (random, species-specific, local) applied at four intensity levels, on the dimensionality of stability at the population and community level. We used previously parameterized models that represent five natural communities, varying in species richness and the number of trophic levels. We found that disturbance type but not intensity affected the dimensionality of stability and only at the population level. The dimensionality of stability also varied greatly among species and communities. Therefore, studying stability cannot be simplified to using a single metric and multi-dimensional assessments are still to be recommended.},
  language  = {en}
}