@misc{SiegVogelMerzetal.2019,
  author    = {Sieg, Tobias and Vogel, Kristin and Merz, Bruno and Kreibich, Heidi},
  title     = {Seamless Estimation of Hydrometeorological Risk Across Spatial Scales},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {743},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43534},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435341},
  pages     = {574 -- 581},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Hydrometeorological hazards caused losses of approximately 110 billion U.S. Dollars in 2016 worldwide. Current damage estimations do not consider the uncertainties in a comprehensive way, and they are not consistent between spatial scales. Aggregated land use data are used at larger spatial scales, although detailed exposure data at the object level, such as openstreetmap.org, is becoming increasingly available across the globe.We present a probabilistic approach for object-based damage estimation which represents uncertainties and is fully scalable in space. The approach is applied and validated to company damage from the flood of 2013 in Germany. Damage estimates are more accurate compared to damage models using land use data, and the estimation works reliably at all spatial scales. Therefore, it can as well be used for pre-event analysis and risk assessments. This method takes hydrometeorological damage estimation and risk assessments to the next level, making damage estimates and their uncertainties fully scalable in space, from object to country level, and enabling the exploitation of new exposure data.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MuehlenbruchKuxhausPencinaetal.2015,
  author    = {M{\"u}hlenbruch, Kristin and Kuxhaus, Olga and Pencina, Michael J. and Boeing, Heiner and Liero, Hannelore and Schulze, Matthias Bernd},
  title     = {A confidence ellipse for the Net Reclassification Improvement},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {825},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42737},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-427371},
  pages     = {299 -- 304},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) has become a popular metric for evaluating improvement in disease prediction models through the past years. The concept is relatively straightforward but usage and interpretation has been different across studies. While no thresholds exist for evaluating the degree of improvement, many studies have relied solely on the significance of the NRI estimate. However, recent studies recommend that statistical testing with the NRI should be avoided. We propose using confidence ellipses around the estimated values of event and non-event NRIs which might provide the best measure of variability around the point estimates. Our developments are illustrated using practical examples from EPIC-Potsdam study.},
  language  = {en}
}