@article{GleissLewandowski2022,
  author    = {Gleiß, Alexander and Lewandowski, Stefanie},
  title     = {Removing barriers for digital health through organizing ambidexterity in hospitals},
  series = {Journal of public health},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Journal of public health},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {2198-1833},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10389-021-01532-y},
  pages     = {21 -- 35},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Aim Hospitals noticeably struggle with maintaining hundreds of IT systems and applications in compliance with the latest IT standards and regulations. Thus, hospitals search for efficient opportunities to discover and integrate useful digital health innovations into their existing IT landscapes. In addition, although a multitude of digital innovations from digital health startups enter the market, numerous barriers impede their successful implementation and adoption. Against this background, the aim of this study was to explore typical digital innovation barriers in hospitals, and to assess how a hospital data management platform (HDMP) architecture might help hospitals to extract such innovative capabilities. Subject and methods Based on the concept of organizational ambidexterity (OA), we pursued a qualitative mixed-methods approach. First, we explored and consolidated innovation barriers through a systematic literature review, interviews with 20 startup representatives, and a focus group interview with a hospital IT team and the CEO of an HDMP provider. Finally, we conducted a case-study analysis of 36 digital health startups to explore and conceptualize the potential impact of DI and apply the morphological method to synthesize our findings from a multi-level perspective. Results We first provide a systematic and conceptual overview of typical barriers for digital innovation in hospitals. Hereupon, we explain how an HDMP might enable hospitals to mitigate such barriers and extract value from digital innovations at both individual and organizational level. Conclusion Our results imply that an HDMP can help hospitals to approach organizational ambidexterity through integrating and maintaining hundreds of systems and applications, which allows for a structured and controlled integration of external digital innovations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LuckeHaferHartmann2020,
  author    = {Lucke, Ulrike and Hafer, J{\"o}rg and Hartmann, Niklas},
  title     = {Strategieentwicklung in der Hochschule als partizipativer Prozess},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Hochschulforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Hochschulforschung},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-498-2},
  issn      = {2192-1075},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-49276},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-492764},
  pages     = {99 -- 117},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die Setzung strategischer Ziele sowie die Zuordnung und Umsetzung dazugeh{\"o}render Maßnahmen sind ein wesentliches Element, um die Innovationsf{\"a}higkeit von Organisationen zu erhalten. In den vergangenen Jahren ist auch an Hochschulen die Strategiebildung deutlich vorangetrieben worden. Dies betrifft verschiedene Handlungsfelder, und es werden verschiedene Ans{\"a}tze verfolgt. Der vorliegende Beitrag greift am Beispiel der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam drei in den vergangenen Jahren adressierte Strategiebereiche heraus: IT, E-Learning und Forschungsdaten. Die damit verbundenen Prozesse waren in unterschiedlichem Maß von Partizipation gepr{\"a}gt. Die gesammelten Erfahrungen werden reflektiert, und es werden Empfehlungen f{\"u}r Strategieentwicklungsprozesse abgeleitet.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BaumannKritikos2016,
  author    = {Baumann, Julian and Kritikos, Alexander},
  title     = {The link between R\&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?},
  series = {Research Policy},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {Research Policy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0048-7333},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.008},
  pages     = {1263 -- 1274},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {We analyze the link between R\&D, innovation, and productivity in MSMEs with a special focus on micro firms with fewer than 10 employees; usually constituting the majority of firms in industrialized economies. Using the German KfW SME-panel, we examine to what extent micro firms are different from other firms in terms of innovativeness. We find that while firms engage in innovative activities with smaller probability, the smaller they are, for those firms that do make such investment, R\&D intensity is larger the smaller firms are. For all MSMEs, the predicted R\&D intensity is positively correlated with the probability of reporting innovation, with a larger effect size for product than for process innovations. Moreover, micro firms benefit in a comparable way from innovation processes as larger firms, as they are similarly able to increase their labor productivity. Overall, the link between R\&D, innovation, and productivity in micro firms does not largely differ from their larger counterparts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CaliendoHogenackerKuennetal.2015,
  author    = {Caliendo, Marco and Hogenacker, Jens and Kuenn, Steffen and Wiessner, Frank},
  title     = {Subsidized start-ups out of unemployment: a comparison to regular business start-ups},
  series = {Small business economics : an international journal},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {Small business economics : an international journal},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0921-898X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11187-015-9646-0},
  pages     = {165 -- 190},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Offering unemployed individuals a subsidy to become self-employed is a widespread active labor market policy strategy. Previous studies have illustrated its high effectiveness to help participants escaping unemployment and improving their labor market prospects compared to other unemployed individuals. However, the examination of start-up subsidies from a business perspective has only received little attention to date. Using a new dataset based on a survey allows us to compare subsidized start-ups out of unemployment with regular business founders, with respect to not only personal characteristics but also business outcomes. The results indicate that previously unemployed entrepreneurs face disadvantages in variables correlated with entrepreneurial ability and access to capital. Nineteen months after start-up, the subsidized businesses experience higher survival, but lag behind regular business founders in terms of income, business growth and innovation. Moreover, we show that expected deadweight effects related to start-up subsidies occur on a (much) lower scale than usually assumed.},
  language  = {en}
}