@article{WilbertUrtonKrulletal.2020, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Urton, Karolina and Krull, Johanna and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Schwalbe, Anja and Hennemann, Thomas}, title = {Teachers' accuracy in estimating social inclusion of students with and without special educational needs}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.598330}, pages = {11}, year = {2020}, abstract = {It is unclear to what extent teachers can accurately assess the social inclusion of their students with and without SEN. The study aims to shed light on these desiderata. Students (N = 1.644) with SEN (learning, behavior, and language problems) and without SEN and their teachers (N = 79) participated in the study. Sociometric peer nominations, students' self-perceived social inclusion, and teachers' assessments regarding students' social inclusion and self-perceived social inclusion were administered. The results suggest that teachers are moderately accurate in identifying social acceptance and social rejection, while accuracy is low when assessing students' self-perceived social inclusion. That said, rating accuracy varied strongly between teachers, ranging from no agreement to a perfect concordance. Teachers seem to be more accurate in estimating the social acceptance of students with learning problems. The results emphasize the importance of differentiating between various social inclusion criteria (i.e., students' self-report vs. peer nominations) and accounting for inter-individual differences in teachers' rating accuracy.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Wagner2023, author = {Wagner, Luisa}, title = {Diagnosekompetenz (angehender) Lehrkr{\"a}fte}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {104}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Bereits im vorschulischen Bereich, aber vor allem in der Grundschule entwickeln Kinder wichtige Kompetenzen f{\"u}r sp{\"a}tere Bildungsabschl{\"u}sse. Doch die Kompe-tenzunterschiede zwischen den Sch{\"u}ler:innen sind bereits zu Beginn der Grund-schulzeit betr{\"a}chtlich. Somit kommt den Lehrkr{\"a}ften die {\"u}beraus wichtige Aufga-be zu allen Kindern den f{\"u}r sie besten Bildungsweg zu erm{\"o}glichen. Um dieser Herausforderung zu begegnen, m{\"u}ssen Diagnostik und F{\"o}rderung im Unterricht Hand in Hand gehen. Deshalb wird die Diagnosekompetenz von Lehrkr{\"a}ften als wichtige Voraussetzung f{\"u}r gelingenden Unterricht angesehen. Diese Dissertation widmet sich nun eben dieser wichtigen Kompetenz. Dabei wird sie als mehrdimen-sionales Konstrukt angesehen, zu dem neben der Beurteilung von fachlichen Kompetenzen auch die Einsch{\"a}tzung des Leistungsstandes und die Schlussfolge-rung hinsichtlich notwendiger F{\"o}rderung im Unterricht geh{\"o}ren. Anhand dreier Artikel sowie erg{\"a}nzender theoretischer Betrachtungen wurde die Diagnosekompe-tenz hinsichtlich m{\"o}glicher Einflussfaktoren, der Bedeutung f{\"u}r den Unterricht sowie f{\"u}r die Lehrer:innenbildung untersucht.}, language = {de} } @article{VockGronostajKretschmannetal.2018, author = {Vock, Miriam and Gronostaj, Anna and Kretschmann, Julia and Westphal, Andrea}, title = {„Meine Lehrer m{\"o}gen mich" - Soziale Integration von Kindern mit sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf im gemeinsamen Unterricht in der Grundschule}, series = {DDS - Die Deutsche Schule}, volume = {110}, journal = {DDS - Die Deutsche Schule}, number = {2}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, issn = {0012-0731}, doi = {10.31244/dds.2018.02.03}, pages = {124 -- 137}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Brandenburg startete im Schuljahr 2012/2013 das Pilotprojekt „Inklusive Grundschule" (PING). 35 dieser Pilot-Grundschulen wurden wissenschaftlich begleitet (vgl. Sp{\"o}rer, Schr{\"u}nder-Lenzen, Vock \& Maaz, 2015). In diesem Beitrag berichten wir Befunde zum sozialen Selbstkonzept, wie die Kinder das Klassenklima erleben und wie sie sich von ihrer Lehrkraft angenommen f{\"u}hlen. Untersucht wurden 1.435 Kinder in 61 inklusiven Klassen der Jahrgangsstufen 2 und 3. Es finden sich keine durchg{\"a}ngigen Nachteile bei Selbstkonzept und erlebtem Klassenklima f{\"u}r Kinder mit sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf (SPF), jedoch f{\"u}hlen sich diese weniger von ihren Lehrkr{\"a}ften angenommen.}, language = {de} } @article{SaloviitaSchaffus2016, author = {Saloviita, Timo and Schaffus, Tina}, title = {Teacher attitudes towards inclusive education in Finland and Brandenburg, Germany and the issue of extra work}, series = {European journal of special needs education}, volume = {31}, journal = {European journal of special needs education}, publisher = {Klett-Cotta Verlag}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0885-6257}, doi = {10.1080/08856257.2016.1194569}, pages = {458 -- 471}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{KulawiakUrtonKrulletal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Urton, Karolina and Krull, Johanna and Hennemann, Thomas and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Internalizing Behavior of Sociometrically Neglected Students in Inclusive Primary Classrooms}, series = {frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00032}, pages = {12}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Internalizing problems in children belong to the category of special educational needs called emotional and behavioral difficulties. Recent decades have witnessed a critical discussion about whether children and adolescents experiencing internalizing problems are at risk of being sociometrically neglected (neither liked nor disliked by their peers). Previous studies have shown evidence both for and against the association between internalizing problems and neglected sociometric status. These contradictory results may be due to the following methodological aspects: (1) shortcomings of sociometric status classification methods (arbitrariness of the sociometric classification rules) and (2) different operationalizations of internalizing problems (broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior). The aim of the present study is to investigate empirically whether and to what extent these methodological aspects lead to contradictory results on the internalizing behavior of neglected students. This question is investigated using a sample of students (N = 2334) in German inclusive primary schools. The systematic investigation presented here provides initial indications that the various methodological approaches can lead to conflicting results. The contradictory results are not only due to the application of different sociometric classification methods, but also to different operationalizations of internalizing behavior (narrowband and broadband scales). Earlier contradictory evidence on the internalizing behavior of neglected students must therefore be seen in a different light: the reasons for previously conflicting results may actually be methodological. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn as to how methodological aspects can be given more consideration in sociometric research on internalizing behavior.}, language = {en} } @article{CivitillodeMoorVervloed2016, author = {Civitillo, Sauro and de Moor, Jan M. H. and Vervloed, Mathijs P. J.}, title = {Netherlands: An exploratory study}, series = {Support for Learning : British Journal of Learning Support}, volume = {31}, journal = {Support for Learning : British Journal of Learning Support}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0268-2141}, doi = {10.1111/1467-9604.12119}, pages = {104 -- 121}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Teachers' beliefs are crucial to the success of inclusion programmes and reform efforts for children with special educational needs (SEN). Based on this evidence, one hundred and thirty-nine primary pre-service teachers from one training institution in the Netherlands completed an adapted version of a measure of beliefs towards inclusive education. In contrast to previous studies on pre-service teachers, results of this study showed participants held neutral or negative beliefs towards this matter. In addition, limited time for pupils received the highest rating as a barrier to inclusion, whereas direct teaching experience was the most preferred method of inclusion. The implications of this study for practice and indications for future research are discussed.}, language = {en} }